{"title":"第二次会议","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/S0068673500010348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(1) The objection that a verb cannot be borrowed at all \" except under special (e. g. political) conditions \" was unfounded, as also (2) were the objections that a verb cannot be transferred \"in a particular tense, and that tense only, from one language to another,\" and that a verb cannot \"be 'borrowed' with its tensetermination affixed.\" (3) The third a of avao-axcT was manifestly due to wrongly assumed connexion with Osc. sakrim 'sacrum' sakahi ter ' sanciatur' aaxopo ' sacrum' etc. Parallels hereto were cited in support of this view. (4) Doubt was thrown on the alleged use of the symbol ^ to represent Osc. f; and further, granting for sake of argument that Fensernum had invented a symbol i =f, it was shewn that even so the S of avaScucer and Stories could not be this symbol i.","PeriodicalId":177773,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Second Meeting\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0068673500010348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"(1) The objection that a verb cannot be borrowed at all \\\" except under special (e. g. political) conditions \\\" was unfounded, as also (2) were the objections that a verb cannot be transferred \\\"in a particular tense, and that tense only, from one language to another,\\\" and that a verb cannot \\\"be 'borrowed' with its tensetermination affixed.\\\" (3) The third a of avao-axcT was manifestly due to wrongly assumed connexion with Osc. sakrim 'sacrum' sakahi ter ' sanciatur' aaxopo ' sacrum' etc. Parallels hereto were cited in support of this view. (4) Doubt was thrown on the alleged use of the symbol ^ to represent Osc. f; and further, granting for sake of argument that Fensernum had invented a symbol i =f, it was shewn that even so the S of avaScucer and Stories could not be this symbol i.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068673500010348\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068673500010348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
(1) The objection that a verb cannot be borrowed at all " except under special (e. g. political) conditions " was unfounded, as also (2) were the objections that a verb cannot be transferred "in a particular tense, and that tense only, from one language to another," and that a verb cannot "be 'borrowed' with its tensetermination affixed." (3) The third a of avao-axcT was manifestly due to wrongly assumed connexion with Osc. sakrim 'sacrum' sakahi ter ' sanciatur' aaxopo ' sacrum' etc. Parallels hereto were cited in support of this view. (4) Doubt was thrown on the alleged use of the symbol ^ to represent Osc. f; and further, granting for sake of argument that Fensernum had invented a symbol i =f, it was shewn that even so the S of avaScucer and Stories could not be this symbol i.