模拟注射阿片类激动剂治疗对过量和过量死亡的成本和影响

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108871
Wai Chung Tse , Nick Scott , Paul Dietze , Suzanne Nielsen
{"title":"模拟注射阿片类激动剂治疗对过量和过量死亡的成本和影响","authors":"Wai Chung Tse ,&nbsp;Nick Scott ,&nbsp;Paul Dietze ,&nbsp;Suzanne Nielsen","doi":"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>Unsupervised injectable opioid agonist<span> therapy (iOAT) may decrease the unmet treatment needs for people who inject opioids. We aimed to model whether unsupervised iOAT may be effective in reducing fatal and non–fatal overdose, and estimate the cost per life saved.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study used a decision tree model based on Australian and international parameters for overdose risk in people who inject opioids who are: not on OAT; new/stable to methadone/buprenorphine treatment; on iOAT; or on unsupervised iOAT. We modeled scenarios of (1) current OAT only (status quo), or current OAT plus either (2) 5% supervised iOAT, (3) 5% supervised or 5.69% unsupervised iOAT (based on willingness to enroll), OR (4) 1.2% supervised and 10% unsupervised iOAT (the same cost as scenario 2). The study measured overdoses (fatal and nonfatal) and treatment costs per 10,000 people who inject opioids per annum, and cost-per deaths averted on implementation of iOAT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>With current OAT, the study found an estimated 1655.5 (1552.7–1705.3) overdoses, 19.3 (17.9–20.3) overdose deaths and AUD 23,335,081 in treatment costs per 10,000 people per annum. Implementation of 5% enrollment in supervised iOAT costs an additional AUD 14,807,855 and showed a reduction of 122.9 (95% UI 114.2–130.5) overdoses and 2.0 (1.8–2.0) overdose deaths per 10,000 people per annum ($7,774,172 [7,283,182–8,146,989] per death averted). For the same treatment costs, additional coverage of 10% unsupervised iOAT and 1.2% supervised iOAT could be achieved, which the study estimated to prevent 269.0 (95% UI 250.0–278.7) overdoses and 4.0 (3.7–4.2) overdose deaths per 10,000 people per annum ($3,723,340 (3,385,878–3,894,379) per death averted), alongside further benefits of treatment unaccounted for in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>An implementation scenario with greater unsupervised iOAT compared to supervised iOAT allows for an increased reduction in overdose and overdose deaths per annum at the same cost, with the additional benefit of increased treatment coverage among people who inject opioids.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 108871"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling the cost and impact of injectable opioid agonist therapy on overdose and overdose deaths\",\"authors\":\"Wai Chung Tse ,&nbsp;Nick Scott ,&nbsp;Paul Dietze ,&nbsp;Suzanne Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>Unsupervised injectable opioid agonist<span> therapy (iOAT) may decrease the unmet treatment needs for people who inject opioids. We aimed to model whether unsupervised iOAT may be effective in reducing fatal and non–fatal overdose, and estimate the cost per life saved.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study used a decision tree model based on Australian and international parameters for overdose risk in people who inject opioids who are: not on OAT; new/stable to methadone/buprenorphine treatment; on iOAT; or on unsupervised iOAT. We modeled scenarios of (1) current OAT only (status quo), or current OAT plus either (2) 5% supervised iOAT, (3) 5% supervised or 5.69% unsupervised iOAT (based on willingness to enroll), OR (4) 1.2% supervised and 10% unsupervised iOAT (the same cost as scenario 2). The study measured overdoses (fatal and nonfatal) and treatment costs per 10,000 people who inject opioids per annum, and cost-per deaths averted on implementation of iOAT.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>With current OAT, the study found an estimated 1655.5 (1552.7–1705.3) overdoses, 19.3 (17.9–20.3) overdose deaths and AUD 23,335,081 in treatment costs per 10,000 people per annum. Implementation of 5% enrollment in supervised iOAT costs an additional AUD 14,807,855 and showed a reduction of 122.9 (95% UI 114.2–130.5) overdoses and 2.0 (1.8–2.0) overdose deaths per 10,000 people per annum ($7,774,172 [7,283,182–8,146,989] per death averted). For the same treatment costs, additional coverage of 10% unsupervised iOAT and 1.2% supervised iOAT could be achieved, which the study estimated to prevent 269.0 (95% UI 250.0–278.7) overdoses and 4.0 (3.7–4.2) overdose deaths per 10,000 people per annum ($3,723,340 (3,385,878–3,894,379) per death averted), alongside further benefits of treatment unaccounted for in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>An implementation scenario with greater unsupervised iOAT compared to supervised iOAT allows for an increased reduction in overdose and overdose deaths per annum at the same cost, with the additional benefit of increased treatment coverage among people who inject opioids.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment\",\"volume\":\"143 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222001532\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740547222001532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

AimsUnsupervised注射阿片类激动剂治疗(iOAT)可能会减少未满足的治疗需求的人注射阿片类药物。我们的目的是建立无监督iOAT是否可以有效减少致命和非致命过量的模型,并估计每挽救一条生命的成本。方法:该研究使用基于澳大利亚和国际参数的决策树模型,用于注射阿片类药物的人的过量风险:不服用OAT;美沙酮/丁丙诺啡治疗新/稳定;iOAT;或在无监督的iOAT上。我们模拟了(1)仅当前OAT(现状),或当前OAT加上(2)5%监督iOAT,(3) 5%监督iOAT或5.69%无监督iOAT(基于报名意愿),或(4)1.2%监督iOAT和10%无监督iOAT(与方案2相同的成本)的情景。该研究测量了每年每10,000名注射阿片类药物的过量(致命和非致命)和治疗成本,以及实施iOAT避免的每例死亡成本。根据目前的OAT,该研究发现,估计有1655.5(1552.7-1705.3)例过量用药,19.3(17.9-20.3)例过量死亡,每1万人每年的治疗费用为23,335,081澳元。在有监督的iOAT中实施5%的入学率需要额外花费14,807,855澳元,并且显示每年每10,000人中减少122.9 (95% UI 114.2-130.5)过量使用和2.0(1.8-2.0)过量使用死亡(每个避免死亡$7,774,172[7,283,182-8,146,989])。对于相同的治疗费用,可以实现10%的无监督iOAT和1.2%的监督iOAT的额外覆盖,该研究估计每10,000人中每年可预防269.0 (95% UI 250.0-278.7)过量使用和4.0(3.7-4.2)过量使用死亡(每避免死亡3,723,340美元(3,385,878-3,894,379)),以及本研究中未考虑的治疗的进一步益处。结论:与有监督的iOAT相比,无监督iOAT的实施方案允许以相同的成本增加每年过量和过量死亡的减少,并增加了注射阿片类药物人群的治疗覆盖率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling the cost and impact of injectable opioid agonist therapy on overdose and overdose deaths

Aims

Unsupervised injectable opioid agonist therapy (iOAT) may decrease the unmet treatment needs for people who inject opioids. We aimed to model whether unsupervised iOAT may be effective in reducing fatal and non–fatal overdose, and estimate the cost per life saved.

Methods

The study used a decision tree model based on Australian and international parameters for overdose risk in people who inject opioids who are: not on OAT; new/stable to methadone/buprenorphine treatment; on iOAT; or on unsupervised iOAT. We modeled scenarios of (1) current OAT only (status quo), or current OAT plus either (2) 5% supervised iOAT, (3) 5% supervised or 5.69% unsupervised iOAT (based on willingness to enroll), OR (4) 1.2% supervised and 10% unsupervised iOAT (the same cost as scenario 2). The study measured overdoses (fatal and nonfatal) and treatment costs per 10,000 people who inject opioids per annum, and cost-per deaths averted on implementation of iOAT.

Results

With current OAT, the study found an estimated 1655.5 (1552.7–1705.3) overdoses, 19.3 (17.9–20.3) overdose deaths and AUD 23,335,081 in treatment costs per 10,000 people per annum. Implementation of 5% enrollment in supervised iOAT costs an additional AUD 14,807,855 and showed a reduction of 122.9 (95% UI 114.2–130.5) overdoses and 2.0 (1.8–2.0) overdose deaths per 10,000 people per annum ($7,774,172 [7,283,182–8,146,989] per death averted). For the same treatment costs, additional coverage of 10% unsupervised iOAT and 1.2% supervised iOAT could be achieved, which the study estimated to prevent 269.0 (95% UI 250.0–278.7) overdoses and 4.0 (3.7–4.2) overdose deaths per 10,000 people per annum ($3,723,340 (3,385,878–3,894,379) per death averted), alongside further benefits of treatment unaccounted for in this study.

Conclusion

An implementation scenario with greater unsupervised iOAT compared to supervised iOAT allows for an increased reduction in overdose and overdose deaths per annum at the same cost, with the additional benefit of increased treatment coverage among people who inject opioids.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: The Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (JSAT) features original reviews, training and educational articles, special commentary, and especially research articles that are meaningful to the treatment of alcohol, heroin, marijuana, and other drugs of dependence. JSAT is directed toward treatment practitioners from all disciplines (medicine, nursing, social work, psychology, and counseling) in both private and public sectors, including those involved in schools, health centers, community agencies, correctional facilities, and individual practices. The editors emphasize that JSAT articles should address techniques and treatment approaches that can be used directly by contemporary practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Not in my treatment center: Leadership's perception of barriers to MOUD adoption Peer support to reduce readmission in Medicaid-enrolled adults with substance use disorder National trends in buprenorphine prescribing before and during the COVID-19 pandemic A qualitative analysis of barriers to opioid agonist treatment for racial/ethnic minoritized populations An intervention pilot to facilitate harm reduction service decentralization in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1