双胎和非双胎学生学习结果和学生辍学数据分析

E. Török, Eliza Angeli
{"title":"双胎和非双胎学生学习结果和学生辍学数据分析","authors":"E. Török, Eliza Angeli","doi":"10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dual training form was the first introduced at John von Neumann University among higher education institutions in Hungary in 2012, when 24 vehicle engineer students started their studies and 2 industrial partner companies joined. Over time these numbers increased significantly, more and more training areas were also involved including engineering, information technology, agriculture, economic, as well as other BSc studies. In 2019, 303 undergraduate students were studying in dual form at our University and the number of industrial partners training students has increased to 40. Looking back over the past eight years, it became important to review and analyse the students’ so far achieved results. The aim of our study was to examine the student learning outcomes of dual and non-dual students with particular regard to student dropout. In the research, we compared weighted learning outcome averages and correlative credit indexes of dual and non-dual students to measure student performance for the period between 2015 and 2019. The results revealed that both the credit index and the weighted learning outcome average of dual students surpassed that of non-dual students at Engineering and Computer Science Faculty. According to the data referring to courses, operating in dual training forms dropout among dual students is significantly lower than among non-dual students. Dropout data may also indicate that due to its nature dual training proves to be a more efficient ‘ handrail’ to take part in the training, it can be stated that a sort of cohesion, positive ‘ community consciousness’ are present among dual students supporting motivation to follow their studies, attending the institution.","PeriodicalId":416694,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","volume":"37 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of dual and non-dual student learning outcomes and student dropout data\",\"authors\":\"E. Török, Eliza Angeli\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dual training form was the first introduced at John von Neumann University among higher education institutions in Hungary in 2012, when 24 vehicle engineer students started their studies and 2 industrial partner companies joined. Over time these numbers increased significantly, more and more training areas were also involved including engineering, information technology, agriculture, economic, as well as other BSc studies. In 2019, 303 undergraduate students were studying in dual form at our University and the number of industrial partners training students has increased to 40. Looking back over the past eight years, it became important to review and analyse the students’ so far achieved results. The aim of our study was to examine the student learning outcomes of dual and non-dual students with particular regard to student dropout. In the research, we compared weighted learning outcome averages and correlative credit indexes of dual and non-dual students to measure student performance for the period between 2015 and 2019. The results revealed that both the credit index and the weighted learning outcome average of dual students surpassed that of non-dual students at Engineering and Computer Science Faculty. According to the data referring to courses, operating in dual training forms dropout among dual students is significantly lower than among non-dual students. Dropout data may also indicate that due to its nature dual training proves to be a more efficient ‘ handrail’ to take part in the training, it can be stated that a sort of cohesion, positive ‘ community consciousness’ are present among dual students supporting motivation to follow their studies, attending the institution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)\",\"volume\":\"37 10\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766648\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2012年,匈牙利约翰·冯·诺伊曼大学在高等教育机构中首次引入了双轨制培训形式,当时有24名汽车工程专业的学生开始学习,两家工业合作伙伴公司加入。随着时间的推移,这些数字显著增加,涉及的培训领域也越来越多,包括工程、信息技术、农业、经济以及其他理学士学位研究。2019年,我校有303名本科生以双轨制形式在我校学习,工业合作伙伴培养学生的数量增加到40个。回顾过去的八年,回顾和分析学生们迄今取得的成绩变得非常重要。本研究的目的是考察双胎和非双胎学生的学习结果,特别是关于学生辍学的情况。在研究中,我们比较了双重和非双重学生的加权学习成果平均值和相关学分指标,以衡量2015年至2019年期间学生的表现。结果显示,工程与计算机科学学院双学位学生的学分指数和加权学习成果平均值均超过非双学位学生。根据课程数据,双元制学生的辍学率明显低于非双元制学生。辍学数据也可能表明,由于双重培训的性质被证明是参与培训的更有效的“扶手”,可以说,在双重学生中存在一种凝聚力,积极的“社区意识”,支持他们继续学习,参加该机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of dual and non-dual student learning outcomes and student dropout data
Dual training form was the first introduced at John von Neumann University among higher education institutions in Hungary in 2012, when 24 vehicle engineer students started their studies and 2 industrial partner companies joined. Over time these numbers increased significantly, more and more training areas were also involved including engineering, information technology, agriculture, economic, as well as other BSc studies. In 2019, 303 undergraduate students were studying in dual form at our University and the number of industrial partners training students has increased to 40. Looking back over the past eight years, it became important to review and analyse the students’ so far achieved results. The aim of our study was to examine the student learning outcomes of dual and non-dual students with particular regard to student dropout. In the research, we compared weighted learning outcome averages and correlative credit indexes of dual and non-dual students to measure student performance for the period between 2015 and 2019. The results revealed that both the credit index and the weighted learning outcome average of dual students surpassed that of non-dual students at Engineering and Computer Science Faculty. According to the data referring to courses, operating in dual training forms dropout among dual students is significantly lower than among non-dual students. Dropout data may also indicate that due to its nature dual training proves to be a more efficient ‘ handrail’ to take part in the training, it can be stated that a sort of cohesion, positive ‘ community consciousness’ are present among dual students supporting motivation to follow their studies, attending the institution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Virtual Laboratory Workshop in Physics Hands-on Physics Experiments for K-6 Teachers at CERN Analysis of dual and non-dual student learning outcomes and student dropout data A Proposed Machine Learning Based Approach to Support Students with Learning Difficulties in The Post-Pandemic Norm Fab Lab-based learning: an environment to promote Women and Leadership in Engineering Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1