比较和评估兴趣点

C. Schmid, R. Mohr, C. Bauckhage
{"title":"比较和评估兴趣点","authors":"C. Schmid, R. Mohr, C. Bauckhage","doi":"10.1109/ICCV.1998.710723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many computer vision tasks rely on feature extraction. Interest points are such features. This paper shows that interest points are geometrically stable under different transformations and have high information content (distinctiveness). These two properties make interest points very successful in the contest of image matching. To measure these two properties quantitatively, we introduce two evaluation criteria: repeatability rate and information content. The quality of the interest points depends on the detector used. In this paper several detectors are compared according to the criteria specified above. We determine which detector gives the best results and show that it satisfies the criteria well.","PeriodicalId":270671,"journal":{"name":"Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271)","volume":"912 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"358","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing and evaluating interest points\",\"authors\":\"C. Schmid, R. Mohr, C. Bauckhage\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCV.1998.710723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many computer vision tasks rely on feature extraction. Interest points are such features. This paper shows that interest points are geometrically stable under different transformations and have high information content (distinctiveness). These two properties make interest points very successful in the contest of image matching. To measure these two properties quantitatively, we introduce two evaluation criteria: repeatability rate and information content. The quality of the interest points depends on the detector used. In this paper several detectors are compared according to the criteria specified above. We determine which detector gives the best results and show that it satisfies the criteria well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271)\",\"volume\":\"912 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"358\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.1998.710723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.1998.710723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 358

摘要

许多计算机视觉任务依赖于特征提取。兴趣点就是这样的特征。研究表明,兴趣点在不同变换条件下几何稳定,具有较高的信息含量(显著性)。这两个特性使得兴趣点在图像匹配的竞争中非常成功。为了定量地衡量这两个属性,我们引入了两个评价标准:重复性率和信息含量。兴趣点的质量取决于所使用的检测器。本文根据上述准则对几种检测器进行了比较。我们确定了哪个检测器给出了最好的结果,并表明它很好地满足了标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing and evaluating interest points
Many computer vision tasks rely on feature extraction. Interest points are such features. This paper shows that interest points are geometrically stable under different transformations and have high information content (distinctiveness). These two properties make interest points very successful in the contest of image matching. To measure these two properties quantitatively, we introduce two evaluation criteria: repeatability rate and information content. The quality of the interest points depends on the detector used. In this paper several detectors are compared according to the criteria specified above. We determine which detector gives the best results and show that it satisfies the criteria well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing and evaluating interest points Snake pedals: geometric models with physics-based control Recovering epipolar geometry by reactive tabu search Utilization of stereo disparity and optical flow information for human interaction Intensity and feature based stereo matching by disparity parameterization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1