{"title":"致癌物诱导的核苷酸可渗透大肠杆菌细胞的DNA修复。致癌性k区环氧化合物和1,2,3,4-二聚丁烷诱导的DNA修复分析。","authors":"H W Thielmann, H Gersbach","doi":"10.1007/BF00312408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ether-permeabilized (nucleotide-permeable) Escherichia coli cells exhibited DNA excision repair when exposed to the following carcinogenic K-region epoxides: 7-methyl- and 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene-5,6-oxide, chrysene-5,6-oxide and benzo[a]pyrene-4,5-oxide. This DNA excision repair was missing in uvr A and uvr B mutant cells. The K-region epoxide phenanthrene-9,10-oxide was ineffective in all E. coli strains tested. In contrast to the K-region epoxides which where found active only in wild type cells, 1,2,3,4-diepoxybutane and the 6,7-epoxides of the tumor promoter TPA (12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate) elicited DNA repair in uvrA, uvrB mutant cells as well. Enzymic activities catalyzing particular repair steps were identified by determining a) repair polymerization and b) size reduction of denatured DNA. A) An easily quantifiable effect in E. coli wild type cells was epoxide-induced repair polymerization. None of the K-region epoxides tested stimulated DNA repair synthesis in uvrA, uvrB mutant cells, indicating that the uvrA-, uvrB-controlled UV-endonuclease initiated excision repair by cleaving epoxide-damaged DNA. 1,2,3,4-Diepoxybutane and the TPA-6,7-oxides induced DNA repair polymerization in uvr-deficient cells, although to a lesser extent than in wild type cells, suggesting the involvement of uvr-independent incision steps. None of the epoxides induced repair polymerization in a mutant (polA107) lacking the 5'--3'exonucleolytic activity of DNA polymerase I (exonuclease VI). The absence of any repair polymerization in the polA107 mutant indicates that the exonuclease VI plays a central role in removing epoxide-damaged nucleotides. As evidenced by greatly reduced levels of repair polymerization measured in polA1 cells, DNA polymerase I was the main polymerizing enzyme. b) As a consequence of treatment with 7-methyl-benz[a]anthracene-5,6-oxide, DNA from wild type cells, contrary to uvrA mutant cells, showed size reduction after denaturation and sedimentation in alkaline sucrose gradients. This is explained by repair-specific endonucleolytic cleavage of damaged DNA. The incision required the presence of ATP indicating that functional UV-endonuclease needs ATP as a cofactor.</p>","PeriodicalId":76850,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Krebsforschung und klinische Onkologie. Cancer research and clinical oncology","volume":"92 2","pages":"157-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF00312408","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carcinogen-induced DNA repair in nucleotide-permeable Escherichia coli cells. Analysis of DNA repair induced by carcinogenic K-region epoxides and 1,2,3,4-diepoxybutane.\",\"authors\":\"H W Thielmann, H Gersbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF00312408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ether-permeabilized (nucleotide-permeable) Escherichia coli cells exhibited DNA excision repair when exposed to the following carcinogenic K-region epoxides: 7-methyl- and 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene-5,6-oxide, chrysene-5,6-oxide and benzo[a]pyrene-4,5-oxide. This DNA excision repair was missing in uvr A and uvr B mutant cells. The K-region epoxide phenanthrene-9,10-oxide was ineffective in all E. coli strains tested. In contrast to the K-region epoxides which where found active only in wild type cells, 1,2,3,4-diepoxybutane and the 6,7-epoxides of the tumor promoter TPA (12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate) elicited DNA repair in uvrA, uvrB mutant cells as well. Enzymic activities catalyzing particular repair steps were identified by determining a) repair polymerization and b) size reduction of denatured DNA. A) An easily quantifiable effect in E. coli wild type cells was epoxide-induced repair polymerization. None of the K-region epoxides tested stimulated DNA repair synthesis in uvrA, uvrB mutant cells, indicating that the uvrA-, uvrB-controlled UV-endonuclease initiated excision repair by cleaving epoxide-damaged DNA. 1,2,3,4-Diepoxybutane and the TPA-6,7-oxides induced DNA repair polymerization in uvr-deficient cells, although to a lesser extent than in wild type cells, suggesting the involvement of uvr-independent incision steps. None of the epoxides induced repair polymerization in a mutant (polA107) lacking the 5'--3'exonucleolytic activity of DNA polymerase I (exonuclease VI). The absence of any repair polymerization in the polA107 mutant indicates that the exonuclease VI plays a central role in removing epoxide-damaged nucleotides. As evidenced by greatly reduced levels of repair polymerization measured in polA1 cells, DNA polymerase I was the main polymerizing enzyme. b) As a consequence of treatment with 7-methyl-benz[a]anthracene-5,6-oxide, DNA from wild type cells, contrary to uvrA mutant cells, showed size reduction after denaturation and sedimentation in alkaline sucrose gradients. This is explained by repair-specific endonucleolytic cleavage of damaged DNA. The incision required the presence of ATP indicating that functional UV-endonuclease needs ATP as a cofactor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Krebsforschung und klinische Onkologie. Cancer research and clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\"92 2\",\"pages\":\"157-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF00312408\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Krebsforschung und klinische Onkologie. Cancer research and clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Krebsforschung und klinische Onkologie. Cancer research and clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
当暴露于以下致癌性k区环氧化合物:7-甲基-和7,12-二甲基-苯[a]蒽-5,6-氧化物,蒽-5,6-氧化物和苯并[a]芘-4,5-氧化物时,醚渗透(核苷酸渗透)大肠杆菌细胞表现出DNA切除修复。这种DNA切除修复在uvr A和uvr B突变细胞中缺失。k区环氧化合物菲-9,10-氧化物对所有大肠杆菌菌株无效。与仅在野生型细胞中发现的k区环氧化物不同,肿瘤启动子TPA (12- o -十四烷-磷酸-13-乙酸酯)的1,2,3,4-二氧基丁烷和6,7-环氧化物也能在uvrA、uvrB突变细胞中引起DNA修复。通过测定a)修复聚合和b)变性DNA的尺寸减小来鉴定催化特定修复步骤的酶活性。A)在大肠杆菌野生型细胞中,一个容易量化的效应是环氧化物诱导的修复聚合。在uvrA和uvrB突变细胞中,k区环氧化物均未刺激DNA修复合成,这表明uvrA-和uvrB控制的uv内切酶通过切割环氧化物损伤的DNA来启动切除修复。1,2,3,4-二氧基丁烷和tpa -6,7-氧化物在紫外线缺乏细胞中诱导DNA修复聚合,尽管其程度低于野生型细胞,这表明与紫外线无关的切口步骤有关。在缺乏DNA聚合酶I(外切酶VI) 5′—3′外切活性的突变体(polA107)中,没有任何环氧化物诱导修复聚合。polA107突变体中没有任何修复聚合表明外切酶VI在去除环氧化物损伤的核苷酸中起核心作用。polA1细胞的修复聚合水平大大降低,证明DNA聚合酶I是主要的聚合酶。b) 7-甲基-苯[a]蒽-5,6-氧化物处理的结果是,与uvrA突变细胞相反,野生型细胞的DNA在变性和碱性蔗糖梯度沉降后显示尺寸减小。这是由受损DNA的修复特异性核内溶分裂来解释的。切口需要ATP的存在,表明功能性uv -核酸内切酶需要ATP作为辅助因子。
Carcinogen-induced DNA repair in nucleotide-permeable Escherichia coli cells. Analysis of DNA repair induced by carcinogenic K-region epoxides and 1,2,3,4-diepoxybutane.
Ether-permeabilized (nucleotide-permeable) Escherichia coli cells exhibited DNA excision repair when exposed to the following carcinogenic K-region epoxides: 7-methyl- and 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene-5,6-oxide, chrysene-5,6-oxide and benzo[a]pyrene-4,5-oxide. This DNA excision repair was missing in uvr A and uvr B mutant cells. The K-region epoxide phenanthrene-9,10-oxide was ineffective in all E. coli strains tested. In contrast to the K-region epoxides which where found active only in wild type cells, 1,2,3,4-diepoxybutane and the 6,7-epoxides of the tumor promoter TPA (12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate) elicited DNA repair in uvrA, uvrB mutant cells as well. Enzymic activities catalyzing particular repair steps were identified by determining a) repair polymerization and b) size reduction of denatured DNA. A) An easily quantifiable effect in E. coli wild type cells was epoxide-induced repair polymerization. None of the K-region epoxides tested stimulated DNA repair synthesis in uvrA, uvrB mutant cells, indicating that the uvrA-, uvrB-controlled UV-endonuclease initiated excision repair by cleaving epoxide-damaged DNA. 1,2,3,4-Diepoxybutane and the TPA-6,7-oxides induced DNA repair polymerization in uvr-deficient cells, although to a lesser extent than in wild type cells, suggesting the involvement of uvr-independent incision steps. None of the epoxides induced repair polymerization in a mutant (polA107) lacking the 5'--3'exonucleolytic activity of DNA polymerase I (exonuclease VI). The absence of any repair polymerization in the polA107 mutant indicates that the exonuclease VI plays a central role in removing epoxide-damaged nucleotides. As evidenced by greatly reduced levels of repair polymerization measured in polA1 cells, DNA polymerase I was the main polymerizing enzyme. b) As a consequence of treatment with 7-methyl-benz[a]anthracene-5,6-oxide, DNA from wild type cells, contrary to uvrA mutant cells, showed size reduction after denaturation and sedimentation in alkaline sucrose gradients. This is explained by repair-specific endonucleolytic cleavage of damaged DNA. The incision required the presence of ATP indicating that functional UV-endonuclease needs ATP as a cofactor.