x射线约束波函数法的加权方案的介绍:优点和缺点。

IF 1.9 4区 材料科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1107/S2053273322010221
Giovanni Macetti, Alessandro Genoni
{"title":"x射线约束波函数法的加权方案的介绍:优点和缺点。","authors":"Giovanni Macetti,&nbsp;Alessandro Genoni","doi":"10.1107/S2053273322010221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a quite recent study [Genoni et al. (2017). IUCrJ, 4, 136-146], it was observed that the X-ray restrained wavefunction (XRW) approach allows a more efficient and larger capture of electron correlation effects on the electron density if high-angle reflections are not considered in the calculations. This is due to the occurrence of two concomitant effects when one uses theoretical X-ray diffraction data corresponding to a single-molecule electron density in a large unit cell: (i) the high-angle reflections are generally much more numerous than the low- and medium-angle ones, and (ii) they are already very well described at unrestrained level. Nevertheless, since high-angle data also contain important information that should not be disregarded, it is not advisable to neglect them completely. For this reason, based on the results of the previous investigation, this work introduces a weighting scheme for XRW calculations to up-weight the contribution of low- and medium-angle reflections, and, at the same time, to reasonably down-weight the importance of the high-angle data. The proposed strategy was tested through XRW computations with both theoretical and experimental structure-factor amplitudes. The tests have shown that the new weighting scheme works optimally if it is applied with theoretically generated X-ray diffraction data, while it is not advantageous when traditional experimental X-ray diffraction data (even of very high resolution) are employed. This also led to the conclusion that the use of a specific external parameter λ<sub>J</sub> for each resolution range might not be a suitable strategy to adopt in XRW calculations exploiting experimental X-ray data as restraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":106,"journal":{"name":"Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances","volume":"79 Pt 1","pages":"25-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction of a weighting scheme for the X-ray restrained wavefunction approach: advantages and drawbacks.\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Macetti,&nbsp;Alessandro Genoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1107/S2053273322010221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In a quite recent study [Genoni et al. (2017). IUCrJ, 4, 136-146], it was observed that the X-ray restrained wavefunction (XRW) approach allows a more efficient and larger capture of electron correlation effects on the electron density if high-angle reflections are not considered in the calculations. This is due to the occurrence of two concomitant effects when one uses theoretical X-ray diffraction data corresponding to a single-molecule electron density in a large unit cell: (i) the high-angle reflections are generally much more numerous than the low- and medium-angle ones, and (ii) they are already very well described at unrestrained level. Nevertheless, since high-angle data also contain important information that should not be disregarded, it is not advisable to neglect them completely. For this reason, based on the results of the previous investigation, this work introduces a weighting scheme for XRW calculations to up-weight the contribution of low- and medium-angle reflections, and, at the same time, to reasonably down-weight the importance of the high-angle data. The proposed strategy was tested through XRW computations with both theoretical and experimental structure-factor amplitudes. The tests have shown that the new weighting scheme works optimally if it is applied with theoretically generated X-ray diffraction data, while it is not advantageous when traditional experimental X-ray diffraction data (even of very high resolution) are employed. This also led to the conclusion that the use of a specific external parameter λ<sub>J</sub> for each resolution range might not be a suitable strategy to adopt in XRW calculations exploiting experimental X-ray data as restraints.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances\",\"volume\":\"79 Pt 1\",\"pages\":\"25-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053273322010221\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053273322010221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在最近的一项研究中[Genoni et al.(2017)]。IUCrJ, 4, 136-146],观察到如果在计算中不考虑高角度反射,x射线约束波函数(XRW)方法可以更有效和更大地捕获电子密度对电子相关效应的影响。这是由于当人们使用理论x射线衍射数据对应于大单位电池中的单分子电子密度时,两种伴随效应的发生:(i)高角度反射通常比低角度和中角度反射多得多,(ii)它们已经在不受约束的水平上得到了很好的描述。然而,由于高角度数据也包含了不可忽视的重要信息,因此完全忽视它们是不可取的。因此,在前人研究成果的基础上,本文引入了一种XRW计算的加权方案,以提高低角度和中角度反射的权重,同时合理降低高角度数据的重要性。通过理论和实验结构因子振幅的XRW计算验证了所提出的策略。实验结果表明,新的加权方案在理论生成的x射线衍射数据中效果最佳,而在传统的实验x射线衍射数据(即使是非常高的分辨率)中效果不佳。这也得出结论,在利用实验x射线数据作为约束的XRW计算中,对每个分辨率范围使用特定的外部参数λJ可能不是一个合适的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introduction of a weighting scheme for the X-ray restrained wavefunction approach: advantages and drawbacks.

In a quite recent study [Genoni et al. (2017). IUCrJ, 4, 136-146], it was observed that the X-ray restrained wavefunction (XRW) approach allows a more efficient and larger capture of electron correlation effects on the electron density if high-angle reflections are not considered in the calculations. This is due to the occurrence of two concomitant effects when one uses theoretical X-ray diffraction data corresponding to a single-molecule electron density in a large unit cell: (i) the high-angle reflections are generally much more numerous than the low- and medium-angle ones, and (ii) they are already very well described at unrestrained level. Nevertheless, since high-angle data also contain important information that should not be disregarded, it is not advisable to neglect them completely. For this reason, based on the results of the previous investigation, this work introduces a weighting scheme for XRW calculations to up-weight the contribution of low- and medium-angle reflections, and, at the same time, to reasonably down-weight the importance of the high-angle data. The proposed strategy was tested through XRW computations with both theoretical and experimental structure-factor amplitudes. The tests have shown that the new weighting scheme works optimally if it is applied with theoretically generated X-ray diffraction data, while it is not advantageous when traditional experimental X-ray diffraction data (even of very high resolution) are employed. This also led to the conclusion that the use of a specific external parameter λJ for each resolution range might not be a suitable strategy to adopt in XRW calculations exploiting experimental X-ray data as restraints.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances
Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARYCRYSTALLOGRAPH-CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
419
期刊介绍: Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations and Advances publishes articles reporting advances in the theory and practice of all areas of crystallography in the broadest sense. As well as traditional crystallography, this includes nanocrystals, metacrystals, amorphous materials, quasicrystals, synchrotron and XFEL studies, coherent scattering, diffraction imaging, time-resolved studies and the structure of strain and defects in materials. The journal has two parts, a rapid-publication Advances section and the traditional Foundations section. Articles for the Advances section are of particularly high value and impact. They receive expedited treatment and may be highlighted by an accompanying scientific commentary article and a press release. Further details are given in the November 2013 Editorial. The central themes of the journal are, on the one hand, experimental and theoretical studies of the properties and arrangements of atoms, ions and molecules in condensed matter, periodic, quasiperiodic or amorphous, ideal or real, and, on the other, the theoretical and experimental aspects of the various methods to determine these properties and arrangements.
期刊最新文献
Complete classification of six-dimensional iso-edge domains. The general equation of δ direct methods and the novel SMAR algorithm residuals using the absolute value of ρ and the zero conversion of negative ripples. Periodic graphs with coincident edges: folding-ladder and related graphs. Influence of device configuration and noise on a machine learning predictor for the selection of nanoparticle small-angle X-ray scattering models. An alternative method to the Takagi-Taupin equations for studying dark-field X-ray microscopy of deformed crystals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1