外科Apgar评分在预测普外科术后发病率和死亡率中的应用。

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY Turkish Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5631
Rajat Choudhari, Rahul Bhat, Keshav Prasad, Bhargava Vyas, Harish Rao, Shrirama Bhat
{"title":"外科Apgar评分在预测普外科术后发病率和死亡率中的应用。","authors":"Rajat Choudhari,&nbsp;Rahul Bhat,&nbsp;Keshav Prasad,&nbsp;Bhargava Vyas,&nbsp;Harish Rao,&nbsp;Shrirama Bhat","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Many surgical scoring systems are used to predict operative risk but most are complicated. The aim of the study was to determine the utility of the Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) in predicting post operative mortality and morbidity in general surgical cases.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational study. All adult patients for emergency and elective general surgical procedures were included. Intraoperative data was collected, and post operative outcomes were followed up till 30 days. SAS was calculated from intraoperative lowest heart rate, lowest MAP and blood loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 220 patients were included in the study. All consecutive general surgical procedures were included. Sixty of the 220 cases were emergency and the rest were elective. Forty-five (20.5%) of the patients developed complication. Mortality rate was 3.2% (7 out of 220). The cases were divided into high risk (0-4), moderate risk (5-8) and low risk (9-10) based on SAS. Complication and mortality rates were 50% and 8.3% in the high risk group, 23% and 3.7% in the moderate risk and 4.2% and 0 in the low risk group, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The surgical Apgar score is a simple and valid predictor of postoperative morbidity and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing general surgeries. It is applicable to all types of surgeries for emergency and elective cases and irrespective of the patient general condition and type of anesthesia and surgery planned.</p>","PeriodicalId":23374,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948664/pdf/TJS-38-266.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The utility of surgical Apgar score in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in general surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Rajat Choudhari,&nbsp;Rahul Bhat,&nbsp;Keshav Prasad,&nbsp;Bhargava Vyas,&nbsp;Harish Rao,&nbsp;Shrirama Bhat\",\"doi\":\"10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Many surgical scoring systems are used to predict operative risk but most are complicated. The aim of the study was to determine the utility of the Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) in predicting post operative mortality and morbidity in general surgical cases.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational study. All adult patients for emergency and elective general surgical procedures were included. Intraoperative data was collected, and post operative outcomes were followed up till 30 days. SAS was calculated from intraoperative lowest heart rate, lowest MAP and blood loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 220 patients were included in the study. All consecutive general surgical procedures were included. Sixty of the 220 cases were emergency and the rest were elective. Forty-five (20.5%) of the patients developed complication. Mortality rate was 3.2% (7 out of 220). The cases were divided into high risk (0-4), moderate risk (5-8) and low risk (9-10) based on SAS. Complication and mortality rates were 50% and 8.3% in the high risk group, 23% and 3.7% in the moderate risk and 4.2% and 0 in the low risk group, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The surgical Apgar score is a simple and valid predictor of postoperative morbidity and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing general surgeries. It is applicable to all types of surgeries for emergency and elective cases and irrespective of the patient general condition and type of anesthesia and surgery planned.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948664/pdf/TJS-38-266.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:许多手术评分系统用于预测手术风险,但大多数是复杂的。本研究的目的是确定外科Apgar评分(SAS)在预测普通外科病例术后死亡率和发病率方面的应用。材料和方法:这是一项前瞻性观察性研究。所有接受急诊和选择性普通外科手术的成年患者均包括在内。收集术中资料,随访至30天。SAS由术中最低心率、最低MAP和出血量计算。结果:共纳入220例患者。包括所有连续的普通外科手术。220个病例中有60个是急诊,其余是选择性的。45例(20.5%)患者出现并发症。死亡率为3.2%(220人中有7人死亡)。根据SAS分为高危(0-4)、中危(5-8)、低危(9-10)。高危组并发症和死亡率分别为50%和8.3%,中危组为23%和3.7%,低危组为4.2%和0。结论:手术Apgar评分是一种简单有效的预测普通手术患者术后发病率和30天死亡率的指标。它适用于所有类型的急诊和选择性病例的手术,无论患者的一般情况和麻醉类型和计划的手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The utility of surgical Apgar score in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in general surgery.

Objectives: Many surgical scoring systems are used to predict operative risk but most are complicated. The aim of the study was to determine the utility of the Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) in predicting post operative mortality and morbidity in general surgical cases.

Material and methods: This was a prospective observational study. All adult patients for emergency and elective general surgical procedures were included. Intraoperative data was collected, and post operative outcomes were followed up till 30 days. SAS was calculated from intraoperative lowest heart rate, lowest MAP and blood loss.

Results: A total of 220 patients were included in the study. All consecutive general surgical procedures were included. Sixty of the 220 cases were emergency and the rest were elective. Forty-five (20.5%) of the patients developed complication. Mortality rate was 3.2% (7 out of 220). The cases were divided into high risk (0-4), moderate risk (5-8) and low risk (9-10) based on SAS. Complication and mortality rates were 50% and 8.3% in the high risk group, 23% and 3.7% in the moderate risk and 4.2% and 0 in the low risk group, respectively.

Conclusion: The surgical Apgar score is a simple and valid predictor of postoperative morbidity and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing general surgeries. It is applicable to all types of surgeries for emergency and elective cases and irrespective of the patient general condition and type of anesthesia and surgery planned.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
FROM THE EDITOR'S DESK. Musinous cystic neoplasia mimicking hydatid cyst in the liver: Two rare cases Comments on ‘Percutaneous gas decompression can ease endoscopic derotation in sigmoid volvulus’ Pathological complete response and associated factors in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A retrospective study Effect of silver colloid dressing over conventional dressings in diabetic foot ulcer: A prospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1