企业对新冠肺炎疫情的应对

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113664
Maximilian Klöckner , Christoph G. Schmidt , Stephan M. Wagner , Morgan Swink
{"title":"企业对新冠肺炎疫情的应对","authors":"Maximilian Klöckner ,&nbsp;Christoph G. Schmidt ,&nbsp;Stephan M. Wagner ,&nbsp;Morgan Swink","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The COVID-19 pandemic requires firms to adequately respond. In this study, we first explore in our empirical data how firms responded to the COVID-19 crisis and identify five tactical response <em>types</em>, operational, digitalization, financial, supportive, and organizational responses. Furthermore, our findings indicate that responses vary in <em>scope</em>; Some firms act on their own, while others engage in collaborations. Finally, we find that the response <em>angle</em> is different across firms, as some firms leverage potential and others primarily mitigate risk. Second, we follow an event study design to measure the financial implications of these responses. We find that responses to the COVID-19 pandemic generally entail a positive stock market reaction. Financial and digitalization responses, as well as risk mitigation responses, are consistently evaluated positively. We discuss our findings in context of different theoretical lenses, substantiating the emerging literature on the COVID-19 crisis, and the established literature on crisis response management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 113664"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841242/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Firms’ responses to the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Klöckner ,&nbsp;Christoph G. Schmidt ,&nbsp;Stephan M. Wagner ,&nbsp;Morgan Swink\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The COVID-19 pandemic requires firms to adequately respond. In this study, we first explore in our empirical data how firms responded to the COVID-19 crisis and identify five tactical response <em>types</em>, operational, digitalization, financial, supportive, and organizational responses. Furthermore, our findings indicate that responses vary in <em>scope</em>; Some firms act on their own, while others engage in collaborations. Finally, we find that the response <em>angle</em> is different across firms, as some firms leverage potential and others primarily mitigate risk. Second, we follow an event study design to measure the financial implications of these responses. We find that responses to the COVID-19 pandemic generally entail a positive stock market reaction. Financial and digitalization responses, as well as risk mitigation responses, are consistently evaluated positively. We discuss our findings in context of different theoretical lenses, substantiating the emerging literature on the COVID-19 crisis, and the established literature on crisis response management.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"158 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113664\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9841242/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632300022X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632300022X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

新冠肺炎疫情要求企业做出充分反应。在这项研究中,我们首先在实证数据中探讨了企业如何应对新冠肺炎危机,并确定了五种战术应对类型,即运营、数字化、财务、支持和组织应对。此外,我们的研究结果表明,反应的范围各不相同;一些公司采取自己的行动,而另一些公司则进行合作。最后,我们发现,不同公司的反应角度不同,因为一些公司利用潜力,而另一些公司主要减轻风险。其次,我们遵循事件研究设计来衡量这些回应的财务影响。我们发现,对新冠肺炎大流行的反应通常会导致股市的积极反应。金融和数字化应对措施以及风险缓解应对措施始终得到积极评价。我们从不同的理论视角讨论了我们的发现,证实了关于新冠肺炎危机的新兴文献和关于危机应对管理的既定文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Firms’ responses to the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic requires firms to adequately respond. In this study, we first explore in our empirical data how firms responded to the COVID-19 crisis and identify five tactical response types, operational, digitalization, financial, supportive, and organizational responses. Furthermore, our findings indicate that responses vary in scope; Some firms act on their own, while others engage in collaborations. Finally, we find that the response angle is different across firms, as some firms leverage potential and others primarily mitigate risk. Second, we follow an event study design to measure the financial implications of these responses. We find that responses to the COVID-19 pandemic generally entail a positive stock market reaction. Financial and digitalization responses, as well as risk mitigation responses, are consistently evaluated positively. We discuss our findings in context of different theoretical lenses, substantiating the emerging literature on the COVID-19 crisis, and the established literature on crisis response management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Content dissimilarity and online review helpfulness: Contextual insights Editorial Board Preventing algorithm aversion: People are willing to use algorithms with a learning label Agility in marketing teams: An analysis of factors influencing the entry decision into a trendy social network Socio-politically silent brands: A double edged sword
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1