金金丝猴(Rhinopithecus roxellana)单手进食、两足运动和社会梳理中肢体偏好的一致性。

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Laterality Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/1357650X.2022.2141251
Weiwei Fu, Jianghui Xu, Xiaowei Wang, Yongbo Li, Shujun He, Chengliang Wang, Yi Ren, Bin Yang, Tong Wu, Yan Wang, Baoguo Li
{"title":"金金丝猴(Rhinopithecus roxellana)单手进食、两足运动和社会梳理中肢体偏好的一致性。","authors":"Weiwei Fu,&nbsp;Jianghui Xu,&nbsp;Xiaowei Wang,&nbsp;Yongbo Li,&nbsp;Shujun He,&nbsp;Chengliang Wang,&nbsp;Yi Ren,&nbsp;Bin Yang,&nbsp;Tong Wu,&nbsp;Yan Wang,&nbsp;Baoguo Li","doi":"10.1080/1357650X.2022.2141251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The golden snub-nosed monkey (<i>Rhinopithecus roxellana</i>) is a typical arboreal group-living Old World primate. While limb preference has been extensively studied in this species, limb preference consistency has not yet been explored. Here, based on 26 <i>R. roxellana</i> adults, we investigated whether individuals exhibit consistent motor biases in manual- (e.g., unimanual feeding and social grooming) and foot-related (e.g., bipedal locomotion) tasks and whether limb preference consistency is influenced by increased social interactions during social grooming. Results showed no consistency in the direction or strength of limb preference among tasks, except for lateral strength in handedness for unimanual feeding and footedness in the initiation of locomotion. Population-level foot preference was only found among right-handers. Marked lateral bias was found in unimanual feeding, indicating that it may be a sensitive behavioural measure for assessing manual preference, especially for provisioned populations. This study not only improves our understanding of the relationship between hand and foot preference in <i>R. roxellana</i> but also reveals potential differential hemispheric regulation of limb preference and the influence of increased social interaction on handedness consistency.</p>","PeriodicalId":47387,"journal":{"name":"Laterality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consistency of limb preference across unimanual feeding, bipedal locomotion, and social grooming in golden snub-nosed monkeys (<i>Rhinopithecus roxellana</i>).\",\"authors\":\"Weiwei Fu,&nbsp;Jianghui Xu,&nbsp;Xiaowei Wang,&nbsp;Yongbo Li,&nbsp;Shujun He,&nbsp;Chengliang Wang,&nbsp;Yi Ren,&nbsp;Bin Yang,&nbsp;Tong Wu,&nbsp;Yan Wang,&nbsp;Baoguo Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1357650X.2022.2141251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The golden snub-nosed monkey (<i>Rhinopithecus roxellana</i>) is a typical arboreal group-living Old World primate. While limb preference has been extensively studied in this species, limb preference consistency has not yet been explored. Here, based on 26 <i>R. roxellana</i> adults, we investigated whether individuals exhibit consistent motor biases in manual- (e.g., unimanual feeding and social grooming) and foot-related (e.g., bipedal locomotion) tasks and whether limb preference consistency is influenced by increased social interactions during social grooming. Results showed no consistency in the direction or strength of limb preference among tasks, except for lateral strength in handedness for unimanual feeding and footedness in the initiation of locomotion. Population-level foot preference was only found among right-handers. Marked lateral bias was found in unimanual feeding, indicating that it may be a sensitive behavioural measure for assessing manual preference, especially for provisioned populations. This study not only improves our understanding of the relationship between hand and foot preference in <i>R. roxellana</i> but also reveals potential differential hemispheric regulation of limb preference and the influence of increased social interaction on handedness consistency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laterality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laterality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2022.2141251\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laterality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2022.2141251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

金金丝猴(Rhinopithecus roxellana)是一种典型的东半球群居灵长类动物。虽然该物种的肢体偏好已被广泛研究,但肢体偏好的一致性尚未得到探讨。本文以26只成虫为研究对象,研究了个体在手动(如单手进食和社交梳理)和足部相关(如双足运动)任务中是否表现出一致的运动偏好,以及在社交梳理过程中,肢体偏好的一致性是否受到社会互动增加的影响。结果显示,在不同的任务中,肢体偏好的方向和强度没有一致性,除了在单手进食时的侧向强度和在运动开始时的足性。人口水平的脚偏好只在右撇子中发现。在单人工喂养中发现了明显的侧偏,表明它可能是评估人工偏好的敏感行为措施,特别是对于供应的种群。本研究不仅提高了我们对小红花手足偏好关系的认识,而且揭示了不同半球对肢体偏好的潜在差异调节以及社会交往增加对利手性一致性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consistency of limb preference across unimanual feeding, bipedal locomotion, and social grooming in golden snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana).

The golden snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellana) is a typical arboreal group-living Old World primate. While limb preference has been extensively studied in this species, limb preference consistency has not yet been explored. Here, based on 26 R. roxellana adults, we investigated whether individuals exhibit consistent motor biases in manual- (e.g., unimanual feeding and social grooming) and foot-related (e.g., bipedal locomotion) tasks and whether limb preference consistency is influenced by increased social interactions during social grooming. Results showed no consistency in the direction or strength of limb preference among tasks, except for lateral strength in handedness for unimanual feeding and footedness in the initiation of locomotion. Population-level foot preference was only found among right-handers. Marked lateral bias was found in unimanual feeding, indicating that it may be a sensitive behavioural measure for assessing manual preference, especially for provisioned populations. This study not only improves our understanding of the relationship between hand and foot preference in R. roxellana but also reveals potential differential hemispheric regulation of limb preference and the influence of increased social interaction on handedness consistency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laterality
Laterality Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition publishes high quality research on all aspects of lateralisation in humans and non-human species. Laterality"s principal interest is in the psychological, behavioural and neurological correlates of lateralisation. The editors will also consider accessible papers from any discipline which can illuminate the general problems of the evolution of biological and neural asymmetry, papers on the cultural, linguistic, artistic and social consequences of lateral asymmetry, and papers on its historical origins and development. The interests of workers in laterality are typically broad.
期刊最新文献
Auditory perceptual ability affects dichotic listening performance in older adults. The effect of ocular dominance on choroidal structures. Artistic turns: laterality in paintings of kisses and embraces A task-dependent analysis of closed vs. open and fine vs. gross motor skills in handedness. Fear is more right lateralized than happiness and anger: Evidence for the motivational hypothesis of emotional face perception?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1