{"title":"黑人与美国宪法的矛盾含义:金的“我有一个梦想”演讲与教育不平等的交叉性。","authors":"Brandon R Isome","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Employing the rhetorical phraseology of a \"promissory note,\" dramatized in the public address of Martin Luther King Jr., during the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, this article historically postulates Black Americans as constitutional beggars until Reconstruction. The white framers of our Republic legislated the dehumanization and constitutional disregard of Black Americans who continuously find themselves fighting for rights and privileges granted through American citizenship. Illuminating the paradoxical implications of blackness, substantiated in anti-black policies and practices that beset educational institutions, unravels the connectedness between King's public address and educational inequalities. <i>Brown v. Board of Education</i> becomes a palpable case that congeals King's ideological usage of the term \"promissory note\" with educational inequalities and solidifies the ideological connectedness between blackness and schooling.</p>","PeriodicalId":73773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthcare, science and the humanities","volume":"10 1","pages":"84-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930496/pdf/jhsh-10-84.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Paradoxical Implications of Blackness and the U.S. Constitution: The Intersectionality of King's \\\"I Have a Dream\\\" Speech and Educational Inequalities.\",\"authors\":\"Brandon R Isome\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Employing the rhetorical phraseology of a \\\"promissory note,\\\" dramatized in the public address of Martin Luther King Jr., during the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, this article historically postulates Black Americans as constitutional beggars until Reconstruction. The white framers of our Republic legislated the dehumanization and constitutional disregard of Black Americans who continuously find themselves fighting for rights and privileges granted through American citizenship. Illuminating the paradoxical implications of blackness, substantiated in anti-black policies and practices that beset educational institutions, unravels the connectedness between King's public address and educational inequalities. <i>Brown v. Board of Education</i> becomes a palpable case that congeals King's ideological usage of the term \\\"promissory note\\\" with educational inequalities and solidifies the ideological connectedness between blackness and schooling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of healthcare, science and the humanities\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"84-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9930496/pdf/jhsh-10-84.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of healthcare, science and the humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthcare, science and the humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇文章采用了马丁·路德·金(Martin Luther King Jr.)在1963年为争取就业和自由而向华盛顿进军的公开演讲中戏剧化的“期票”修辞措辞,历史性地将美国黑人视为宪法上的乞丐,直到重建时期。我们共和国的白人缔造者通过立法剥夺了黑人的人性,在宪法上无视黑人,而黑人不断地为美国公民身份赋予的权利和特权而斗争。揭示了黑人的矛盾含义,在反黑人政策和实践中得到证实,这些政策和实践困扰着教育机构,揭示了马丁·路德·金的公开演讲与教育不平等之间的联系。布朗诉教育委员会案成为一个明显的案例,它将金对“本票”一词的意识形态用法与教育不平等联系在一起,并巩固了黑人与学校教育之间的意识形态联系。
The Paradoxical Implications of Blackness and the U.S. Constitution: The Intersectionality of King's "I Have a Dream" Speech and Educational Inequalities.
Employing the rhetorical phraseology of a "promissory note," dramatized in the public address of Martin Luther King Jr., during the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, this article historically postulates Black Americans as constitutional beggars until Reconstruction. The white framers of our Republic legislated the dehumanization and constitutional disregard of Black Americans who continuously find themselves fighting for rights and privileges granted through American citizenship. Illuminating the paradoxical implications of blackness, substantiated in anti-black policies and practices that beset educational institutions, unravels the connectedness between King's public address and educational inequalities. Brown v. Board of Education becomes a palpable case that congeals King's ideological usage of the term "promissory note" with educational inequalities and solidifies the ideological connectedness between blackness and schooling.