吸吸细胞学在头颈部肿块诊断中的应用。

D S Meyers, J Templer, W E Davis, J A Balch
{"title":"吸吸细胞学在头颈部肿块诊断中的应用。","authors":"D S Meyers,&nbsp;J Templer,&nbsp;W E Davis,&nbsp;J A Balch","doi":"10.1177/01945998780860s421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most American clinicans have been relectant to utilize aspiration biopsy due to poor interpretive skills by the pathologists in the past and a fear of tumor spread by the needle. Voluminous European series and recent American series have proved aspiration to be safe and reliable. In our series of 78 cases, both thin-needle aspiration and conventional tissue biopsies were made. The diagnoses were compared and the overall agreement rate was 90%.</p>","PeriodicalId":76297,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology","volume":"86 4 Pt 1","pages":"ORL-650-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01945998780860s421","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aspiration cytology for diagnosis of head and neck masses.\",\"authors\":\"D S Meyers,&nbsp;J Templer,&nbsp;W E Davis,&nbsp;J A Balch\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01945998780860s421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Most American clinicans have been relectant to utilize aspiration biopsy due to poor interpretive skills by the pathologists in the past and a fear of tumor spread by the needle. Voluminous European series and recent American series have proved aspiration to be safe and reliable. In our series of 78 cases, both thin-needle aspiration and conventional tissue biopsies were made. The diagnoses were compared and the overall agreement rate was 90%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"86 4 Pt 1\",\"pages\":\"ORL-650-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01945998780860s421\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01945998780860s421\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01945998780860s421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

由于过去病理学家的解释能力较差,以及担心肿瘤通过针头扩散,大多数美国临床医生不愿采用穿刺活检。大量的欧洲系列产品和最近的美国系列产品已被证明是安全可靠的。在我们的78例病例中,同时进行了细针穿刺和常规组织活检。对诊断结果进行比较,总体符合率为90%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aspiration cytology for diagnosis of head and neck masses.

Most American clinicans have been relectant to utilize aspiration biopsy due to poor interpretive skills by the pathologists in the past and a fear of tumor spread by the needle. Voluminous European series and recent American series have proved aspiration to be safe and reliable. In our series of 78 cases, both thin-needle aspiration and conventional tissue biopsies were made. The diagnoses were compared and the overall agreement rate was 90%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A randomized combination chemotherapy trial, with and without adriamycin, in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Blunt laryngotracheal trauma. Rhytidectomy (face-lift) in the otolaryngologic practice. Endolymphatic-subarachnoid shunt tube: a new design. Air-caloric delivery tube adapter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1