闹鬼档案:波黑冲突视听记录中的存在与缺失

Lennaart Van Oldenborgh
{"title":"闹鬼档案:波黑冲突视听记录中的存在与缺失","authors":"Lennaart Van Oldenborgh","doi":"10.15664/fcj.v19i0.2385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the potential consequences of the loss of raw rushes of historical events on collective memory. It examines two sets of rushes from 21 August 1993 that survived against the odds, of the arrival of the first humanitarian aid convoy in the besieged enclave of east Mostar, Bosnia-Herzegovina. These rushes were compared with edited accounts and examined for elements that, in the words of Dai Vaughan, could generate “meanings oblique, peripheral or even antagonistic to the text as understood.”  \nAccording to a well-worn maxim, “journalism is the first rough draft of history”. This is certainly true for audio-visual media: typically, archives preserve edited, “finished” films, and rushes often get lost from the record. This highlights a sometimes overlooked form of exclusion from the archive: the selection of footage in the editing room. In commercial news archives economic pressures determine which footage will be digitised, and a diminishing pool of well-known images tend to be re-used in a “feedback loop of historical footage”.  \nExamining the rushes of the aid convoy to Mostar reveals how much the news coverage is coloured by the media spectacle accompanying the convoy. The clear emphasis on the humanitarian aspects of the story downplays the political stakes of the warring parties, and incongruous jokes to the camera provide unexpected glimpses of the pressures and the privileges of the international journalists and aid workers producing the images. These are insights that could only have been gleaned from the raw rushes of the situation, and are an indication of the kind of insights into comparable events that may have been “narrativised” out of the historical record, and lost on the cutting room floor. ","PeriodicalId":423883,"journal":{"name":"Frames Cinema Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Haunted Archives: Presence and Absence in the Audio-visual Record of Conflict in Bosnia-Herzegovina\",\"authors\":\"Lennaart Van Oldenborgh\",\"doi\":\"10.15664/fcj.v19i0.2385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the potential consequences of the loss of raw rushes of historical events on collective memory. It examines two sets of rushes from 21 August 1993 that survived against the odds, of the arrival of the first humanitarian aid convoy in the besieged enclave of east Mostar, Bosnia-Herzegovina. These rushes were compared with edited accounts and examined for elements that, in the words of Dai Vaughan, could generate “meanings oblique, peripheral or even antagonistic to the text as understood.”  \\nAccording to a well-worn maxim, “journalism is the first rough draft of history”. This is certainly true for audio-visual media: typically, archives preserve edited, “finished” films, and rushes often get lost from the record. This highlights a sometimes overlooked form of exclusion from the archive: the selection of footage in the editing room. In commercial news archives economic pressures determine which footage will be digitised, and a diminishing pool of well-known images tend to be re-used in a “feedback loop of historical footage”.  \\nExamining the rushes of the aid convoy to Mostar reveals how much the news coverage is coloured by the media spectacle accompanying the convoy. The clear emphasis on the humanitarian aspects of the story downplays the political stakes of the warring parties, and incongruous jokes to the camera provide unexpected glimpses of the pressures and the privileges of the international journalists and aid workers producing the images. These are insights that could only have been gleaned from the raw rushes of the situation, and are an indication of the kind of insights into comparable events that may have been “narrativised” out of the historical record, and lost on the cutting room floor. \",\"PeriodicalId\":423883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frames Cinema Journal\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frames Cinema Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15664/fcj.v19i0.2385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frames Cinema Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15664/fcj.v19i0.2385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了历史事件原始片断的丢失对集体记忆的潜在影响。报告审查了1993年8月21日在第一批人道主义援助车队抵达波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那东莫斯塔尔被围困飞地的困难下幸存下来的两组紧急救援。这些草稿与编辑过的报告进行了比较,并用戴沃恩的话说,对那些可能产生“与理解的文本相倾斜、次要甚至对立的意义”的元素进行了检查。有句老话说得好:“新闻是历史的初稿”。对于视听媒体来说,这当然是正确的:通常,档案馆保存的是编辑过的、“完成”的电影,而匆忙拍摄的电影往往会从记录中消失。这凸显了一种有时被忽视的从档案中排除的形式:在编辑室中选择镜头。在商业新闻档案中,经济压力决定了哪些片段将被数字化,而越来越少的知名图像往往会在“历史片段的反馈循环”中被重复使用。考察前往莫斯塔尔的救援车队,我们就会发现,新闻报道在多大程度上被护送车队的媒体场面所影响。影片明确强调了故事的人道主义方面,淡化了交战各方的政治利害关系,对着镜头开着不协调的玩笑,让人意外地瞥见了拍摄这些照片的国际记者和援助工作者的压力和特权。这些见解只能从原始的形势中收集到,并且是对类似事件的见解的一种指示,这些事件可能已经从历史记录中“叙述”出来,并且在剪辑室的地板上丢失了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Haunted Archives: Presence and Absence in the Audio-visual Record of Conflict in Bosnia-Herzegovina
This paper examines the potential consequences of the loss of raw rushes of historical events on collective memory. It examines two sets of rushes from 21 August 1993 that survived against the odds, of the arrival of the first humanitarian aid convoy in the besieged enclave of east Mostar, Bosnia-Herzegovina. These rushes were compared with edited accounts and examined for elements that, in the words of Dai Vaughan, could generate “meanings oblique, peripheral or even antagonistic to the text as understood.”  According to a well-worn maxim, “journalism is the first rough draft of history”. This is certainly true for audio-visual media: typically, archives preserve edited, “finished” films, and rushes often get lost from the record. This highlights a sometimes overlooked form of exclusion from the archive: the selection of footage in the editing room. In commercial news archives economic pressures determine which footage will be digitised, and a diminishing pool of well-known images tend to be re-used in a “feedback loop of historical footage”.  Examining the rushes of the aid convoy to Mostar reveals how much the news coverage is coloured by the media spectacle accompanying the convoy. The clear emphasis on the humanitarian aspects of the story downplays the political stakes of the warring parties, and incongruous jokes to the camera provide unexpected glimpses of the pressures and the privileges of the international journalists and aid workers producing the images. These are insights that could only have been gleaned from the raw rushes of the situation, and are an indication of the kind of insights into comparable events that may have been “narrativised” out of the historical record, and lost on the cutting room floor. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Queer Monster: Putting Séance and Bit in Conversation Butch Orientations: Locating Queerness in Daryl Dixon from The Walking Dead I’m a Cyborg, But That’s OK: The Boundary Blurring Work of Lynn Hershman Leeson Letter from the Editors ‘Text-Praxis’ and Modes of Production: Harun Farocki’s Collected Writing Between 1964 and 2000
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1