激素受体阳性和her2阴性乳腺癌雌激素和孕激素受体差异表达水平的临床特征和预后分析:一项10年回顾性研究

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Journal Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/5469163
Jin Liu, Mingyu Gan, Zijing Lin, Qin Deng, Juan Deng, Bin Zeng, Yanling Shi, Jia Ming
{"title":"激素受体阳性和her2阴性乳腺癌雌激素和孕激素受体差异表达水平的临床特征和预后分析:一项10年回顾性研究","authors":"Jin Liu,&nbsp;Mingyu Gan,&nbsp;Zijing Lin,&nbsp;Qin Deng,&nbsp;Juan Deng,&nbsp;Bin Zeng,&nbsp;Yanling Shi,&nbsp;Jia Ming","doi":"10.1155/2022/5469163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Estrogen and progesterone receptor status can predict breast cancer patient prognosis and treatment sensitivity, but research on low ER and PR levels and expression balance remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2010 to October 2016, 283 ER+/PR+/HER2-breast cancer patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled and divided into the H group (ER > 10%, <i>N</i> = 261) and the <i>L</i> group (1% ≤ ER ≤ 10%, <i>N</i> = 22). Groups were further divided into the HH group (ER > 10%/PR > 20%, <i>N</i> = 201), the HL group (ER > 10%/ER 1% ≤ PR ≤ 20% PR, <i>N</i> = 60), the LH group (1% ≤ ER ≤ 10%/PR > 20%, <i>N</i> = 5), and the LL group (1% ≤ ER ≤ 10%/1% ≤ PR ≤ 20%, <i>N</i> = 17). The LH group was excluded due to its small size, leaving the clinical and prognostic characteristics of 2 large groups and 3 subgroups to be analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>L</i> group patients had significantly more stage <i>N</i>2 axillary lymph nodes than H group patients (31.8% vs. 9.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.007). Age (<i>P</i> = 0.011), menopause status (<i>P</i> = 0.001), and tumor size (<i>P</i> = 0.024) were significantly different in the HL vs. HH and LL groups. Five-year DFS (94.6% vs. 77.0%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and 5-year OS (97.2% vs. 85.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.001) rates significantly differed between HH and HL. No significant differences in 5-year DFS (77.0% vs. 81.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.564) or 5-year OS (85.8% vs. 87.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.729) rates were observed between HL and LL; the OS rates of HL and LL were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the group of ER+/PR+/HER2-patients, there was no significant prognostic difference between ER-low positive and ER-high positive groups, but low PR expression was significantly associated with a worse prognosis. The role of ER and PR balance in breast cancer progression and individualized treatment requires further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":56326,"journal":{"name":"Breast Journal","volume":"2022 ","pages":"5469163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726250/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Features and Prognosis Analysis of Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer with Differential Expression Levels of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors: A 10-Year Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jin Liu,&nbsp;Mingyu Gan,&nbsp;Zijing Lin,&nbsp;Qin Deng,&nbsp;Juan Deng,&nbsp;Bin Zeng,&nbsp;Yanling Shi,&nbsp;Jia Ming\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/5469163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Estrogen and progesterone receptor status can predict breast cancer patient prognosis and treatment sensitivity, but research on low ER and PR levels and expression balance remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2010 to October 2016, 283 ER+/PR+/HER2-breast cancer patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled and divided into the H group (ER > 10%, <i>N</i> = 261) and the <i>L</i> group (1% ≤ ER ≤ 10%, <i>N</i> = 22). Groups were further divided into the HH group (ER > 10%/PR > 20%, <i>N</i> = 201), the HL group (ER > 10%/ER 1% ≤ PR ≤ 20% PR, <i>N</i> = 60), the LH group (1% ≤ ER ≤ 10%/PR > 20%, <i>N</i> = 5), and the LL group (1% ≤ ER ≤ 10%/1% ≤ PR ≤ 20%, <i>N</i> = 17). The LH group was excluded due to its small size, leaving the clinical and prognostic characteristics of 2 large groups and 3 subgroups to be analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>L</i> group patients had significantly more stage <i>N</i>2 axillary lymph nodes than H group patients (31.8% vs. 9.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.007). Age (<i>P</i> = 0.011), menopause status (<i>P</i> = 0.001), and tumor size (<i>P</i> = 0.024) were significantly different in the HL vs. HH and LL groups. Five-year DFS (94.6% vs. 77.0%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and 5-year OS (97.2% vs. 85.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.001) rates significantly differed between HH and HL. No significant differences in 5-year DFS (77.0% vs. 81.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.564) or 5-year OS (85.8% vs. 87.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.729) rates were observed between HL and LL; the OS rates of HL and LL were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the group of ER+/PR+/HER2-patients, there was no significant prognostic difference between ER-low positive and ER-high positive groups, but low PR expression was significantly associated with a worse prognosis. The role of ER and PR balance in breast cancer progression and individualized treatment requires further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Journal\",\"volume\":\"2022 \",\"pages\":\"5469163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9726250/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5469163\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5469163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:雌激素和孕激素受体状态可以预测乳腺癌患者预后和治疗敏感性,但对低ER和PR水平及表达平衡的研究仍然有限。方法:选取2010年1月~ 2016年10月符合入选标准的ER+/PR+/ her2乳腺癌患者283例,分为H组(ER > 10%, N = 261)和L组(1%≤ER≤10%,N = 22)。组进一步分为HH组(ER /公关> 20% > 10%,N = 201), HL集团(ER / ER 1% > 10%≤公关公关≤20%,N = 60)、LH组(1%≤ER /公关> 20%≤10%,N = 5),和我组(1%≤ER≤10% / 1%≤公关≤20%,N = 17)。LH组因其规模小而被排除,留下2个大组和3个亚组的临床和预后特征待分析。结果:L组N2期腋窝淋巴结发生率明显高于H组(31.8% vs. 9.2%, P = 0.007)。HL组与HH、LL组相比,年龄(P = 0.011)、绝经状态(P = 0.001)、肿瘤大小(P = 0.024)差异有统计学意义。HH和HL的5年DFS (94.6% vs. 77.0%, P P = 0.001)有显著差异。HL和LL的5年DFS (77.0% vs. 81.9%, P = 0.564)和5年OS (85.8% vs. 87.8%, P = 0.729)率无显著差异;HL和LL的OS率相似。结论:在ER+/PR+/ her2患者组中,ER低阳性组与ER高阳性组预后无显著差异,但PR低表达与预后较差显著相关。ER和PR平衡在乳腺癌进展和个体化治疗中的作用有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Features and Prognosis Analysis of Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer with Differential Expression Levels of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors: A 10-Year Retrospective Study.

Background: Estrogen and progesterone receptor status can predict breast cancer patient prognosis and treatment sensitivity, but research on low ER and PR levels and expression balance remains limited.

Methods: From January 2010 to October 2016, 283 ER+/PR+/HER2-breast cancer patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled and divided into the H group (ER > 10%, N = 261) and the L group (1% ≤ ER ≤ 10%, N = 22). Groups were further divided into the HH group (ER > 10%/PR > 20%, N = 201), the HL group (ER > 10%/ER 1% ≤ PR ≤ 20% PR, N = 60), the LH group (1% ≤ ER ≤ 10%/PR > 20%, N = 5), and the LL group (1% ≤ ER ≤ 10%/1% ≤ PR ≤ 20%, N = 17). The LH group was excluded due to its small size, leaving the clinical and prognostic characteristics of 2 large groups and 3 subgroups to be analyzed.

Results: L group patients had significantly more stage N2 axillary lymph nodes than H group patients (31.8% vs. 9.2%, P = 0.007). Age (P = 0.011), menopause status (P = 0.001), and tumor size (P = 0.024) were significantly different in the HL vs. HH and LL groups. Five-year DFS (94.6% vs. 77.0%, P < 0.001) and 5-year OS (97.2% vs. 85.8%, P = 0.001) rates significantly differed between HH and HL. No significant differences in 5-year DFS (77.0% vs. 81.9%, P = 0.564) or 5-year OS (85.8% vs. 87.8%, P = 0.729) rates were observed between HL and LL; the OS rates of HL and LL were similar.

Conclusion: In the group of ER+/PR+/HER2-patients, there was no significant prognostic difference between ER-low positive and ER-high positive groups, but low PR expression was significantly associated with a worse prognosis. The role of ER and PR balance in breast cancer progression and individualized treatment requires further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Journal
Breast Journal 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Breast Journal is the first comprehensive, multidisciplinary source devoted exclusively to all facets of research, diagnosis, and treatment of breast disease. The Breast Journal encompasses the latest news and technologies from the many medical specialties concerned with breast disease care in order to address the disease within the context of an integrated breast health care. This editorial philosophy recognizes the special social, sexual, and psychological considerations that distinguish cancer, and breast cancer in particular, from other serious diseases. Topics specifically within the scope of The Breast Journal include: Risk Factors Prevention Early Detection Diagnosis and Therapy Psychological Issues Quality of Life Biology of Breast Cancer.
期刊最新文献
Intramammary Tumor Location and Ipsilateral Lymphatic Spread in Early Breast Cancer Patients Using One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) Assay Relationship Between Mitochondrial Biological Function and Breast Cancer Unveiling miRNA30b’s Role in Suppressing ADAM12 to Combat Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Effect of Estrogen Receptor on the Relationship Between HER2 Immunohistochemistry Score and Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1