12小时后序列ROX-Index评分预测高流量鼻插管供氧患者治疗失败和死亡率的验证

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Canadian respiratory journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/7474564
Dimitris Basoulis, Pantelis Avramopoulos, Maria Aggelara, Georgios Karamanakos, Pantazis-Michail Voutsinas, Amalia Karapanou, Mina Psichogiou, Michalis Samarkos, Foteini Ntziora, Nikolaos V Sipsas
{"title":"12小时后序列ROX-Index评分预测高流量鼻插管供氧患者治疗失败和死亡率的验证","authors":"Dimitris Basoulis,&nbsp;Pantelis Avramopoulos,&nbsp;Maria Aggelara,&nbsp;Georgios Karamanakos,&nbsp;Pantazis-Michail Voutsinas,&nbsp;Amalia Karapanou,&nbsp;Mina Psichogiou,&nbsp;Michalis Samarkos,&nbsp;Foteini Ntziora,&nbsp;Nikolaos V Sipsas","doi":"10.1155/2023/7474564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is an oxygen delivery method shown to reduce the risk of intubation and mortality in patients with type 1 respiratory failure. The ROX-index score can predict HFNC failure. This study aims to evaluate sequential ROX-index assessments as predictors of HFNC failure and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective observational single-center study including all adult patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR placed under HFNC from 1st November 2020 to 31st May 2021, and patients with hemodynamic instability or unable to tolerate HFNC were excluded. The primary endpoint was successful HFNC de-escalation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In univariate analysis, HFNC de-escalation was associated with younger age (59.2 ± 14 vs. 67.7 ± 10.5 and <i>p</i> < 0.001), lower levels of serum lactate (1.1 vs. 1.5 and <i>p</i>=0.013), and higher ROX-index at 12 hrs (5.09 vs. 4.13 and <i>p</i> < 0.001). ROC curve analysis of ROX-index at 12 hrs yielded a c-statistic of 71.2% (95% CI 61.6-80.9 and <i>p</i> < 0.001). ROX-index at 12 hrs and age retained significance in multivariate analysis. Using an optimal cutoff point of 4.43, we calculated a sensitivity of 64.5% and specificity of 69.6%. In univariate survival analysis, older age (68.8 ± 9.7 vs. 58.9 ± 13.9 and <i>p</i> < 0.001), greater creatinine values (0.96 vs. 0.84 and <i>p</i>=0.022), greater SOFA score (<i>p</i>=0.039), and a lower 12 hrs ROX-index (4.22 vs. 4.95 and <i>p</i>=0.02) were associated with hospital mortality. The SOFA score and age retained significance in multivariate survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ROX-index is proven to be a valuable and easy-to-use tool for clinicians in the assessment of COVID-19 patients under HFNC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9416,"journal":{"name":"Canadian respiratory journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931457/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Sequential ROX-Index Score Beyond 12 Hours in Predicting Treatment Failure and Mortality in COVID-19 Patients Receiving Oxygen via High-Flow Nasal Cannula.\",\"authors\":\"Dimitris Basoulis,&nbsp;Pantelis Avramopoulos,&nbsp;Maria Aggelara,&nbsp;Georgios Karamanakos,&nbsp;Pantazis-Michail Voutsinas,&nbsp;Amalia Karapanou,&nbsp;Mina Psichogiou,&nbsp;Michalis Samarkos,&nbsp;Foteini Ntziora,&nbsp;Nikolaos V Sipsas\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/7474564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is an oxygen delivery method shown to reduce the risk of intubation and mortality in patients with type 1 respiratory failure. The ROX-index score can predict HFNC failure. This study aims to evaluate sequential ROX-index assessments as predictors of HFNC failure and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective observational single-center study including all adult patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR placed under HFNC from 1st November 2020 to 31st May 2021, and patients with hemodynamic instability or unable to tolerate HFNC were excluded. The primary endpoint was successful HFNC de-escalation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In univariate analysis, HFNC de-escalation was associated with younger age (59.2 ± 14 vs. 67.7 ± 10.5 and <i>p</i> < 0.001), lower levels of serum lactate (1.1 vs. 1.5 and <i>p</i>=0.013), and higher ROX-index at 12 hrs (5.09 vs. 4.13 and <i>p</i> < 0.001). ROC curve analysis of ROX-index at 12 hrs yielded a c-statistic of 71.2% (95% CI 61.6-80.9 and <i>p</i> < 0.001). ROX-index at 12 hrs and age retained significance in multivariate analysis. Using an optimal cutoff point of 4.43, we calculated a sensitivity of 64.5% and specificity of 69.6%. In univariate survival analysis, older age (68.8 ± 9.7 vs. 58.9 ± 13.9 and <i>p</i> < 0.001), greater creatinine values (0.96 vs. 0.84 and <i>p</i>=0.022), greater SOFA score (<i>p</i>=0.039), and a lower 12 hrs ROX-index (4.22 vs. 4.95 and <i>p</i>=0.02) were associated with hospital mortality. The SOFA score and age retained significance in multivariate survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ROX-index is proven to be a valuable and easy-to-use tool for clinicians in the assessment of COVID-19 patients under HFNC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian respiratory journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931457/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian respiratory journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7474564\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian respiratory journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7474564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:高流量鼻插管(HFNC)是一种供氧方法,可降低1型呼吸衰竭患者的插管风险和死亡率。ROX-index评分可预测HFNC失败。本研究旨在评估顺序rox指数评估作为HFNC失败和死亡率的预测因子。方法:前瞻性观察性单中心研究,纳入2020年11月1日至2021年5月31日在HFNC下放置的所有SARS-CoV-2 PCR阳性的成年患者,排除血液动力学不稳定或不能耐受HFNC的患者。主要终点是HFNC降级成功。结果:在单因素分析中,HFNC降级与年龄较小(59.2±14比67.7±10.5,p < 0.001)、血清乳酸水平较低(1.1比1.5,p=0.013)、12小时rox指数较高(5.09比4.13,p < 0.001)相关。ROC曲线分析12小时rox指数的c统计量为71.2% (95% CI 61.6 ~ 80.9, p < 0.001)。12小时rox指数和年龄在多变量分析中保持显著性。使用4.43的最佳截断点,我们计算出敏感性为64.5%,特异性为69.6%。在单因素生存分析中,年龄较大(68.8±9.7比58.9±13.9,p < 0.001)、肌酐值较大(0.96比0.84,p=0.022)、SOFA评分较高(p=0.039)、12小时rox指数较低(4.22比4.95,p=0.02)与住院死亡率相关。SOFA评分和年龄在多变量生存分析中仍具有重要意义。结论:ROX-index是临床医生在HFNC下评估COVID-19患者的一种有价值且易于使用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of Sequential ROX-Index Score Beyond 12 Hours in Predicting Treatment Failure and Mortality in COVID-19 Patients Receiving Oxygen via High-Flow Nasal Cannula.

Background: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is an oxygen delivery method shown to reduce the risk of intubation and mortality in patients with type 1 respiratory failure. The ROX-index score can predict HFNC failure. This study aims to evaluate sequential ROX-index assessments as predictors of HFNC failure and mortality.

Methods: Prospective observational single-center study including all adult patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR placed under HFNC from 1st November 2020 to 31st May 2021, and patients with hemodynamic instability or unable to tolerate HFNC were excluded. The primary endpoint was successful HFNC de-escalation.

Results: In univariate analysis, HFNC de-escalation was associated with younger age (59.2 ± 14 vs. 67.7 ± 10.5 and p < 0.001), lower levels of serum lactate (1.1 vs. 1.5 and p=0.013), and higher ROX-index at 12 hrs (5.09 vs. 4.13 and p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis of ROX-index at 12 hrs yielded a c-statistic of 71.2% (95% CI 61.6-80.9 and p < 0.001). ROX-index at 12 hrs and age retained significance in multivariate analysis. Using an optimal cutoff point of 4.43, we calculated a sensitivity of 64.5% and specificity of 69.6%. In univariate survival analysis, older age (68.8 ± 9.7 vs. 58.9 ± 13.9 and p < 0.001), greater creatinine values (0.96 vs. 0.84 and p=0.022), greater SOFA score (p=0.039), and a lower 12 hrs ROX-index (4.22 vs. 4.95 and p=0.02) were associated with hospital mortality. The SOFA score and age retained significance in multivariate survival analysis.

Conclusion: ROX-index is proven to be a valuable and easy-to-use tool for clinicians in the assessment of COVID-19 patients under HFNC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian respiratory journal
Canadian respiratory journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Respiratory Journal is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that aims to provide a multidisciplinary forum for research in all areas of respiratory medicine. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to asthma, allergy, COPD, non-invasive ventilation, therapeutic intervention, lung cancer, airway and lung infections, as well as any other respiratory diseases.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Analysis of 32 Cases of Subglottic Benign Airway Stenosis Treated With Montgomery T Silicone Stent. Nomograms for Predicting High Hospitalization Costs and Prolonged Stay among Hospitalized Patients with pAECOPD. Gentiopicroside Ameliorates Sepsis-Induced Acute Lung Injury via Inhibiting Inflammatory Response. Development of Prone Position Ventilation Device and Study on the Application Effect of Combined Life Support Technology in Critically Ill Patients. IL-17 Mildly Rescued the Impaired Proliferation of Alveolar Epithelial Cells Induced by LCN2 Overexpression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1