决策分析中的直觉模糊Topsis方法及距离测度的实验分析

Ting-Yu Chen, Yi-Wen Li
{"title":"决策分析中的直觉模糊Topsis方法及距离测度的实验分析","authors":"Ting-Yu Chen, Yi-Wen Li","doi":"10.30166/PPMR.200907.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to extend the concept of the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for solving multiple attribute decision analysis problems with intuitionistic fuzzy data that expressed in the intuitionistic fuzzy sets to obtain another degree of hesitation. An experimental analysis was conducted to compare preference order by different separation measures that calculate the distance between the alternative and its positive-ideal and negative-ideal solutions. The consistency rate, the contradiction rate of the best alternative, the inversion rate between the better alternatives and worse ones, and average Spearman correlation coefficients are utilized to conduct a pairwise comparison for all separation measures. The results which are inclusive of 100 combinations of 10 different number of alternatives and attributes indicate that the preference orders are hardly identical using different separation measures in the intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method.","PeriodicalId":431367,"journal":{"name":"Pan-Pacific Management Review","volume":"12 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Intuitionistic Fuzzy Topsis Method in Decision Analysis and Experimental Anaysis on Distance Measures\",\"authors\":\"Ting-Yu Chen, Yi-Wen Li\",\"doi\":\"10.30166/PPMR.200907.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to extend the concept of the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for solving multiple attribute decision analysis problems with intuitionistic fuzzy data that expressed in the intuitionistic fuzzy sets to obtain another degree of hesitation. An experimental analysis was conducted to compare preference order by different separation measures that calculate the distance between the alternative and its positive-ideal and negative-ideal solutions. The consistency rate, the contradiction rate of the best alternative, the inversion rate between the better alternatives and worse ones, and average Spearman correlation coefficients are utilized to conduct a pairwise comparison for all separation measures. The results which are inclusive of 100 combinations of 10 different number of alternatives and attributes indicate that the preference orders are hardly identical using different separation measures in the intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pan-Pacific Management Review\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pan-Pacific Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30166/PPMR.200907.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pan-Pacific Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30166/PPMR.200907.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是将TOPSIS (Order Preference Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution)的概念扩展,用于解决直觉模糊数据以直觉模糊集表示的多属性决策分析问题,以获得另一种程度的犹豫。通过不同的分离措施,计算了备选方案与其正理想解和负理想解之间的距离,进行了实验分析,比较了偏好顺序。利用一致性率、最佳方案的矛盾率、最佳方案与最差方案的反转率、平均Spearman相关系数对各分离措施进行两两比较。结果表明,在直觉模糊TOPSIS方法中,使用不同的分离措施,优选顺序几乎不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Intuitionistic Fuzzy Topsis Method in Decision Analysis and Experimental Anaysis on Distance Measures
The purpose of this study is to extend the concept of the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for solving multiple attribute decision analysis problems with intuitionistic fuzzy data that expressed in the intuitionistic fuzzy sets to obtain another degree of hesitation. An experimental analysis was conducted to compare preference order by different separation measures that calculate the distance between the alternative and its positive-ideal and negative-ideal solutions. The consistency rate, the contradiction rate of the best alternative, the inversion rate between the better alternatives and worse ones, and average Spearman correlation coefficients are utilized to conduct a pairwise comparison for all separation measures. The results which are inclusive of 100 combinations of 10 different number of alternatives and attributes indicate that the preference orders are hardly identical using different separation measures in the intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact Of Journal Ranking Systems on Emerging Journals and Academic Freedom: How Should Academics Respond? Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision Analysis with Dissonance Reduction For Optimistic/Pessimistic Decision Makers The Relationship between Authenticity and the Souvenir Purchase Intent Exploring Anchoring and Communication Effects from Message Manipulation: An Experimental Study about Recycling An Integrated Model of Consumer Involvement Based on Fuzzy Automata
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1