{"title":"抗组胺药苯海拉明和特非那定对中枢神经系统的影响(RMI 9918)。","authors":"M Fink, P Irwin","doi":"10.1055/s-0028-1094592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The quantitative EEG profile of a putative antihistaminic drug, terfenadine, was determined in a crossover comparison with diphenhydramine in normal male volunteers. Terfenadine failed to elicit the characteristic EEG or behavioral effects of sedative antihistaminics, and was distinguishable from diphenhydramine. The EEG profile confirmed the lack of CNS effect observed in preclinical and clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":76325,"journal":{"name":"Pharmakopsychiatrie, Neuro-Psychopharmakologie","volume":"12 1","pages":"35-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0028-1094592","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CNS effects of the antihistamines diphenhydramine and terfenadine (RMI 9918).\",\"authors\":\"M Fink, P Irwin\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0028-1094592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The quantitative EEG profile of a putative antihistaminic drug, terfenadine, was determined in a crossover comparison with diphenhydramine in normal male volunteers. Terfenadine failed to elicit the characteristic EEG or behavioral effects of sedative antihistaminics, and was distinguishable from diphenhydramine. The EEG profile confirmed the lack of CNS effect observed in preclinical and clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmakopsychiatrie, Neuro-Psychopharmakologie\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"35-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1979-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0028-1094592\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmakopsychiatrie, Neuro-Psychopharmakologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1094592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmakopsychiatrie, Neuro-Psychopharmakologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1094592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
CNS effects of the antihistamines diphenhydramine and terfenadine (RMI 9918).
The quantitative EEG profile of a putative antihistaminic drug, terfenadine, was determined in a crossover comparison with diphenhydramine in normal male volunteers. Terfenadine failed to elicit the characteristic EEG or behavioral effects of sedative antihistaminics, and was distinguishable from diphenhydramine. The EEG profile confirmed the lack of CNS effect observed in preclinical and clinical trials.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
