深圳市某三甲医院实施临床路径效果评价

Xin-zhi Yue, R. Zhou, Tianwen Chen, C. Pu, Yuping Wu
{"title":"深圳市某三甲医院实施临床路径效果评价","authors":"Xin-zhi Yue, R. Zhou, Tianwen Chen, C. Pu, Yuping Wu","doi":"10.3109/23256176.2014.992174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractObjective. To evaluate the clinical effects of implementing the clinical pathway management method. Methods. Comparing and evaluating the indexes of average hospitalization expense, average length of stay, preoperative average length of stay, and patient satisfaction, in two groups. One included 5268 cases of clinical pathway management for five diseases (clinical pathway group), and the other group included 5895 cases not treated under clinical pathway management (traditional group), from May 2010 to May 2013 in the hospital. Results. The differences in the average hospitalization expense and medicine expense of patients with nodular goiter, between the clinical pathway group and the traditional group, were not statistically significant (P > 0.05), but the auxiliary examination expense in the clinical pathway group was significantly decreased (P < 0.001); the differences in the average auxiliary examination expense for patients with simple appendicitis between the two groups were not statisticall...","PeriodicalId":163748,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Medical Record English Edition","volume":"160 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Effect of Implementation of Clinical Pathway in a 3A Hospital in Shenzhen\",\"authors\":\"Xin-zhi Yue, R. Zhou, Tianwen Chen, C. Pu, Yuping Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/23256176.2014.992174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractObjective. To evaluate the clinical effects of implementing the clinical pathway management method. Methods. Comparing and evaluating the indexes of average hospitalization expense, average length of stay, preoperative average length of stay, and patient satisfaction, in two groups. One included 5268 cases of clinical pathway management for five diseases (clinical pathway group), and the other group included 5895 cases not treated under clinical pathway management (traditional group), from May 2010 to May 2013 in the hospital. Results. The differences in the average hospitalization expense and medicine expense of patients with nodular goiter, between the clinical pathway group and the traditional group, were not statistically significant (P > 0.05), but the auxiliary examination expense in the clinical pathway group was significantly decreased (P < 0.001); the differences in the average auxiliary examination expense for patients with simple appendicitis between the two groups were not statisticall...\",\"PeriodicalId\":163748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Medical Record English Edition\",\"volume\":\"160 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Medical Record English Edition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/23256176.2014.992174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Medical Record English Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/23256176.2014.992174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

AbstractObjective。评价实施临床路径管理方法的临床效果。方法。比较和评价两组患者的平均住院费用、平均住院时间、术前平均住院时间、患者满意度等指标。其中一组为2010年5月至2013年5月该院5种疾病临床路径管理5268例(临床路径组),另一组为未按临床路径管理治疗的5895例(传统组)。结果。结节性甲状腺肿患者的平均住院费用和药费与传统组比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),但辅助检查费用显著降低(P < 0.001);两组单纯性阑尾炎患者的平均辅助检查费用差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the Effect of Implementation of Clinical Pathway in a 3A Hospital in Shenzhen
AbstractObjective. To evaluate the clinical effects of implementing the clinical pathway management method. Methods. Comparing and evaluating the indexes of average hospitalization expense, average length of stay, preoperative average length of stay, and patient satisfaction, in two groups. One included 5268 cases of clinical pathway management for five diseases (clinical pathway group), and the other group included 5895 cases not treated under clinical pathway management (traditional group), from May 2010 to May 2013 in the hospital. Results. The differences in the average hospitalization expense and medicine expense of patients with nodular goiter, between the clinical pathway group and the traditional group, were not statistically significant (P > 0.05), but the auxiliary examination expense in the clinical pathway group was significantly decreased (P < 0.001); the differences in the average auxiliary examination expense for patients with simple appendicitis between the two groups were not statisticall...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Discussion on the Method of Classifi cation of Medical Syndromes in the ICD-10 Evaluation of the Effect of Implementation of Clinical Pathway in a 3A Hospital in Shenzhen Error Analysis and Discussion on ICD-9-CM-3 Coding of 216 Percutaneous Coronary Interventions A Discussion on ICD-10 Coding of Infantile Diarrheal Disease Predictive Analysis of Outpatient Volumes of a First-class Grade A General Hospital through ARIMA Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1