{"title":"印度尼西亚清算的BAITUL MAAL WA TAMWIL (BMT)的法律保护","authors":"Syafi’atul Mir’ah Ma’shum","doi":"10.14421/al-mazaahib.v5i1.1396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Baitul Maal wa Tamwil (BMT) is one type of micro finance institution that uses sharia principles. The BMT contributes to a real small economic by providing financing and channeling of funds. But the problem arises when liquidation occurs on the BMT, which rules should be used as a rule to solve it. This paper discusses the legal protection for BMT customers who are liquidated in Indonesia. The aim is to explain how legal protection forms for customers and why this legal protection is necessary for customers. The analysis used is statute approach and a conceptual approach. The legal basis of protection for BMT customers is Law no. 1 of 2013 on Microfinance Institutions (LKM), particularly articles 24 and 25, which regulate the prevention of disputes or revocation of licenses. Article 26 states that the Financial Services Authority (OJK) provides a deposit service if it makes them lose. But if BMT incorporated in the form of cooperative (koperasi) the law that use as basis is Law No. 25 of 1992, especially article 54 on the settlement. Differences in this rule become one of the factors slow the settlement of the problem of BMT customers that liquidated. The government should provide clear rules regarding the institutional status of BMT, so that the settlement of client's legal protection becomes clear","PeriodicalId":375931,"journal":{"name":"Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI NASABAH BAITUL MAAL WA TAMWIL (BMT) YANG DILIKUIDASI DI INDONESIA\",\"authors\":\"Syafi’atul Mir’ah Ma’shum\",\"doi\":\"10.14421/al-mazaahib.v5i1.1396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Baitul Maal wa Tamwil (BMT) is one type of micro finance institution that uses sharia principles. The BMT contributes to a real small economic by providing financing and channeling of funds. But the problem arises when liquidation occurs on the BMT, which rules should be used as a rule to solve it. This paper discusses the legal protection for BMT customers who are liquidated in Indonesia. The aim is to explain how legal protection forms for customers and why this legal protection is necessary for customers. The analysis used is statute approach and a conceptual approach. The legal basis of protection for BMT customers is Law no. 1 of 2013 on Microfinance Institutions (LKM), particularly articles 24 and 25, which regulate the prevention of disputes or revocation of licenses. Article 26 states that the Financial Services Authority (OJK) provides a deposit service if it makes them lose. But if BMT incorporated in the form of cooperative (koperasi) the law that use as basis is Law No. 25 of 1992, especially article 54 on the settlement. Differences in this rule become one of the factors slow the settlement of the problem of BMT customers that liquidated. The government should provide clear rules regarding the institutional status of BMT, so that the settlement of client's legal protection becomes clear\",\"PeriodicalId\":375931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v5i1.1396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v5i1.1396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Baitul Maal wa Tamwil (BMT)是一种使用伊斯兰教法原则的微型金融机构。BMT通过提供融资和资金渠道,为一个真正的小型经济体做出了贡献。但是当BMT发生平仓时,就会出现问题,应该用哪些规则作为规则来解决这个问题。本文讨论了在印尼清算BMT客户的法律保护问题。目的是解释法律保护是如何对客户形成的,以及为什么这种法律保护对客户是必要的。所使用的分析是法规方法和概念方法。BMT客户保护的法律依据是《中华人民共和国法律》。2013年关于小额信贷机构(LKM)的第1号法令,特别是第24条和第25条,其中规定了防止争议或撤销许可证。第26条规定,金融服务管理局(OJK)提供存款服务,如果它使他们损失。但是,如果BMT以合作社(koperasi)的形式成立,作为依据的法律是1992年第25号法,特别是关于结算的第54条。这一规则的差异成为BMT客户清算问题解决缓慢的因素之一。政府应明确BMT的制度地位,使客户法律保护的解决变得清晰
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI NASABAH BAITUL MAAL WA TAMWIL (BMT) YANG DILIKUIDASI DI INDONESIA
Baitul Maal wa Tamwil (BMT) is one type of micro finance institution that uses sharia principles. The BMT contributes to a real small economic by providing financing and channeling of funds. But the problem arises when liquidation occurs on the BMT, which rules should be used as a rule to solve it. This paper discusses the legal protection for BMT customers who are liquidated in Indonesia. The aim is to explain how legal protection forms for customers and why this legal protection is necessary for customers. The analysis used is statute approach and a conceptual approach. The legal basis of protection for BMT customers is Law no. 1 of 2013 on Microfinance Institutions (LKM), particularly articles 24 and 25, which regulate the prevention of disputes or revocation of licenses. Article 26 states that the Financial Services Authority (OJK) provides a deposit service if it makes them lose. But if BMT incorporated in the form of cooperative (koperasi) the law that use as basis is Law No. 25 of 1992, especially article 54 on the settlement. Differences in this rule become one of the factors slow the settlement of the problem of BMT customers that liquidated. The government should provide clear rules regarding the institutional status of BMT, so that the settlement of client's legal protection becomes clear