控制择校的稳定机制

Minoru Kitahara, Yasunori Okumura
{"title":"控制择校的稳定机制","authors":"Minoru Kitahara, Yasunori Okumura","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3806916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider a controlled school choice model where students are divided into several types such as socioeconomically advantaged and disadvantaged. The priority for a school is dependent on the type distribution of the assignment. Our model is a generalization of several models in previous studies such as those in which the priorities are based on type quotas and/or reserves. We consider the case where the priority for each school is represented by a weak order and introduce a stable and group strategy-proof mechanism. Moreover, if the priority order for each school is restricted to be a strict order, then the mechanism is also a student optimal stable one. We generalize the model allowing that the priority orders for some schools are not weak, but partial. In this case, a stable mechanism is also introduced.","PeriodicalId":176300,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Intertemporal Consumer Choice & Savings eJournal","volume":"64 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stable Mechanisms in Controlled School Choice\",\"authors\":\"Minoru Kitahara, Yasunori Okumura\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3806916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider a controlled school choice model where students are divided into several types such as socioeconomically advantaged and disadvantaged. The priority for a school is dependent on the type distribution of the assignment. Our model is a generalization of several models in previous studies such as those in which the priorities are based on type quotas and/or reserves. We consider the case where the priority for each school is represented by a weak order and introduce a stable and group strategy-proof mechanism. Moreover, if the priority order for each school is restricted to be a strict order, then the mechanism is also a student optimal stable one. We generalize the model allowing that the priority orders for some schools are not weak, but partial. In this case, a stable mechanism is also introduced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":176300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microeconomics: Intertemporal Consumer Choice & Savings eJournal\",\"volume\":\"64 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microeconomics: Intertemporal Consumer Choice & Savings eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3806916\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Intertemporal Consumer Choice & Savings eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3806916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

我们考虑了一个受控的学校选择模型,其中学生分为几种类型,如社会经济优势和劣势。学校的优先级取决于作业的类型分布。我们的模型是以前研究中几个模型的概括,例如那些优先级基于类型配额和/或储备的模型。我们考虑了每个学校的优先级由弱顺序表示的情况,并引入了一个稳定的、防群体策略的机制。此外,如果将各学校的优先顺序限制为严格顺序,则该机制也是学生最优稳定机制。我们对模型进行了推广,使得一些学校的优先顺序不是弱的,而是部分的。在这种情况下,还引入了稳定机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stable Mechanisms in Controlled School Choice
We consider a controlled school choice model where students are divided into several types such as socioeconomically advantaged and disadvantaged. The priority for a school is dependent on the type distribution of the assignment. Our model is a generalization of several models in previous studies such as those in which the priorities are based on type quotas and/or reserves. We consider the case where the priority for each school is represented by a weak order and introduce a stable and group strategy-proof mechanism. Moreover, if the priority order for each school is restricted to be a strict order, then the mechanism is also a student optimal stable one. We generalize the model allowing that the priority orders for some schools are not weak, but partial. In this case, a stable mechanism is also introduced.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Recent National Policies and Health Outbreaks on U.S. E-Cigarette Sales Overreaction to Capital Taxation in Saving Decisions Fallacy of Fiscal Discipline: Spirit of MMT Through Mathematical Analysis The Why and How of Quality-Differentiated Demand Evaluating the Effect of Soda Taxes Using a Dynamic Model of Rational Addiction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1