{"title":"吸吸细胞学在头颈部肿块诊断中的应用。","authors":"D S Meyers, J Templer, W E Davis, J A Balch","doi":"10.1177/01945998780860s421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most American clinicans have been relectant to utilize aspiration biopsy due to poor interpretive skills by the pathologists in the past and a fear of tumor spread by the needle. Voluminous European series and recent American series have proved aspiration to be safe and reliable. In our series of 78 cases, both thin-needle aspiration and conventional tissue biopsies were made. The diagnoses were compared and the overall agreement rate was 90%.</p>","PeriodicalId":76297,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology","volume":"86 4 Pt 1","pages":"ORL-650-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01945998780860s421","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aspiration cytology for diagnosis of head and neck masses.\",\"authors\":\"D S Meyers, J Templer, W E Davis, J A Balch\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01945998780860s421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Most American clinicans have been relectant to utilize aspiration biopsy due to poor interpretive skills by the pathologists in the past and a fear of tumor spread by the needle. Voluminous European series and recent American series have proved aspiration to be safe and reliable. In our series of 78 cases, both thin-needle aspiration and conventional tissue biopsies were made. The diagnoses were compared and the overall agreement rate was 90%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"86 4 Pt 1\",\"pages\":\"ORL-650-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01945998780860s421\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01945998780860s421\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01945998780860s421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Aspiration cytology for diagnosis of head and neck masses.
Most American clinicans have been relectant to utilize aspiration biopsy due to poor interpretive skills by the pathologists in the past and a fear of tumor spread by the needle. Voluminous European series and recent American series have proved aspiration to be safe and reliable. In our series of 78 cases, both thin-needle aspiration and conventional tissue biopsies were made. The diagnoses were compared and the overall agreement rate was 90%.