Magaly Moreno, M. Besterfield-Sacre, L. Shuman, H. Wolfe, C. Atman
{"title":"对EC-2000结果的自我评估信心:跨机构性别和种族差异的研究","authors":"Magaly Moreno, M. Besterfield-Sacre, L. Shuman, H. Wolfe, C. Atman","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2000.897524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the establishment of the challenging Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC-2000) accreditation guidelines, institutions must obtain a more informed understanding of students' underlying knowledge, skills, and attitudes as they begin, matriculate, and eventually complete their engineering studies. As engineering educators collect information about how students demonstrate achievement in the \"a-k\" outcomes, questions arise as to whether differences exist between student groups, specifically gender and ethnicity differences. Such differences may potentially affect a student's performance and persistence in engineering. Prior research indicates that engineering students' initial attitudes, along with gender and ethnicity, are linked to first term probation and retention in the freshman year. How they are linked to achievement of the EC-2000 outcomes is still an open question. At the University of Pittsburgh, we are investigating how confidence in the outcomes changes throughout a student's undergraduate engineering career and how these self-assessed outcomes correlate with other 'a-k' outcome metrics. As part of the larger study, the paper explores the issue of how confidence in the outcomes is influenced by gender and ethnicity factors at the freshman level. Using the Pittsburgh Freshman Engineering Attitude Post-Survey/sup TM/ and data from 16 US engineering schools, who took the questionnaire during the 1998-99 academic year, we have found a number of significant and consistent differences in the 11 outcomes with respect to student gender and ethnicity.","PeriodicalId":371740,"journal":{"name":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","volume":"45 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-assessed confidence in EC-2000 outcomes: a study of gender and ethnicity differences across institutions\",\"authors\":\"Magaly Moreno, M. Besterfield-Sacre, L. Shuman, H. Wolfe, C. Atman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2000.897524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the establishment of the challenging Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC-2000) accreditation guidelines, institutions must obtain a more informed understanding of students' underlying knowledge, skills, and attitudes as they begin, matriculate, and eventually complete their engineering studies. As engineering educators collect information about how students demonstrate achievement in the \\\"a-k\\\" outcomes, questions arise as to whether differences exist between student groups, specifically gender and ethnicity differences. Such differences may potentially affect a student's performance and persistence in engineering. Prior research indicates that engineering students' initial attitudes, along with gender and ethnicity, are linked to first term probation and retention in the freshman year. How they are linked to achievement of the EC-2000 outcomes is still an open question. At the University of Pittsburgh, we are investigating how confidence in the outcomes changes throughout a student's undergraduate engineering career and how these self-assessed outcomes correlate with other 'a-k' outcome metrics. As part of the larger study, the paper explores the issue of how confidence in the outcomes is influenced by gender and ethnicity factors at the freshman level. Using the Pittsburgh Freshman Engineering Attitude Post-Survey/sup TM/ and data from 16 US engineering schools, who took the questionnaire during the 1998-99 academic year, we have found a number of significant and consistent differences in the 11 outcomes with respect to student gender and ethnicity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)\",\"volume\":\"45 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.897524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.897524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26
摘要
随着具有挑战性的工程标准2000 (EC-2000)认证指南的建立,各院校必须在学生开始、入学和最终完成工程学习时,对学生的基本知识、技能和态度有更深入的了解。随着工程教育工作者收集有关学生如何在“a-k”成绩中表现出成就的信息,学生群体之间是否存在差异,特别是性别和种族差异的问题就出现了。这种差异可能会潜在地影响学生在工程方面的表现和坚持。先前的研究表明,工科学生最初的态度,以及性别和种族,与第一年的第一学期试用期和留校率有关。它们如何与欧共体-2000成果的实现联系起来,仍是一个悬而未决的问题。在匹兹堡大学(University of Pittsburgh),我们正在调查学生对结果的信心在整个本科工程职业生涯中是如何变化的,以及这些自我评估的结果如何与其他“a-k”结果指标相关联。作为更大规模研究的一部分,本文探讨了新生对结果的信心如何受到性别和种族因素的影响。利用匹兹堡大学新生工程态度调查(sup TM)和来自16所美国工程学院的数据,他们在1998-99学年接受了问卷调查,我们发现了11项结果中关于学生性别和种族的一些显著和一致的差异。
Self-assessed confidence in EC-2000 outcomes: a study of gender and ethnicity differences across institutions
With the establishment of the challenging Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC-2000) accreditation guidelines, institutions must obtain a more informed understanding of students' underlying knowledge, skills, and attitudes as they begin, matriculate, and eventually complete their engineering studies. As engineering educators collect information about how students demonstrate achievement in the "a-k" outcomes, questions arise as to whether differences exist between student groups, specifically gender and ethnicity differences. Such differences may potentially affect a student's performance and persistence in engineering. Prior research indicates that engineering students' initial attitudes, along with gender and ethnicity, are linked to first term probation and retention in the freshman year. How they are linked to achievement of the EC-2000 outcomes is still an open question. At the University of Pittsburgh, we are investigating how confidence in the outcomes changes throughout a student's undergraduate engineering career and how these self-assessed outcomes correlate with other 'a-k' outcome metrics. As part of the larger study, the paper explores the issue of how confidence in the outcomes is influenced by gender and ethnicity factors at the freshman level. Using the Pittsburgh Freshman Engineering Attitude Post-Survey/sup TM/ and data from 16 US engineering schools, who took the questionnaire during the 1998-99 academic year, we have found a number of significant and consistent differences in the 11 outcomes with respect to student gender and ethnicity.