比较Adam和SGD优化器来训练AlexNet分类古建筑的GPR c扫描

M. Manataki, A. Vafidis, Apostolos Sarris
{"title":"比较Adam和SGD优化器来训练AlexNet分类古建筑的GPR c扫描","authors":"M. Manataki, A. Vafidis, Apostolos Sarris","doi":"10.1109/iwagpr50767.2021.9843162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, AlexNet architecture is implemented and trained to classify C-scans featuring ancient structural patterns. The performance of two popular optimizers is examined and compared, namely the Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) with momentum and Adaptive Moments Estimate (Adam). The two optimizers were employed to train models using a GPR dataset from several archaeological sites. The results showed that even though SGD was more challenging to achieve learning, it eventually performed better than Adam when Batch Normalization, Dropout, and tuning the batch size and learning rate were performed. Furthermore, the generalization was tested using entirely independent data. SGD performed better, scoring 95% over 90% classification accuracy. The obtained results highlight how important the optimizer’s choice can be in the learning process and is worth investigating when training CNNs models with GPR data.","PeriodicalId":170169,"journal":{"name":"2021 11th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR)","volume":"4 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Adam and SGD optimizers to train AlexNet for classifying GPR C-scans featuring ancient structures\",\"authors\":\"M. Manataki, A. Vafidis, Apostolos Sarris\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/iwagpr50767.2021.9843162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, AlexNet architecture is implemented and trained to classify C-scans featuring ancient structural patterns. The performance of two popular optimizers is examined and compared, namely the Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) with momentum and Adaptive Moments Estimate (Adam). The two optimizers were employed to train models using a GPR dataset from several archaeological sites. The results showed that even though SGD was more challenging to achieve learning, it eventually performed better than Adam when Batch Normalization, Dropout, and tuning the batch size and learning rate were performed. Furthermore, the generalization was tested using entirely independent data. SGD performed better, scoring 95% over 90% classification accuracy. The obtained results highlight how important the optimizer’s choice can be in the learning process and is worth investigating when training CNNs models with GPR data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 11th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR)\",\"volume\":\"4 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 11th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/iwagpr50767.2021.9843162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 11th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iwagpr50767.2021.9843162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在本研究中,AlexNet架构被实现并训练用于分类具有古代结构模式的c扫描。比较了两种常用的优化算法的性能,即带动量的随机梯度下降算法(SGD)和自适应矩估计算法(Adam)。利用几个考古遗址的GPR数据集,使用这两个优化器来训练模型。结果表明,尽管SGD在实现学习方面更具挑战性,但在执行批处理归一化、Dropout和调优批处理大小和学习率时,它最终比Adam表现得更好。此外,使用完全独立的数据对泛化进行了检验。SGD表现更好,分类准确率达到95%以上。所得结果突出了优化器的选择在学习过程中的重要性,值得在使用GPR数据训练cnn模型时进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing Adam and SGD optimizers to train AlexNet for classifying GPR C-scans featuring ancient structures
In this study, AlexNet architecture is implemented and trained to classify C-scans featuring ancient structural patterns. The performance of two popular optimizers is examined and compared, namely the Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) with momentum and Adaptive Moments Estimate (Adam). The two optimizers were employed to train models using a GPR dataset from several archaeological sites. The results showed that even though SGD was more challenging to achieve learning, it eventually performed better than Adam when Batch Normalization, Dropout, and tuning the batch size and learning rate were performed. Furthermore, the generalization was tested using entirely independent data. SGD performed better, scoring 95% over 90% classification accuracy. The obtained results highlight how important the optimizer’s choice can be in the learning process and is worth investigating when training CNNs models with GPR data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing Adam and SGD optimizers to train AlexNet for classifying GPR C-scans featuring ancient structures Polarimetric Alpha Angle versus Relative Permittivity with Dual-Polarimetric GPR Experiments GPR Monitoring at the Crypt of Sant’Agnese in Agone Church, Rome, Italy Evaluation of the possibility of using the radio frequency range for the survey of the Great Pyramid Full Waveform Inversion of common offset GPR data using a fast deep learning based forward solver
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1