基于简化弹塑性分析方法的高温核设备热交换器评价途径

U. Devi, Machel Morrison, T. Hassan
{"title":"基于简化弹塑性分析方法的高温核设备热交换器评价途径","authors":"U. Devi, Machel Morrison, T. Hassan","doi":"10.1115/pvp2019-93468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Printed Circuit Heat Exchangers (PCHEs) are well-suited for Very High Temperature Reactors (VHTRs) due to high compactness and efficiency for heat transfer. The design of PCHE must be robust enough to withstand possible failure caused by cyclic loading during high temperature operation. The current rules in ASME Code Section III Division 5 to evaluate strain limits and creep-fatigue damage based on elastic analysis method have been deemed infeasible at temperatures above 650°C. Hence, these rules are inapplicable for temperatures ranging from 760–950°C for VHTRs. A full inelastic analysis method with complex constitutive material description as an alternative, on the other hand, is time consuming; hence impracticable. Therefore, the simplified Elastic-Perfectly Plastic (EPP) analysis methodology is used as a solution in ASME Code Section III Division 5. The current literature, however, lacks any study on the performance evaluation of PCHE through EPP analysis. To address these issues, this study initiates the pathway of EPP evaluation of an actual size PCHE starting with elastic orthotropic analysis in the global scale. Subsequently, preliminary planning for analyzing intermediate and local submodels are provided to determine channel level responses to evaluate PCHE performance against strain limits and creep-fatigue damage using Code Case-N861 and N862 respectively.","PeriodicalId":150804,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3: Design and Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pathway to Evaluate Printed Circuit Heat Exchanger Based on Simplified Elastic-Perfectly Plastic Analysis Methodology for High Temperature Nuclear Service\",\"authors\":\"U. Devi, Machel Morrison, T. Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/pvp2019-93468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Printed Circuit Heat Exchangers (PCHEs) are well-suited for Very High Temperature Reactors (VHTRs) due to high compactness and efficiency for heat transfer. The design of PCHE must be robust enough to withstand possible failure caused by cyclic loading during high temperature operation. The current rules in ASME Code Section III Division 5 to evaluate strain limits and creep-fatigue damage based on elastic analysis method have been deemed infeasible at temperatures above 650°C. Hence, these rules are inapplicable for temperatures ranging from 760–950°C for VHTRs. A full inelastic analysis method with complex constitutive material description as an alternative, on the other hand, is time consuming; hence impracticable. Therefore, the simplified Elastic-Perfectly Plastic (EPP) analysis methodology is used as a solution in ASME Code Section III Division 5. The current literature, however, lacks any study on the performance evaluation of PCHE through EPP analysis. To address these issues, this study initiates the pathway of EPP evaluation of an actual size PCHE starting with elastic orthotropic analysis in the global scale. Subsequently, preliminary planning for analyzing intermediate and local submodels are provided to determine channel level responses to evaluate PCHE performance against strain limits and creep-fatigue damage using Code Case-N861 and N862 respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 3: Design and Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 3: Design and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2019-93468\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3: Design and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2019-93468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印刷电路热交换器(PCHEs)非常适合于甚高温反应器(vhtr),因为它具有高紧凑性和传热效率。PCHE的设计必须足够坚固,以承受高温运行时循环加载可能引起的故障。ASME规范第III节第5部分中基于弹性分析方法评估应变极限和蠕变疲劳损伤的现行规则被认为在650°C以上的温度下是不可行的。因此,这些规则不适用于温度范围为760-950°C的vhtr。另一方面,采用复杂本构材料描述的全非弹性分析方法耗时长;因此行不通的。因此,简化的弹塑性(EPP)分析方法被用作ASME规范第III部分第5部分的解决方案。然而,目前的文献缺乏通过EPP分析对PCHE绩效评价的研究。为了解决这些问题,本研究从全球尺度的弹性正交各向异性分析开始,启动了实际尺寸PCHE的EPP评估途径。随后,提供了分析中间和局部子模型的初步规划,以确定通道级响应,分别使用Code Case-N861和N862评估PCHE在应变极限和蠕变疲劳损伤下的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pathway to Evaluate Printed Circuit Heat Exchanger Based on Simplified Elastic-Perfectly Plastic Analysis Methodology for High Temperature Nuclear Service
Printed Circuit Heat Exchangers (PCHEs) are well-suited for Very High Temperature Reactors (VHTRs) due to high compactness and efficiency for heat transfer. The design of PCHE must be robust enough to withstand possible failure caused by cyclic loading during high temperature operation. The current rules in ASME Code Section III Division 5 to evaluate strain limits and creep-fatigue damage based on elastic analysis method have been deemed infeasible at temperatures above 650°C. Hence, these rules are inapplicable for temperatures ranging from 760–950°C for VHTRs. A full inelastic analysis method with complex constitutive material description as an alternative, on the other hand, is time consuming; hence impracticable. Therefore, the simplified Elastic-Perfectly Plastic (EPP) analysis methodology is used as a solution in ASME Code Section III Division 5. The current literature, however, lacks any study on the performance evaluation of PCHE through EPP analysis. To address these issues, this study initiates the pathway of EPP evaluation of an actual size PCHE starting with elastic orthotropic analysis in the global scale. Subsequently, preliminary planning for analyzing intermediate and local submodels are provided to determine channel level responses to evaluate PCHE performance against strain limits and creep-fatigue damage using Code Case-N861 and N862 respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Study of Packed Catalyst Bed Stresses for Outward Radial Flow Reactors Alternative Design Approach by Finite Element Analysis for High Pressure Equipment A Review of Temperature Reduction Methods in Codes and Standards for Pipe Supports Elephant Foot Buckling Analysis of Large Unanchored Oil Storage Tanks With Tapered Shells Subjected to Foundation Settlement Development of Stress Intensification Factors for Collared Type Piping Joints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1