{"title":"小窗镫骨切除术1例。","authors":"G D Smyth","doi":"10.1177/019459987808600321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eight hundred stapedectomies were analyzed to evaluate the long-term results with four prostheses. It was concluded that limitation of fenestra size played a most important part in the outcome of stapedectomy, especially in regard to the preservation of high-frequency bone conduction response over prolonged periods. Other advantages deriving from small fenestra stapedectomy included significantly fewer fistulae and severe sensorineural losses.</p>","PeriodicalId":76297,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology","volume":"86 3 Pt 1","pages":"ORL488-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/019459987808600321","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The case for small fenestra stapedectomy.\",\"authors\":\"G D Smyth\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/019459987808600321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Eight hundred stapedectomies were analyzed to evaluate the long-term results with four prostheses. It was concluded that limitation of fenestra size played a most important part in the outcome of stapedectomy, especially in regard to the preservation of high-frequency bone conduction response over prolonged periods. Other advantages deriving from small fenestra stapedectomy included significantly fewer fistulae and severe sensorineural losses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"86 3 Pt 1\",\"pages\":\"ORL488-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/019459987808600321\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/019459987808600321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/019459987808600321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Eight hundred stapedectomies were analyzed to evaluate the long-term results with four prostheses. It was concluded that limitation of fenestra size played a most important part in the outcome of stapedectomy, especially in regard to the preservation of high-frequency bone conduction response over prolonged periods. Other advantages deriving from small fenestra stapedectomy included significantly fewer fistulae and severe sensorineural losses.