基于长短期记忆和统计方法的停车场占用率预测

Yusuf Can Anar, E. Avşar, Abdurrahman Özgür Polat
{"title":"基于长短期记忆和统计方法的停车场占用率预测","authors":"Yusuf Can Anar, E. Avşar, Abdurrahman Özgür Polat","doi":"10.51354/mjen.986631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In crowded city centers, drivers looking for available parking space generate extra traffic and in addition, the resulting excessive exhaust gases cause air pollution. Therefore, directing the drivers to a parking spot in an intelligent way is an important task for smart city applications. This task requires the prediction of occupancy states of parking lots which involves appropriate processing of the historical parking data. In this work, Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) methods were applied to parking data collected from curbside parking spots of Adana, Turkey for predicting the parking lot occupancy rates of future values. The experiments were performed for making predictions with different prediction horizons that are 1 minute, 5 minutes, and 15 minutes. The performances of the methods were compared by calculating root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) values. The experiments were performed on data from five different days. According to the results, when the prediction horizon is set to 1 minute, LSTM achieved RMSE and MAE values of 0.98 and 0.72, respectively. For the same prediction horizon, ARIMA achieved RMSE and MAE values of 0.62 and 0.35, respectively. On the other hand, LSTM achieved smaller error values for larger prediction horizons. In conclusion, it was shown that LSTM is more suitable for larger prediction horizons, however, ARIMA is better at predicting near-future values.","PeriodicalId":102219,"journal":{"name":"MANAS Journal of Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parking Lot Occupancy Prediction Using Long Short-Term Memory and Statistical Methods\",\"authors\":\"Yusuf Can Anar, E. Avşar, Abdurrahman Özgür Polat\",\"doi\":\"10.51354/mjen.986631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In crowded city centers, drivers looking for available parking space generate extra traffic and in addition, the resulting excessive exhaust gases cause air pollution. Therefore, directing the drivers to a parking spot in an intelligent way is an important task for smart city applications. This task requires the prediction of occupancy states of parking lots which involves appropriate processing of the historical parking data. In this work, Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) methods were applied to parking data collected from curbside parking spots of Adana, Turkey for predicting the parking lot occupancy rates of future values. The experiments were performed for making predictions with different prediction horizons that are 1 minute, 5 minutes, and 15 minutes. The performances of the methods were compared by calculating root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) values. The experiments were performed on data from five different days. According to the results, when the prediction horizon is set to 1 minute, LSTM achieved RMSE and MAE values of 0.98 and 0.72, respectively. For the same prediction horizon, ARIMA achieved RMSE and MAE values of 0.62 and 0.35, respectively. On the other hand, LSTM achieved smaller error values for larger prediction horizons. In conclusion, it was shown that LSTM is more suitable for larger prediction horizons, however, ARIMA is better at predicting near-future values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":102219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MANAS Journal of Engineering\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MANAS Journal of Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51354/mjen.986631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MANAS Journal of Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51354/mjen.986631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在拥挤的城市中心,司机寻找可用的停车位造成额外的交通,此外,由此产生的过量废气造成空气污染。因此,如何以智能的方式引导司机到停车位是智慧城市应用的重要任务。该任务要求预测停车场的占用状态,这涉及到对历史停车数据的适当处理。本研究采用长短期记忆(LSTM)和自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)方法对土耳其Adana市路边停车场的停车数据进行分析,预测未来车位入住率。实验采用1分钟、5分钟和15分钟的不同预测期限进行预测。通过计算均方根误差(RMSE)和平均绝对误差(MAE),比较了各方法的性能。实验是根据5天的数据进行的。结果表明,当预测时段设置为1分钟时,LSTM的RMSE和MAE值分别为0.98和0.72。对于相同的预测水平,ARIMA的RMSE和MAE值分别为0.62和0.35。另一方面,LSTM在更大的预测范围内获得了更小的误差值。综上所述,LSTM更适合于更大的预测范围,而ARIMA更适合于近未来值的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Parking Lot Occupancy Prediction Using Long Short-Term Memory and Statistical Methods
In crowded city centers, drivers looking for available parking space generate extra traffic and in addition, the resulting excessive exhaust gases cause air pollution. Therefore, directing the drivers to a parking spot in an intelligent way is an important task for smart city applications. This task requires the prediction of occupancy states of parking lots which involves appropriate processing of the historical parking data. In this work, Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) methods were applied to parking data collected from curbside parking spots of Adana, Turkey for predicting the parking lot occupancy rates of future values. The experiments were performed for making predictions with different prediction horizons that are 1 minute, 5 minutes, and 15 minutes. The performances of the methods were compared by calculating root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) values. The experiments were performed on data from five different days. According to the results, when the prediction horizon is set to 1 minute, LSTM achieved RMSE and MAE values of 0.98 and 0.72, respectively. For the same prediction horizon, ARIMA achieved RMSE and MAE values of 0.62 and 0.35, respectively. On the other hand, LSTM achieved smaller error values for larger prediction horizons. In conclusion, it was shown that LSTM is more suitable for larger prediction horizons, however, ARIMA is better at predicting near-future values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation and Optimization of The Effect of Anhydrous Borax Mineral on The Vickers Hardness and Indentation Modulus Values of Iron Material A Systematic Survey of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models Used in Industrial Internet of Things Security Polynomial Solutions of Electric Field Equations in Anisotropic Media Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) Detection via electrochemical Biosensing Tools ON APPROXIMATING FIXED POINTS OF A NEW CLASS OF GENERALIZED NONEXPANSIVE MAPPINGS IN UNIFORMLY CONVEX HYPERBOLIC SPACE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1