生产零件批准过程的风险评估方法

M. Lafayette, Z. Li, S. Webster
{"title":"生产零件批准过程的风险评估方法","authors":"M. Lafayette, Z. Li, S. Webster","doi":"10.1109/RAM.2017.7889728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Production part approval process (PPAP) is originally designed and used in the automotive industry to assure supplier parts integrity and manufacturing processes maturity. As an effective risk reduction process prior to product/service release, PPAP has been widely used in many other industries including aerospace industry. In this research, the existing method of assessing part risks for PPAP implementation within the United Technology Corporation (UTC) is investigated. Risk assessment has been based on seven risk categories of a part and a multiplicative risk calculation algorithm is used to determine if a PPAP is needed or not. A refined risk assessment algorithm based on logistic regression is proposed using the seven risk categories which include both quantitative and qualitative risk measurements. The logistic regression risk assessment model is trained and tested using past program PPAP data sets. The advantages of the proposed risk assessment method are illustrated through economic analyses of the two PPAP risk methods under the cost estimates of the PPAP standard and elements being practiced at UTC.","PeriodicalId":138871,"journal":{"name":"2017 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","volume":"56 50","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A risk assessment method for production part approval process\",\"authors\":\"M. Lafayette, Z. Li, S. Webster\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAM.2017.7889728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Production part approval process (PPAP) is originally designed and used in the automotive industry to assure supplier parts integrity and manufacturing processes maturity. As an effective risk reduction process prior to product/service release, PPAP has been widely used in many other industries including aerospace industry. In this research, the existing method of assessing part risks for PPAP implementation within the United Technology Corporation (UTC) is investigated. Risk assessment has been based on seven risk categories of a part and a multiplicative risk calculation algorithm is used to determine if a PPAP is needed or not. A refined risk assessment algorithm based on logistic regression is proposed using the seven risk categories which include both quantitative and qualitative risk measurements. The logistic regression risk assessment model is trained and tested using past program PPAP data sets. The advantages of the proposed risk assessment method are illustrated through economic analyses of the two PPAP risk methods under the cost estimates of the PPAP standard and elements being practiced at UTC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)\",\"volume\":\"56 50\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAM.2017.7889728\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAM.2017.7889728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生产零件批准程序(PPAP)最初是在汽车工业中设计和使用的,以确保供应商零件的完整性和制造过程的成熟度。PPAP作为产品/服务发布前的一种有效的风险降低过程,已广泛应用于包括航空航天工业在内的许多其他行业。在本研究中,对联合技术公司(UTC)实施PPAP的现有部件风险评估方法进行了研究。风险评估基于零件的七个风险类别,并使用乘法风险计算算法来确定是否需要PPAP。在此基础上,提出了一种基于logistic回归的风险评估算法。逻辑回归风险评估模型使用过去的项目PPAP数据集进行训练和测试。通过对两种PPAP风险方法在PPAP标准成本估算和UTC正在实施的要素下的经济分析,说明了所提出的风险评估方法的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A risk assessment method for production part approval process
Production part approval process (PPAP) is originally designed and used in the automotive industry to assure supplier parts integrity and manufacturing processes maturity. As an effective risk reduction process prior to product/service release, PPAP has been widely used in many other industries including aerospace industry. In this research, the existing method of assessing part risks for PPAP implementation within the United Technology Corporation (UTC) is investigated. Risk assessment has been based on seven risk categories of a part and a multiplicative risk calculation algorithm is used to determine if a PPAP is needed or not. A refined risk assessment algorithm based on logistic regression is proposed using the seven risk categories which include both quantitative and qualitative risk measurements. The logistic regression risk assessment model is trained and tested using past program PPAP data sets. The advantages of the proposed risk assessment method are illustrated through economic analyses of the two PPAP risk methods under the cost estimates of the PPAP standard and elements being practiced at UTC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reliability study on high-k bi-layer dielectrics Contracting for system availability under fleet expansion: Redundancy allocation or spares inventory? Risk modeling of variable probability external initiating events Human reliability assessments: Using the past (Shuttle) to predict the future (Orion) Uniform analysis of fault trees through model transformations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1