人口、生态足迹与可持续发展目标。

IF 3.2 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Environmental & Resource Economics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s10640-021-00595-5
Partha Dasgupta, Aisha Dasgupta, Scott Barrett
{"title":"人口、生态足迹与可持续发展目标。","authors":"Partha Dasgupta,&nbsp;Aisha Dasgupta,&nbsp;Scott Barrett","doi":"10.1007/s10640-021-00595-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Anthropocene can be read as being the era when the demand humanity makes on the biosphere's goods and services-humanity's 'ecological footprint'-vastly exceeds its ability to supply it on a sustainable basis. Because the 'ecological' gap is met by a diminution of the biosphere, the inequality is increasing. We deploy estimates of the ecological gap, global GDP and its growth rates in recent years, and the rate at which natural capital has declined, to study three questions: (1) at what rate must efficiency at which Nature's services are converted into GDP rise if the UN's Sustainable Development Goals for year 2030 are to be sustainable; (2) what would a sustainable figure for world population be if global living standard is to be maintained at an acceptably high level? (3) What living standard could we aspire to if world population was to attain the UN's near lower-end projection for 2100 of 9 billion? While we take a global perspective, the reasoning we deploy may also be applied on a smaller scale. The base year we adopt for our computations is the pre-pandemic 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":48299,"journal":{"name":"Environmental & Resource Economics","volume":"84 3","pages":"659-675"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8594319/pdf/","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Population, Ecological Footprint and the Sustainable Development Goals.\",\"authors\":\"Partha Dasgupta,&nbsp;Aisha Dasgupta,&nbsp;Scott Barrett\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10640-021-00595-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Anthropocene can be read as being the era when the demand humanity makes on the biosphere's goods and services-humanity's 'ecological footprint'-vastly exceeds its ability to supply it on a sustainable basis. Because the 'ecological' gap is met by a diminution of the biosphere, the inequality is increasing. We deploy estimates of the ecological gap, global GDP and its growth rates in recent years, and the rate at which natural capital has declined, to study three questions: (1) at what rate must efficiency at which Nature's services are converted into GDP rise if the UN's Sustainable Development Goals for year 2030 are to be sustainable; (2) what would a sustainable figure for world population be if global living standard is to be maintained at an acceptably high level? (3) What living standard could we aspire to if world population was to attain the UN's near lower-end projection for 2100 of 9 billion? While we take a global perspective, the reasoning we deploy may also be applied on a smaller scale. The base year we adopt for our computations is the pre-pandemic 2019.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental & Resource Economics\",\"volume\":\"84 3\",\"pages\":\"659-675\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8594319/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental & Resource Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-021-00595-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental & Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-021-00595-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

人类世可以被解读为人类对生物圈的产品和服务的需求——人类的“生态足迹”——远远超过其在可持续基础上提供的能力的时代。由于“生态”差距是通过生物圈的减少来弥补的,因此不平等正在加剧。我们利用近年来的生态缺口、全球GDP及其增长率以及自然资本下降的速度来研究三个问题:(1)如果要实现联合国2030年可持续发展目标,自然服务转化为GDP的效率必须以多快的速度提高?(2)如果要将全球生活水平维持在一个可接受的高水平,世界人口的可持续数字是多少?(3)如果世界人口在2100年达到联合国预测的接近下限的90亿,我们的生活水平能达到什么水平?当我们采取全局视角时,我们部署的推理也可以应用于较小的规模。我们采用的计算基准年是2019年大流行前。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Population, Ecological Footprint and the Sustainable Development Goals.

The Anthropocene can be read as being the era when the demand humanity makes on the biosphere's goods and services-humanity's 'ecological footprint'-vastly exceeds its ability to supply it on a sustainable basis. Because the 'ecological' gap is met by a diminution of the biosphere, the inequality is increasing. We deploy estimates of the ecological gap, global GDP and its growth rates in recent years, and the rate at which natural capital has declined, to study three questions: (1) at what rate must efficiency at which Nature's services are converted into GDP rise if the UN's Sustainable Development Goals for year 2030 are to be sustainable; (2) what would a sustainable figure for world population be if global living standard is to be maintained at an acceptably high level? (3) What living standard could we aspire to if world population was to attain the UN's near lower-end projection for 2100 of 9 billion? While we take a global perspective, the reasoning we deploy may also be applied on a smaller scale. The base year we adopt for our computations is the pre-pandemic 2019.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: The primary concern of Environmental & Resource Economics (ERE) is the application of economic theory and methods to environmental issues and problems that require detailed analysis in order to improve management strategies. The contemporary environmental debate is in a constant state of flux and new or relatively unexplored topics are continually emerging. The Journal provides a forum for the further exploration of the causes, consequences and policy responses linked to these topics, across a range of spatial and temporal scales up to the global dimension. Contributions to the Journal should directly or indirectly be relevant to the policy formulation and application process. Areas of particular interest include: evaluation and development of instruments of environmental policy; cost-benefit and cost effectiveness analysis; sectoral environmental policy impact analysis; modelling and simulation; institutional arrangements; resource pricing and the valuation of environmental goods; environmental quality indicators. The editors wish to encourage a pluralistic approach to both theoretical and applied contributions. The publication of empirically based, policy-oriented research is given a high priority in the Journal in order to further critical discussion. Environmental & Resource Economics will also accept papers with an interdisciplinary approach, where this helps to improve knowledge of the real world complexities present, provided that the analysis retains links to or components of economic thinking. The Journal is required reading for economists, economic geographers and other academics, professionals and officials with a working interest in environmental matters.
期刊最新文献
Nudging the Food Basket Green: The Effects of Commitment and Badges on the Carbon Footprint of Food Shopping Willingness-to-Pay for Energy Efficiency: Evidence from the European Common Market Mosquitoes and Potatoes: How Local Climatic Conditions Impede Development Protecting Life and Lung: Protected Areas Affect Fine Particulate Matter and Respiratory Hospitalizations in the Brazilian Amazon Biome Nutrition and Climate Policies in the European Union: Friends or Enemies?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1