单回波与多回波敏感性加权成像检测脑动静脉分流的比较初步研究。

Seung Wan Han, Jae Ho Shin, Yon Kwon Ihn, Seung Ho Yang, Jae Hoon Sung
{"title":"单回波与多回波敏感性加权成像检测脑动静脉分流的比较初步研究。","authors":"Seung Wan Han,&nbsp;Jae Ho Shin,&nbsp;Yon Kwon Ihn,&nbsp;Seung Ho Yang,&nbsp;Jae Hoon Sung","doi":"10.3348/jksr.2022.0080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the sensitivities of T2-weighted image (T2WI) and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) in detecting cerebral arteriovenous fistula (AVF), cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM), and carotid-cavernous sinus fistula (CCF), and to qualitatively evaluate single-echo SWI (s-SWI) and multi-echo SWI (m-SWI) in characterizing vascular lesions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From January 2016 to December 2021, cerebral angiography-proven lesions were recruited. The sensitivities of T2WI and SWI in detecting vascular lesions were compared using McNemar's test. Qualitative evaluations of s-SWI and m-SWI were categorized to be of poor, average, or good quality and compared using Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 patients (mean age: 61 years, 12 female, and 12 male) were enrolled. Twenty patients underwent s-SWI or m-SWI, and four patients underwent both. AVF, AVM, and CCF were diagnosed in 10, 11, and 3 patients, respectively. SWI demonstrated higher sensitivity compared to that of T2WI (82.1% vs. 53.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.013). m-SWI showed better image quality compared to that of s-SWI (good quality, 83.3% vs. 25.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SWI demonstrated a higher sensitivity for detecting cerebral arteriovenous shunts compared to that of T2WI. m-SWI exhibited better image quality compared to that of s-SWI in characterizing vascular lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17455,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a5/85/jksr-84-226.PMC9935958.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Single- and Multi-Echo Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging in Detecting Cerebral Arteriovenous Shunts: A Preliminary Study.\",\"authors\":\"Seung Wan Han,&nbsp;Jae Ho Shin,&nbsp;Yon Kwon Ihn,&nbsp;Seung Ho Yang,&nbsp;Jae Hoon Sung\",\"doi\":\"10.3348/jksr.2022.0080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the sensitivities of T2-weighted image (T2WI) and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) in detecting cerebral arteriovenous fistula (AVF), cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM), and carotid-cavernous sinus fistula (CCF), and to qualitatively evaluate single-echo SWI (s-SWI) and multi-echo SWI (m-SWI) in characterizing vascular lesions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From January 2016 to December 2021, cerebral angiography-proven lesions were recruited. The sensitivities of T2WI and SWI in detecting vascular lesions were compared using McNemar's test. Qualitative evaluations of s-SWI and m-SWI were categorized to be of poor, average, or good quality and compared using Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 patients (mean age: 61 years, 12 female, and 12 male) were enrolled. Twenty patients underwent s-SWI or m-SWI, and four patients underwent both. AVF, AVM, and CCF were diagnosed in 10, 11, and 3 patients, respectively. SWI demonstrated higher sensitivity compared to that of T2WI (82.1% vs. 53.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.013). m-SWI showed better image quality compared to that of s-SWI (good quality, 83.3% vs. 25.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SWI demonstrated a higher sensitivity for detecting cerebral arteriovenous shunts compared to that of T2WI. m-SWI exhibited better image quality compared to that of s-SWI in characterizing vascular lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a5/85/jksr-84-226.PMC9935958.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2022.0080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2022.0080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较T2WI和敏感性加权成像(SWI)对脑动静脉瘘(AVF)、脑动静脉畸形(AVM)和颈海绵状窦瘘(CCF)的检测敏感性,并定性评价单回波SWI (s-SWI)和多回波SWI (m-SWI)对血管病变的诊断价值。材料与方法:2016年1月至2021年12月,招募经脑血管造影证实的病变患者。采用McNemar试验比较T2WI和SWI对血管病变的敏感性。s-SWI和m-SWI的定性评价分为差、平均或良好,并使用Fisher精确检验进行比较。结果:共纳入24例患者,平均年龄61岁,女性12例,男性12例。20例患者接受s-SWI或m-SWI, 4例患者同时接受s-SWI和m-SWI。AVF 10例,AVM 11例,CCF 3例。与T2WI相比,SWI的敏感性更高(82.1% vs. 53.6%, p = 0.013)。m-SWI的图像质量优于s-SWI(质量好,83.3% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.009)。结论:与T2WI相比,SWI对脑动静脉分流的检测灵敏度更高。与s-SWI相比,m-SWI在表征血管病变方面表现出更好的图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Single- and Multi-Echo Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging in Detecting Cerebral Arteriovenous Shunts: A Preliminary Study.

Purpose: To compare the sensitivities of T2-weighted image (T2WI) and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) in detecting cerebral arteriovenous fistula (AVF), cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM), and carotid-cavernous sinus fistula (CCF), and to qualitatively evaluate single-echo SWI (s-SWI) and multi-echo SWI (m-SWI) in characterizing vascular lesions.

Materials and methods: From January 2016 to December 2021, cerebral angiography-proven lesions were recruited. The sensitivities of T2WI and SWI in detecting vascular lesions were compared using McNemar's test. Qualitative evaluations of s-SWI and m-SWI were categorized to be of poor, average, or good quality and compared using Fisher's exact test.

Results: A total of 24 patients (mean age: 61 years, 12 female, and 12 male) were enrolled. Twenty patients underwent s-SWI or m-SWI, and four patients underwent both. AVF, AVM, and CCF were diagnosed in 10, 11, and 3 patients, respectively. SWI demonstrated higher sensitivity compared to that of T2WI (82.1% vs. 53.6%, p = 0.013). m-SWI showed better image quality compared to that of s-SWI (good quality, 83.3% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.009).

Conclusion: SWI demonstrated a higher sensitivity for detecting cerebral arteriovenous shunts compared to that of T2WI. m-SWI exhibited better image quality compared to that of s-SWI in characterizing vascular lesions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rare Manifestation of the Cutaneous and Cervical Lymph Node Metastases of Urothelial Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder: A Case Report. Persistent Primitive Olfactory Artery Type 4 with Fusiform Aneurysm: A Case Report. Recurrent Post-Traumatic Adrenal Bleeding after Transcatheter Arterial Embolization: A Case Report. Typical and Atypical Imaging Features of Malignant Lymphoma in the Abdomen and Mimicking Diseases. Immunoglobulin G4-Related Lung Disease with Waxing and Waning Pulmonary Infiltrates: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1