如何让不愿出院的病人出院?保持AMA

G. Magro , L. Mumoli , E. Le Piane , A. Clodomiro , D. Pirritano , D. Bosco
{"title":"如何让不愿出院的病人出院?保持AMA","authors":"G. Magro ,&nbsp;L. Mumoli ,&nbsp;E. Le Piane ,&nbsp;A. Clodomiro ,&nbsp;D. Pirritano ,&nbsp;D. Bosco","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2023.100955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many physicians are familiar with patients who leave against medical advice, much less known is the refusal to leave the hospital. Here we report a case, that we encountered during the Covid pandemic, of a patient who was convinced of having Cauda-Equina syndrome and refused to leave the hospital until the MRI was done. Taking inspiration from this case, we decided to offer a practical approach to dealing with situations like these, to avoid discharge to the street and discuss the ethical implications of similar situations, like the one we encountered. Proactive psychiatric consultation services were demonstrated to reduce the length of stay. Based on these considerations we also suggest early psychiatric consultation to assist medical teams in identifying possible barriers to discharge and help with the management of these difficult cases. Hospitals should also develop internal protocols to deal with difficult discharges. Well-defined protocols could help to deal with emotional states such as bursts of outrage and allegations of abandonment by the patients, like the ones we recently encountered. Nonetheless, we believe a shared discharge decision between patients and physicians should be the common goal. This problem is often encountered in clinical practice but literature on the matter is scarce, since staying against medical advice (SAMA) is far less common than its sibling: leaving against medical advice (LAMA).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100955"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to discharge a patient who does not want to be discharged? Staying AMA\",\"authors\":\"G. Magro ,&nbsp;L. Mumoli ,&nbsp;E. Le Piane ,&nbsp;A. Clodomiro ,&nbsp;D. Pirritano ,&nbsp;D. Bosco\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemep.2023.100955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Many physicians are familiar with patients who leave against medical advice, much less known is the refusal to leave the hospital. Here we report a case, that we encountered during the Covid pandemic, of a patient who was convinced of having Cauda-Equina syndrome and refused to leave the hospital until the MRI was done. Taking inspiration from this case, we decided to offer a practical approach to dealing with situations like these, to avoid discharge to the street and discuss the ethical implications of similar situations, like the one we encountered. Proactive psychiatric consultation services were demonstrated to reduce the length of stay. Based on these considerations we also suggest early psychiatric consultation to assist medical teams in identifying possible barriers to discharge and help with the management of these difficult cases. Hospitals should also develop internal protocols to deal with difficult discharges. Well-defined protocols could help to deal with emotional states such as bursts of outrage and allegations of abandonment by the patients, like the ones we recently encountered. Nonetheless, we believe a shared discharge decision between patients and physicians should be the common goal. This problem is often encountered in clinical practice but literature on the matter is scarce, since staying against medical advice (SAMA) is far less common than its sibling: leaving against medical advice (LAMA).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100955\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552523000865\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552523000865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多医生都熟悉那些不听医嘱而离开医院的病人,但很少有人知道拒绝离开医院。在这里,我们报告了一个病例,我们在Covid大流行期间遇到了一个病人,他确信自己患有马尾综合征,拒绝离开医院,直到核磁共振成像完成。从这个案例中获得灵感,我们决定提供一种实用的方法来处理类似的情况,以避免被扔到街上,并讨论类似情况的道德含义,就像我们遇到的那样。积极主动的精神病学咨询服务被证明可以缩短住院时间。基于这些考虑,我们还建议尽早进行精神病学咨询,以帮助医疗团队确定可能的出院障碍,并帮助管理这些困难的病例。医院还应制定内部规程,以处理难以出院的病人。明确的协议可以帮助处理情绪状态,比如愤怒的爆发和被病人抛弃的指控,就像我们最近遇到的那样。尽管如此,我们认为患者和医生之间共同的出院决定应该是共同的目标。这个问题在临床实践中经常遇到,但关于这个问题的文献很少,因为不遵医嘱留下来(SAMA)远比不遵医嘱离开(LAMA)少见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How to discharge a patient who does not want to be discharged? Staying AMA

Many physicians are familiar with patients who leave against medical advice, much less known is the refusal to leave the hospital. Here we report a case, that we encountered during the Covid pandemic, of a patient who was convinced of having Cauda-Equina syndrome and refused to leave the hospital until the MRI was done. Taking inspiration from this case, we decided to offer a practical approach to dealing with situations like these, to avoid discharge to the street and discuss the ethical implications of similar situations, like the one we encountered. Proactive psychiatric consultation services were demonstrated to reduce the length of stay. Based on these considerations we also suggest early psychiatric consultation to assist medical teams in identifying possible barriers to discharge and help with the management of these difficult cases. Hospitals should also develop internal protocols to deal with difficult discharges. Well-defined protocols could help to deal with emotional states such as bursts of outrage and allegations of abandonment by the patients, like the ones we recently encountered. Nonetheless, we believe a shared discharge decision between patients and physicians should be the common goal. This problem is often encountered in clinical practice but literature on the matter is scarce, since staying against medical advice (SAMA) is far less common than its sibling: leaving against medical advice (LAMA).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
期刊最新文献
No reward without responsibility: Focus on peer review reports The human body and the body elements—Conditions for their use in genetics under the French bioethics law and beyond A retrospective cohort study on lung cancer screening methods in Japan and the US The Kussmaul sign in Michelangelo Buonarroti (1475–1564) Ethical reflections on healthy aging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1