在PVSystem中,ANN-BP与ANN-PSO作为学习算法跟踪MPP的比较

A. Muhtar, I. Mustika, Suharyanto
{"title":"在PVSystem中,ANN-BP与ANN-PSO作为学习算法跟踪MPP的比较","authors":"A. Muhtar, I. Mustika, Suharyanto","doi":"10.1109/INAES.2017.8068573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The P-V curve of photovoltaic system exhibits multiple peaks under various conditions of function and changes in meteorological conditions which reduce the effectiveness of conventional maximum power point tracking (MPPT) methods. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) is one of soft computing used for learning, modeling, and analyzing a very complicated phenomenon. Furthermore, there is an algorithm based on meta-heuristic, which is usually used for some optimization problems. One of meta-heuristic algorithms used in this paper is Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm. In this paper, a comparison between ANN using PSO and ANN used back propagation as a learning algorithm to track MPP in photovoltaic system. Each training model was conducted with different learning rate, but the number of neurons and activation functions used was similar in each training model. To evaluate both training models of ANN, Mean Square Error (MSE) was used. The result showed that ANN using PSO as a training algorithm require 17 epochs to convergent, but ANN using back propagation require 105 epochs to convergent. Furthermore, the average value of power generated from PV system, ANN using PSO as training algorithm for track MPP was 90.92 kW and ANN using back propagation as training algorithm for track MPP was 88.65 kW.","PeriodicalId":382919,"journal":{"name":"2017 7th International Annual Engineering Seminar (InAES)","volume":"28 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The comparison of ANN-BP and ANN-PSO as learning algorithm to track MPP in PVSystem\",\"authors\":\"A. Muhtar, I. Mustika, Suharyanto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INAES.2017.8068573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The P-V curve of photovoltaic system exhibits multiple peaks under various conditions of function and changes in meteorological conditions which reduce the effectiveness of conventional maximum power point tracking (MPPT) methods. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) is one of soft computing used for learning, modeling, and analyzing a very complicated phenomenon. Furthermore, there is an algorithm based on meta-heuristic, which is usually used for some optimization problems. One of meta-heuristic algorithms used in this paper is Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm. In this paper, a comparison between ANN using PSO and ANN used back propagation as a learning algorithm to track MPP in photovoltaic system. Each training model was conducted with different learning rate, but the number of neurons and activation functions used was similar in each training model. To evaluate both training models of ANN, Mean Square Error (MSE) was used. The result showed that ANN using PSO as a training algorithm require 17 epochs to convergent, but ANN using back propagation require 105 epochs to convergent. Furthermore, the average value of power generated from PV system, ANN using PSO as training algorithm for track MPP was 90.92 kW and ANN using back propagation as training algorithm for track MPP was 88.65 kW.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 7th International Annual Engineering Seminar (InAES)\",\"volume\":\"28 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 7th International Annual Engineering Seminar (InAES)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INAES.2017.8068573\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 7th International Annual Engineering Seminar (InAES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INAES.2017.8068573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

光伏系统的P-V曲线在各种功能条件和气象条件变化下呈现多峰特征,降低了传统最大功率点跟踪方法的有效性。人工神经网络(ANN)是一种用于学习、建模和分析非常复杂现象的软计算技术。此外,还有一种基于元启发式的算法,通常用于一些优化问题。本文使用的一种元启发式算法是粒子群优化算法(PSO)。本文比较了采用粒子群算法的人工神经网络与采用反向传播作为学习算法的人工神经网络在光伏系统MPP跟踪中的应用。每个训练模型以不同的学习速率进行,但每个训练模型中使用的神经元数量和激活函数是相似的。采用均方误差(MSE)对两种神经网络训练模型进行评价。结果表明,使用粒子群算法的神经网络需要17个epoch才能收敛,而使用反向传播算法的神经网络需要105个epoch才能收敛。此外,采用粒子群优化算法的神经网络对轨道MPP的平均发电量为90.92 kW,采用反向传播算法的神经网络对轨道MPP的平均发电量为88.65 kW。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The comparison of ANN-BP and ANN-PSO as learning algorithm to track MPP in PVSystem
The P-V curve of photovoltaic system exhibits multiple peaks under various conditions of function and changes in meteorological conditions which reduce the effectiveness of conventional maximum power point tracking (MPPT) methods. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) is one of soft computing used for learning, modeling, and analyzing a very complicated phenomenon. Furthermore, there is an algorithm based on meta-heuristic, which is usually used for some optimization problems. One of meta-heuristic algorithms used in this paper is Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm. In this paper, a comparison between ANN using PSO and ANN used back propagation as a learning algorithm to track MPP in photovoltaic system. Each training model was conducted with different learning rate, but the number of neurons and activation functions used was similar in each training model. To evaluate both training models of ANN, Mean Square Error (MSE) was used. The result showed that ANN using PSO as a training algorithm require 17 epochs to convergent, but ANN using back propagation require 105 epochs to convergent. Furthermore, the average value of power generated from PV system, ANN using PSO as training algorithm for track MPP was 90.92 kW and ANN using back propagation as training algorithm for track MPP was 88.65 kW.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The comparison of ANN-BP and ANN-PSO as learning algorithm to track MPP in PVSystem A microclimate closed house control design for broiler strain Design optimization of Quasi-flat linear PM generator for wave energy converter in south coast of Java using flower pollination algorithm Investigation of tertiary fault in 500/150/66kV 500MVA inter bus transformer Automatic VSAT antenna pointing system featured with non-horizontal alignment autocorrect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1