论民主与专制之间的自由

Hamza Memišević
{"title":"论民主与专制之间的自由","authors":"Hamza Memišević","doi":"10.53028/1986-6127.2021.12.2.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transitioning from one system to another might be difficult for one country. That happened with Serbia, which proved that the process of transition and adaptation to liberal values could exhaust the country. In this paper, the author examines political rights, the election process, civil liberties, and the status of the media and civil society during Milosevic's reign and in the post-Milosevic era. The author argues that Serbia has not developed democracy in full capacity yet and that Serbia is an example of semi-consolidated democracy. In this text, the author uses quantitative and, qualitative criteria to examine the situation of democracy in Serbia during the Milosevic era, and in the post-Milosevic era. The main focus was on civil liberties, political rights, media freedom, and civil society. To examine these things, we used primary and secondary sources. The author analyzed the period from 1994 up to 2018/19. The paper structure is the following. In the first part, the author gives basic information about the country's history. The second section outlines political rights, civil liberties, and elections. In the third section, the author examines media freedom and civil society with a focus on the Milosevic era and the post-Milosevic era. In the conclusion section, the author sums up and briefly emphasizes the paper’s main findings.","PeriodicalId":296646,"journal":{"name":"Uprava","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Views on Freedoms Between Democracy and Authoritarianism\",\"authors\":\"Hamza Memišević\",\"doi\":\"10.53028/1986-6127.2021.12.2.125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Transitioning from one system to another might be difficult for one country. That happened with Serbia, which proved that the process of transition and adaptation to liberal values could exhaust the country. In this paper, the author examines political rights, the election process, civil liberties, and the status of the media and civil society during Milosevic's reign and in the post-Milosevic era. The author argues that Serbia has not developed democracy in full capacity yet and that Serbia is an example of semi-consolidated democracy. In this text, the author uses quantitative and, qualitative criteria to examine the situation of democracy in Serbia during the Milosevic era, and in the post-Milosevic era. The main focus was on civil liberties, political rights, media freedom, and civil society. To examine these things, we used primary and secondary sources. The author analyzed the period from 1994 up to 2018/19. The paper structure is the following. In the first part, the author gives basic information about the country's history. The second section outlines political rights, civil liberties, and elections. In the third section, the author examines media freedom and civil society with a focus on the Milosevic era and the post-Milosevic era. In the conclusion section, the author sums up and briefly emphasizes the paper’s main findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Uprava\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Uprava\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53028/1986-6127.2021.12.2.125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uprava","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53028/1986-6127.2021.12.2.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从一种制度过渡到另一种制度对一个国家来说可能是困难的。这种情况发生在塞尔维亚,它证明了过渡和适应自由价值观的过程可能会耗尽这个国家的力量。在本文中,作者考察了政治权利、选举过程、公民自由以及媒体和公民社会在米洛舍维奇统治时期和后米洛舍维奇时代的地位。发件人认为,塞尔维亚尚未充分发展民主,塞尔维亚是半巩固民主的一个例子。在本文中,作者使用定量和定性标准来考察米洛舍维奇时代和后米洛舍维奇时代塞尔维亚的民主状况。主要焦点是公民自由、政治权利、媒体自由和公民社会。为了检验这些东西,我们使用了第一手资料和第二手资料。作者分析了从1994年到2018/19年这段时间。论文结构如下。在第一部分中,作者给出了关于这个国家历史的基本信息。第二部分概述了政治权利、公民自由和选举。在第三部分,作者考察了媒体自由和公民社会,重点是米洛舍维奇时代和后米洛舍维奇时代。在结论部分,作者对本文的主要发现进行了总结和简要强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Views on Freedoms Between Democracy and Authoritarianism
Transitioning from one system to another might be difficult for one country. That happened with Serbia, which proved that the process of transition and adaptation to liberal values could exhaust the country. In this paper, the author examines political rights, the election process, civil liberties, and the status of the media and civil society during Milosevic's reign and in the post-Milosevic era. The author argues that Serbia has not developed democracy in full capacity yet and that Serbia is an example of semi-consolidated democracy. In this text, the author uses quantitative and, qualitative criteria to examine the situation of democracy in Serbia during the Milosevic era, and in the post-Milosevic era. The main focus was on civil liberties, political rights, media freedom, and civil society. To examine these things, we used primary and secondary sources. The author analyzed the period from 1994 up to 2018/19. The paper structure is the following. In the first part, the author gives basic information about the country's history. The second section outlines political rights, civil liberties, and elections. In the third section, the author examines media freedom and civil society with a focus on the Milosevic era and the post-Milosevic era. In the conclusion section, the author sums up and briefly emphasizes the paper’s main findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Administrative Dispute Within the Full Jurisdiction in Bosnia and Herzegovina - The Need and Significance Personal Health Data and the Significance of Its Administrative Protection The Reform Process of Introducing the Licensing of Primary and Secondary School Principals Sarajevo – Potential and Limitations in the Development of the City and Region Specificity of Non-tax Revenues of the State With Reference to Bosnia and Herzegovina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1