初级保健提供者在慢性非癌性疼痛患者护理中发现的差距的范围审查。

Virginia McEwen, Mihal Michelle Esterlis, R Gianni Lorello, Abhimanyu Sud, F Marina Englesakis, Anuj Bhatia
{"title":"初级保健提供者在慢性非癌性疼痛患者护理中发现的差距的范围审查。","authors":"Virginia McEwen,&nbsp;Mihal Michelle Esterlis,&nbsp;R Gianni Lorello,&nbsp;Abhimanyu Sud,&nbsp;F Marina Englesakis,&nbsp;Anuj Bhatia","doi":"10.1080/24740527.2022.2145940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/aim: </strong>Primary care providers (PCPs), who provide the bulk of care for patients with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP), often report knowledge gaps, limited resources, and difficult patient encounters while managing chronic pain. This scoping review seeks to evaluate gaps identified by PCPs in providing care to patients with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Arksey and O'Malley framework was used for this scoping review. A broad literature search was conducted for relevant articles on gaps in knowledge and skills of PCPs and in their health care environment for managing chronic pain, with multiple search term derivatives for concepts of interest. Articles from the initial search were screened for relevance, yielding 31 studies. Inductive and deductive thematic analysis was adopted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The studies included in this review reflected a variety of study designs, settings, and methods. However, consistent themes emerged with respect to gaps in knowledge and skills for assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and interprofessional roles in chronic pain, as well as broader systemic issues including attitudes toward CNCP. A general lack of confidence in tapering high dose or ineffective opioid regimes, professional isolation, challenges in managing patients with CNCP with complex needs, and limited access to pain specialists were reported by PCPs.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusions: </strong>This scoping review revealed common elements across the selected studies that will be useful in guiding creation of targeted supports for PCPs to manage CNCP. This review also yielded insights for pain clinicians at tertiary centers for supporting their PCP colleagues as well as systemic reforms required to support patients with CNCP.</p>","PeriodicalId":53214,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","volume":"7 1","pages":"2145940"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Scoping Review of Gaps Identified by Primary Care Providers in Caring for Patients with Chronic Noncancer Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Virginia McEwen,&nbsp;Mihal Michelle Esterlis,&nbsp;R Gianni Lorello,&nbsp;Abhimanyu Sud,&nbsp;F Marina Englesakis,&nbsp;Anuj Bhatia\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24740527.2022.2145940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction/aim: </strong>Primary care providers (PCPs), who provide the bulk of care for patients with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP), often report knowledge gaps, limited resources, and difficult patient encounters while managing chronic pain. This scoping review seeks to evaluate gaps identified by PCPs in providing care to patients with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Arksey and O'Malley framework was used for this scoping review. A broad literature search was conducted for relevant articles on gaps in knowledge and skills of PCPs and in their health care environment for managing chronic pain, with multiple search term derivatives for concepts of interest. Articles from the initial search were screened for relevance, yielding 31 studies. Inductive and deductive thematic analysis was adopted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The studies included in this review reflected a variety of study designs, settings, and methods. However, consistent themes emerged with respect to gaps in knowledge and skills for assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and interprofessional roles in chronic pain, as well as broader systemic issues including attitudes toward CNCP. A general lack of confidence in tapering high dose or ineffective opioid regimes, professional isolation, challenges in managing patients with CNCP with complex needs, and limited access to pain specialists were reported by PCPs.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusions: </strong>This scoping review revealed common elements across the selected studies that will be useful in guiding creation of targeted supports for PCPs to manage CNCP. This review also yielded insights for pain clinicians at tertiary centers for supporting their PCP colleagues as well as systemic reforms required to support patients with CNCP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"2145940\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980640/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2022.2145940\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2022.2145940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介/目的:初级保健提供者(pcp)为慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)患者提供大量护理,在管理慢性疼痛时经常报告知识差距,资源有限和患者遇到困难。本综述旨在评估pcp在为慢性疼痛患者提供护理方面的差距。方法:采用Arksey和O'Malley框架进行范围综述。广泛的文献检索进行了相关文章的知识和技能差距的pcp和他们的卫生保健环境管理慢性疼痛,与多个搜索词衍生感兴趣的概念。对最初搜索的文章进行相关性筛选,得到31篇研究。采用归纳和演绎的主题分析方法。结果:本综述纳入的研究反映了多种研究设计、设置和方法。然而,一致的主题出现在评估、诊断、治疗和慢性疼痛跨专业角色的知识和技能方面的差距,以及更广泛的系统性问题,包括对CNCP的态度。pcp报告了对逐渐减少高剂量或无效阿片类药物治疗方案普遍缺乏信心、专业隔离、管理具有复杂需求的CNCP患者的挑战以及获得疼痛专家的机会有限。讨论/结论:该范围审查揭示了所选研究的共同要素,这些要素将有助于指导为pcp管理CNCP提供有针对性的支持。这篇综述也为三级中心的疼痛临床医生提供了见解,以支持他们的PCP同事,以及支持CNCP患者所需的系统改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Scoping Review of Gaps Identified by Primary Care Providers in Caring for Patients with Chronic Noncancer Pain.

Introduction/aim: Primary care providers (PCPs), who provide the bulk of care for patients with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP), often report knowledge gaps, limited resources, and difficult patient encounters while managing chronic pain. This scoping review seeks to evaluate gaps identified by PCPs in providing care to patients with chronic pain.

Methods: The Arksey and O'Malley framework was used for this scoping review. A broad literature search was conducted for relevant articles on gaps in knowledge and skills of PCPs and in their health care environment for managing chronic pain, with multiple search term derivatives for concepts of interest. Articles from the initial search were screened for relevance, yielding 31 studies. Inductive and deductive thematic analysis was adopted.

Results: The studies included in this review reflected a variety of study designs, settings, and methods. However, consistent themes emerged with respect to gaps in knowledge and skills for assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and interprofessional roles in chronic pain, as well as broader systemic issues including attitudes toward CNCP. A general lack of confidence in tapering high dose or ineffective opioid regimes, professional isolation, challenges in managing patients with CNCP with complex needs, and limited access to pain specialists were reported by PCPs.

Discussion/conclusions: This scoping review revealed common elements across the selected studies that will be useful in guiding creation of targeted supports for PCPs to manage CNCP. This review also yielded insights for pain clinicians at tertiary centers for supporting their PCP colleagues as well as systemic reforms required to support patients with CNCP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Understanding Needs for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Management in a Northern Dene and Métis Community: A Community Based Needs Assessment. Prospective Preference Assessment for the Psilocybin for Enhanced Analgesia in Chronic nEuropathic PAIN (PEACE-PAIN) Trial. Assessing Quality of Referrals to a Community-Based Chronic Pain Clinic. The Influence of Loneliness on Pain Outcomes for Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Chronic pain experiences of immigrant Indian women in Canada: A photovoice exploration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1