没有成本优势的外包

Chrysovalantou Milliou
{"title":"没有成本优势的外包","authors":"Chrysovalantou Milliou","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3693726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the incentives of competing firms to outsource to a common supplier and shows that firms outsource even when the supplier does not have a cost advantage in input production. The suppliers contract offers generate cost asymmetry, alter product market competition, and improve the competitive position of one of its customers. The use of nonlinear contracts is crucial for the emergence of outsourcing. The supplier purposefully avoids industry profit maximization to enlarge its profits share. Both consumers and welfare benefit from the presence of an otherwise redundant supplier in the market.","PeriodicalId":416291,"journal":{"name":"IO: Firm Structure","volume":"303 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outsourcing without Cost Advantages\",\"authors\":\"Chrysovalantou Milliou\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3693726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores the incentives of competing firms to outsource to a common supplier and shows that firms outsource even when the supplier does not have a cost advantage in input production. The suppliers contract offers generate cost asymmetry, alter product market competition, and improve the competitive position of one of its customers. The use of nonlinear contracts is crucial for the emergence of outsourcing. The supplier purposefully avoids industry profit maximization to enlarge its profits share. Both consumers and welfare benefit from the presence of an otherwise redundant supplier in the market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IO: Firm Structure\",\"volume\":\"303 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IO: Firm Structure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3693726\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IO: Firm Structure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3693726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文探讨了竞争企业外包给共同供应商的动机,并表明即使供应商在投入生产方面没有成本优势,企业也会外包。供应商的合同报价产生了成本不对称,改变了产品的市场竞争,提高了其中一个客户的竞争地位。非线性合同的使用对于外包的出现至关重要。供应商有目的地避免行业利润最大化,以扩大其利润份额。消费者和福利都受益于市场上存在的一个多余的供应商。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outsourcing without Cost Advantages
This paper explores the incentives of competing firms to outsource to a common supplier and shows that firms outsource even when the supplier does not have a cost advantage in input production. The suppliers contract offers generate cost asymmetry, alter product market competition, and improve the competitive position of one of its customers. The use of nonlinear contracts is crucial for the emergence of outsourcing. The supplier purposefully avoids industry profit maximization to enlarge its profits share. Both consumers and welfare benefit from the presence of an otherwise redundant supplier in the market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Double Marginalization and Misplacement in Online Advertising Compensating with Style? The Role of Compensation-Committee Experience on CEO Pay Assessing the Value of Cooperative Membership: A Case of Dairy Marketing in the United States Vertical Integration and Bargaining: Linear vs Two-part tariffs Public Company Auditing Around the Securities Exchange Act
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1