学生和教师对高中作弊的看法:感知、评价和决定

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Research on Adolescence Pub Date : 2022-08-07 DOI:10.1111/jora.12784
Talia Waltzer, Fiona C. DeBernardi, Audun Dahl
{"title":"学生和教师对高中作弊的看法:感知、评价和决定","authors":"Talia Waltzer,&nbsp;Fiona C. DeBernardi,&nbsp;Audun Dahl","doi":"10.1111/jora.12784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Why do so many adolescents cheat despite judging that cheating is wrong? Two studies tested a new model of cheating in high school. In Study 1, 85 high schoolers in the Western U.S. reported their perceptions, evaluations, and motivations surrounding their own and hypothetical cheating. In Study 2, 83 teachers reported their views about cheating; we also analyzed course syllabi. About half of the adolescents reported unintentional cheating, and many judged their own cheating—but not hypothetical cheating—as acceptable. Decisions to cheat were responses to competing pressures, low value placed on the assignment, and other considerations. Study 2 revealed teacher-student disagreements about cheating, and minimal content about academic integrity in syllabi. The findings supported the proposed model of adolescent cheating.</p>","PeriodicalId":17026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","volume":"33 1","pages":"108-126"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jora.12784","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student and Teacher Views on Cheating in High School: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Decisions\",\"authors\":\"Talia Waltzer,&nbsp;Fiona C. DeBernardi,&nbsp;Audun Dahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jora.12784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Why do so many adolescents cheat despite judging that cheating is wrong? Two studies tested a new model of cheating in high school. In Study 1, 85 high schoolers in the Western U.S. reported their perceptions, evaluations, and motivations surrounding their own and hypothetical cheating. In Study 2, 83 teachers reported their views about cheating; we also analyzed course syllabi. About half of the adolescents reported unintentional cheating, and many judged their own cheating—but not hypothetical cheating—as acceptable. Decisions to cheat were responses to competing pressures, low value placed on the assignment, and other considerations. Study 2 revealed teacher-student disagreements about cheating, and minimal content about academic integrity in syllabi. The findings supported the proposed model of adolescent cheating.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research on Adolescence\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"108-126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jora.12784\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research on Adolescence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jora.12784\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jora.12784","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

为什么这么多青少年明知作弊是错误的,却仍然作弊呢?两项研究测试了一种新的高中作弊模式。在研究1中,美国西部的85名高中生报告了他们对自己和假想作弊的看法、评价和动机。在研究2中,83名教师报告了他们对作弊的看法;我们也分析了课程大纲。大约一半的青少年报告了无意的作弊,许多人认为他们自己的作弊是可以接受的,但不是假设的作弊。作弊的决定是对竞争压力的反应,对任务的低价值,以及其他考虑。研究2揭示了师生在作弊问题上的分歧,教学大纲中关于学术诚信的内容很少。这些发现支持了青少年作弊的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Student and Teacher Views on Cheating in High School: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Decisions

Why do so many adolescents cheat despite judging that cheating is wrong? Two studies tested a new model of cheating in high school. In Study 1, 85 high schoolers in the Western U.S. reported their perceptions, evaluations, and motivations surrounding their own and hypothetical cheating. In Study 2, 83 teachers reported their views about cheating; we also analyzed course syllabi. About half of the adolescents reported unintentional cheating, and many judged their own cheating—but not hypothetical cheating—as acceptable. Decisions to cheat were responses to competing pressures, low value placed on the assignment, and other considerations. Study 2 revealed teacher-student disagreements about cheating, and minimal content about academic integrity in syllabi. The findings supported the proposed model of adolescent cheating.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary and international in scope, the Journal of Research on Adolescence (JRA) significantly advances knowledge in the field of adolescent research. Employing a diverse array of methodologies, this compelling journal publishes original research and integrative reviews of the highest level of scholarship. Featured studies include both quantitative and qualitative methodologies applied to cognitive, physical, emotional, and social development and behavior. Articles pertinent to the variety of developmental patterns inherent throughout adolescence are featured, including cross-national and cross-cultural studies. Attention is given to normative patterns of behavior as well as individual differences rooted in personal or social and cultural factors.
期刊最新文献
Daily association between parent-adolescent emotion contagion: The role of parent-adolescent connectednesss. Commentary: Revisiting developmental science research practices during a global crisis. Commentary: The COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on adolescent development: Embracing a more ecological perspective. Strategies to promote safety for sexual and gender minority youth in secondary schools: A longitudinal analysis. Challenging the dichotomy: Examining parent socialization goals and behaviors regarding positive affect in Bengaluru, India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1