{"title":"Schelerowska kategoria resentymentu w świetle sporów o sekularyzację Zachodu","authors":"W. Banach","doi":"10.14746/cis.2022.54.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \nThe aim of the article is to verify the category of ressentiment developed by Max Scheler in the light of disputes about the sources and causes of secularization. The category of ressentiment is one of the most important subjects of the author’s scientific reflection, being an expression of his particular interest in the functioning of the world of values. On the other hand, the processes of secularization, which have become visible in Western societies in recent decades, are understood here as the result of a decline in interest in religious issues and the disappearance of references to the broadly understood supernatural world. The key issues concern the extent to which the phenomenological conceptual apparatus developed by Scheler can serve today as an effective tool for a fuller understanding of the essence of contemporary disputes over the secularization of the West. Thus, it seems possible to assess the topicality of Scheler’s approach to the world of values as a timeless model and point of reference in research on the changing social reality. \n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":444061,"journal":{"name":"Człowiek i Społeczeństwo","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Człowiek i Społeczeństwo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/cis.2022.54.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是根据关于世俗化的来源和原因的争论来验证马克斯·舍勒所提出的怨恨的范畴。怨恨的范畴是作者科学反思中最重要的主题之一,表达了他对价值世界运作的特殊兴趣。另一方面,近几十年来在西方社会可见的世俗化进程,在这里被理解为对宗教问题兴趣下降和对广泛理解的超自然世界的参考消失的结果。关键问题是,舍勒发展的现象学概念工具在多大程度上可以作为一种有效的工具,用于更全面地理解当代关于西方世俗化争论的本质。因此,似乎有可能评估舍勒的方法的话题性的价值世界作为一个永恒的模型和参考点的研究不断变化的社会现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Schelerowska kategoria resentymentu w świetle sporów o sekularyzację Zachodu
The aim of the article is to verify the category of ressentiment developed by Max Scheler in the light of disputes about the sources and causes of secularization. The category of ressentiment is one of the most important subjects of the author’s scientific reflection, being an expression of his particular interest in the functioning of the world of values. On the other hand, the processes of secularization, which have become visible in Western societies in recent decades, are understood here as the result of a decline in interest in religious issues and the disappearance of references to the broadly understood supernatural world. The key issues concern the extent to which the phenomenological conceptual apparatus developed by Scheler can serve today as an effective tool for a fuller understanding of the essence of contemporary disputes over the secularization of the West. Thus, it seems possible to assess the topicality of Scheler’s approach to the world of values as a timeless model and point of reference in research on the changing social reality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Wprowadzenie redaktorów tomu. Inspiracja i zaproszenie do dyskusji o socjologii miasta Tożsamość społeczno-przestrzenna miasta satelitarnego. Przykład Lubonia koło Poznania Psychologiczne uwarunkowania przywiązania do miejsca: zaufanie społeczne, styl przywiązania i lęk. Badanie longitudinalne w okresie pandemii COVID-19 Uważność a radzenie sobie ze stresem u kobiet i mężczyzn Kapitał społeczny miasta globalizującego się. Studium przypadku Krakowa i Poznania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1