基于个人实践分段程序聚类的软件开发工作量估算模糊逻辑系统

C. López-Martín, C. Yáñez-Márquez, A. Gutiérrez-Tornés
{"title":"基于个人实践分段程序聚类的软件开发工作量估算模糊逻辑系统","authors":"C. López-Martín, C. Yáñez-Márquez, A. Gutiérrez-Tornés","doi":"10.1109/CERMA.2006.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most common application of software metrics is to develop models that predict the effort that will be required to complete certain stages of a software development. There are two main stages for using an estimation model (1) it must be determined whether the model is adequate to describe the observed (actual) data, that is, the model adequacy checking; if it resulted adequate then (2) the estimation model is validated in its environment using new data. In this paper, an investigation aimed to compare personal fuzzy logic systems (FLS) with linear regression is presented. The evaluation criteria is based upon ANOVA of MRE and MER, as well as MURE, MMER and pred(25). Ninety-nine programs were developed by eighteen programmers. From these programs four FLS are generated for estimating the effort of sixty programs developed by a group of ten developers. Results show that a FLS can be used as an alternative for estimating the development effort at personal level","PeriodicalId":179210,"journal":{"name":"Electronics, Robotics and Automotive Mechanics Conference (CERMA'06)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fuzzy Logic Systems for Software Development Effort Estimation Based Upon Clustering of Programs Segmented by Personal Practices\",\"authors\":\"C. López-Martín, C. Yáñez-Márquez, A. Gutiérrez-Tornés\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CERMA.2006.114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The most common application of software metrics is to develop models that predict the effort that will be required to complete certain stages of a software development. There are two main stages for using an estimation model (1) it must be determined whether the model is adequate to describe the observed (actual) data, that is, the model adequacy checking; if it resulted adequate then (2) the estimation model is validated in its environment using new data. In this paper, an investigation aimed to compare personal fuzzy logic systems (FLS) with linear regression is presented. The evaluation criteria is based upon ANOVA of MRE and MER, as well as MURE, MMER and pred(25). Ninety-nine programs were developed by eighteen programmers. From these programs four FLS are generated for estimating the effort of sixty programs developed by a group of ten developers. Results show that a FLS can be used as an alternative for estimating the development effort at personal level\",\"PeriodicalId\":179210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronics, Robotics and Automotive Mechanics Conference (CERMA'06)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronics, Robotics and Automotive Mechanics Conference (CERMA'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CERMA.2006.114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronics, Robotics and Automotive Mechanics Conference (CERMA'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CERMA.2006.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

软件度量最常见的应用是开发预测完成软件开发的特定阶段所需的工作量的模型。使用估计模型主要有两个阶段:(1)必须确定模型是否足以描述观测到的(实际)数据,即模型充分性检查;如果结果足够,则(2)在其环境中使用新数据验证估计模型。本文对个人模糊逻辑系统(FLS)与线性回归进行了比较研究。评价标准基于MRE和MER,以及MURE、MMER和pred的方差分析(25)。十八个程序员开发了九十九个程序。从这些程序中生成4个FLS,用于评估由10个开发人员组成的小组开发的60个程序的工作量。结果表明,FLS可以作为评估个人开发工作的替代方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fuzzy Logic Systems for Software Development Effort Estimation Based Upon Clustering of Programs Segmented by Personal Practices
The most common application of software metrics is to develop models that predict the effort that will be required to complete certain stages of a software development. There are two main stages for using an estimation model (1) it must be determined whether the model is adequate to describe the observed (actual) data, that is, the model adequacy checking; if it resulted adequate then (2) the estimation model is validated in its environment using new data. In this paper, an investigation aimed to compare personal fuzzy logic systems (FLS) with linear regression is presented. The evaluation criteria is based upon ANOVA of MRE and MER, as well as MURE, MMER and pred(25). Ninety-nine programs were developed by eighteen programmers. From these programs four FLS are generated for estimating the effort of sixty programs developed by a group of ten developers. Results show that a FLS can be used as an alternative for estimating the development effort at personal level
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Electrical Characterization of Thin Films Using Measurements of Electrical Resistivity Modelling of Nonlinear Systems Based on Fuzzy Clustering and Cubic Splines New Fast and Robust Stochastic Algorithm of Two Stage Vector Quantization for Joint Source-Channel Speech Coding for Any Transmission Channel Fuzzy Logic Systems for Software Development Effort Estimation Based Upon Clustering of Programs Segmented by Personal Practices Patents in Telecommunications Standards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1