南非对虚假广告的监管:2008年第68号消费者保护法与自我监管分析

Y. Mupangavanhu, Dominique Kerchhoff
{"title":"南非对虚假广告的监管:2008年第68号消费者保护法与自我监管分析","authors":"Y. Mupangavanhu, Dominique Kerchhoff","doi":"10.47348/samlj/v33/i2a5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (CPA) regulates the provision of goods and services, the conclusion of consumer contracts as well as the promotion and marketing of goods and services. It also protects consumers from unscrupulous advertisers who use false and misleading advertisements to induce consumers to enter into contracts which they would otherwise not have concluded. This article seeks to critically analyse the legislative provisions relating to false, misleading, and deceptive advertising, and the seemingly accessible and efficient legal redress mechanism created under the CPA. Self-regulation by bodies such as the Advertising Regulatory Board, which is responsible for the regulation of the advertising industry in South Africa, is also discussed in detail. The article concludes that the co-existence of the CPA and self-regulation is pertinent to ensure that consumers are adequately protected from unscrupulous advertisements. This is because self-regulation provides an additional layer of protection to consumers. It is also argued that the forums created under the CPA should be given powers to declare certain promotional activities and advertisements unfair, unjust or unreasonable.","PeriodicalId":118675,"journal":{"name":"South African Mercantile Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Regulation of False Advertising in South Africa: An Analysis of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 and Self-Regulation\",\"authors\":\"Y. Mupangavanhu, Dominique Kerchhoff\",\"doi\":\"10.47348/samlj/v33/i2a5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (CPA) regulates the provision of goods and services, the conclusion of consumer contracts as well as the promotion and marketing of goods and services. It also protects consumers from unscrupulous advertisers who use false and misleading advertisements to induce consumers to enter into contracts which they would otherwise not have concluded. This article seeks to critically analyse the legislative provisions relating to false, misleading, and deceptive advertising, and the seemingly accessible and efficient legal redress mechanism created under the CPA. Self-regulation by bodies such as the Advertising Regulatory Board, which is responsible for the regulation of the advertising industry in South Africa, is also discussed in detail. The article concludes that the co-existence of the CPA and self-regulation is pertinent to ensure that consumers are adequately protected from unscrupulous advertisements. This is because self-regulation provides an additional layer of protection to consumers. It is also argued that the forums created under the CPA should be given powers to declare certain promotional activities and advertisements unfair, unjust or unreasonable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Mercantile Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Mercantile Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47348/samlj/v33/i2a5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Mercantile Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47348/samlj/v33/i2a5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2008年第68号消费者保护法(CPA)规范了商品和服务的提供、消费者合同的签订以及商品和服务的推广和营销。它还保护消费者免受无良广告商的侵害,这些广告商利用虚假和误导性广告诱使消费者签订他们本来不会签订的合同。本文试图批判性地分析与虚假、误导和欺骗性广告有关的立法规定,以及在《CPA》下建立的看似容易获得和有效的法律补救机制。还详细讨论了诸如负责南非广告业监管的广告监管委员会等机构的自我监管。本文的结论是,注册会计师和自我监管的共存是相关的,以确保消费者得到充分的保护,免受不道德的广告。这是因为自我监管为消费者提供了额外的保护。还有人认为,根据《全面和平协定》设立的论坛应被赋予宣布某些促销活动和广告不公平、不公正或不合理的权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Regulation of False Advertising in South Africa: An Analysis of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 and Self-Regulation
The Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (CPA) regulates the provision of goods and services, the conclusion of consumer contracts as well as the promotion and marketing of goods and services. It also protects consumers from unscrupulous advertisers who use false and misleading advertisements to induce consumers to enter into contracts which they would otherwise not have concluded. This article seeks to critically analyse the legislative provisions relating to false, misleading, and deceptive advertising, and the seemingly accessible and efficient legal redress mechanism created under the CPA. Self-regulation by bodies such as the Advertising Regulatory Board, which is responsible for the regulation of the advertising industry in South Africa, is also discussed in detail. The article concludes that the co-existence of the CPA and self-regulation is pertinent to ensure that consumers are adequately protected from unscrupulous advertisements. This is because self-regulation provides an additional layer of protection to consumers. It is also argued that the forums created under the CPA should be given powers to declare certain promotional activities and advertisements unfair, unjust or unreasonable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Regulation of False Advertising in South Africa: An Analysis of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 and Self-Regulation Case Notes: Interdicting a disciplinary enquiry: Golding v HCI Managerial Services (Pty) Ltd (2015) 36 ILJ 1098 (LC) Revisited Reinstatement in the Context of ‘Deemed Dismissal’: A Critical Analysis of Recent Case Law Accountability in the twin peaks model of financial regulation in South Africa The Impact of Cryptocurrencies on the General Powers and Duties of South African Insolvency Practitioners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1