基金会联盟为荣誉学生、少数族裔学生、女性学生和转学生整合了课程和项目

K. Watson, M. Anderson-Rowland
{"title":"基金会联盟为荣誉学生、少数族裔学生、女性学生和转学生整合了课程和项目","authors":"K. Watson, M. Anderson-Rowland","doi":"10.1109/FIE.1995.483192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Foundation Coalition includes seven institutions, all of which are in the process of developing an engineering curriculum that incorporates the integration of courses, the utilization of active and cooperative learning in the classroom, and the use of technology in the classroom to enhance the level and sophistication of content and problems approached. During the 1994-1995 academic year, all of these institutions piloted a freshman curriculum that involved various levels of integration of the courses that students take. Typically, this involved the integration of physics, calculus, English, engineering design graphics, chemistry and engineering problem solving over both semesters of the freshman year. In addition, the students took humanities or social science electives. One of the goals of this Coalition is to increase the enrolment and support of women and underrepresented minorities. This paper describes several conflicts which the integrated approach created for students in special programs in the College of Engineering. Most of these programs have existed for many years in the College, and have activities with proven records for enhancing the educational experience and retention in engineering. These conflicts are described, and some of the initial strategies for resolving the conflicts are presented, as well as plans for assuring that these programs work together effectively as the integrated program expands and becomes institutionalized. Resolving these conflicts is a challenge the integrated curriculum must meet in order to be effective for a large number of students.","PeriodicalId":137465,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century","volume":"679 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interfaces between the Foundation Coalition integrated curriculum and programs for honors, minority, women, and transfer students\",\"authors\":\"K. Watson, M. Anderson-Rowland\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.1995.483192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Foundation Coalition includes seven institutions, all of which are in the process of developing an engineering curriculum that incorporates the integration of courses, the utilization of active and cooperative learning in the classroom, and the use of technology in the classroom to enhance the level and sophistication of content and problems approached. During the 1994-1995 academic year, all of these institutions piloted a freshman curriculum that involved various levels of integration of the courses that students take. Typically, this involved the integration of physics, calculus, English, engineering design graphics, chemistry and engineering problem solving over both semesters of the freshman year. In addition, the students took humanities or social science electives. One of the goals of this Coalition is to increase the enrolment and support of women and underrepresented minorities. This paper describes several conflicts which the integrated approach created for students in special programs in the College of Engineering. Most of these programs have existed for many years in the College, and have activities with proven records for enhancing the educational experience and retention in engineering. These conflicts are described, and some of the initial strategies for resolving the conflicts are presented, as well as plans for assuring that these programs work together effectively as the integrated program expands and becomes institutionalized. Resolving these conflicts is a challenge the integrated curriculum must meet in order to be effective for a large number of students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century\",\"volume\":\"679 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1995.483192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1995.483192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

基金会联盟包括七个机构,所有这些机构都在开发一个工程课程,该课程包括课程整合,在课堂上利用主动和合作学习,以及在课堂上使用技术来提高内容和问题的水平和复杂性。在1994-1995学年期间,所有这些机构都试行了新生课程,其中包括学生所修课程的不同程度的整合。通常,这涉及到在大一的两个学期中整合物理、微积分、英语、工程设计图形、化学和工程问题解决。此外,学生们还选修人文或社会科学的选修课。该联盟的目标之一是增加妇女和代表性不足的少数民族的入学率和支持。本文阐述了综合教学方法在工程学院专业学生中产生的几个冲突。这些项目中的大多数已经在学院里存在了很多年,并且在提高教育经验和留住工程专业学生方面有良好的记录。对这些冲突进行了描述,并提出了一些解决冲突的初步策略,以及确保这些程序在集成程序扩展和制度化时有效地协同工作的计划。解决这些冲突是综合课程必须面对的挑战,以便对大量学生有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interfaces between the Foundation Coalition integrated curriculum and programs for honors, minority, women, and transfer students
The Foundation Coalition includes seven institutions, all of which are in the process of developing an engineering curriculum that incorporates the integration of courses, the utilization of active and cooperative learning in the classroom, and the use of technology in the classroom to enhance the level and sophistication of content and problems approached. During the 1994-1995 academic year, all of these institutions piloted a freshman curriculum that involved various levels of integration of the courses that students take. Typically, this involved the integration of physics, calculus, English, engineering design graphics, chemistry and engineering problem solving over both semesters of the freshman year. In addition, the students took humanities or social science electives. One of the goals of this Coalition is to increase the enrolment and support of women and underrepresented minorities. This paper describes several conflicts which the integrated approach created for students in special programs in the College of Engineering. Most of these programs have existed for many years in the College, and have activities with proven records for enhancing the educational experience and retention in engineering. These conflicts are described, and some of the initial strategies for resolving the conflicts are presented, as well as plans for assuring that these programs work together effectively as the integrated program expands and becomes institutionalized. Resolving these conflicts is a challenge the integrated curriculum must meet in order to be effective for a large number of students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interfaces between the Foundation Coalition integrated curriculum and programs for honors, minority, women, and transfer students Toward a pre-disciplinary introductory design sequence People, product and process: interactive multimedia case study in integrated design and manufacturing strategies Systems model for learning A faculty-driven quality initiative at the Colorado School of Mines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1