从后苏联非殖民化的视角看乌克兰冲突

B. Kang
{"title":"从后苏联非殖民化的视角看乌克兰冲突","authors":"B. Kang","doi":"10.1353/REG.2020.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article aims to explain the causes (in particular, the motives and objectives of Russia's actions) of the Ukrainian conflict from a decolonization perspective and its impact on Eurasian interstate and West-Russia relations. Russia's positioning in Eurasian decolonization is identified as \"defensive.\" This defensive position as a postimperial metropole has been constructed by combining its \"semiperipheral\" status within the liberal international order with the assertiveness of a \"neocolonial\" power challenged by \"post-colonial\" independent countries in Eurasia. To a certain extent, the annexation of Crimea was merely an illegitimate settlement of disputes over property rights between two countries, in that the seizure of Crimea occurred in a combination of several factors at various levels. As a result, the motives and objectives of a Russian invasion can be regarded as neither a challenge to the whole post–Cold War European order nor irredentism to reclaim the territory of the Soviet empire. Consequently, post-Crimea development could herald the closing stage of the historical period called the post-Soviet era as the period of Eurasian decolonization.","PeriodicalId":307724,"journal":{"name":"Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Ukrainian Conflict from the Perspective of Post-Soviet Decolonization\",\"authors\":\"B. Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/REG.2020.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article aims to explain the causes (in particular, the motives and objectives of Russia's actions) of the Ukrainian conflict from a decolonization perspective and its impact on Eurasian interstate and West-Russia relations. Russia's positioning in Eurasian decolonization is identified as \\\"defensive.\\\" This defensive position as a postimperial metropole has been constructed by combining its \\\"semiperipheral\\\" status within the liberal international order with the assertiveness of a \\\"neocolonial\\\" power challenged by \\\"post-colonial\\\" independent countries in Eurasia. To a certain extent, the annexation of Crimea was merely an illegitimate settlement of disputes over property rights between two countries, in that the seizure of Crimea occurred in a combination of several factors at various levels. As a result, the motives and objectives of a Russian invasion can be regarded as neither a challenge to the whole post–Cold War European order nor irredentism to reclaim the territory of the Soviet empire. Consequently, post-Crimea development could herald the closing stage of the historical period called the post-Soviet era as the period of Eurasian decolonization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":307724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/REG.2020.0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/REG.2020.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文旨在从非殖民化的角度分析乌克兰冲突的起因(特别是俄罗斯行动的动机和目的)及其对欧亚国家间和西俄关系的影响。俄罗斯在欧亚非殖民化中的定位被认为是“防御性的”。这种作为后帝国主义大都市的防御地位是通过将其在自由主义国际秩序中的“半外围”地位与欧亚大陆“后殖民”独立国家所挑战的“新殖民”大国的自信相结合而建立起来的。在某种程度上,克里米亚的吞并仅仅是两国之间产权纠纷的一种非法解决,因为克里米亚的吞并是多种因素在不同层面上共同作用的结果。因此,俄罗斯入侵的动机和目标既不能被视为对整个冷战后欧洲秩序的挑战,也不能被视为收复苏联帝国领土的民族统一主义。因此,后克里米亚的发展可能预示着被称为后苏联时代的历史时期的结束阶段,即欧亚非殖民化时期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the Ukrainian Conflict from the Perspective of Post-Soviet Decolonization
Abstract:This article aims to explain the causes (in particular, the motives and objectives of Russia's actions) of the Ukrainian conflict from a decolonization perspective and its impact on Eurasian interstate and West-Russia relations. Russia's positioning in Eurasian decolonization is identified as "defensive." This defensive position as a postimperial metropole has been constructed by combining its "semiperipheral" status within the liberal international order with the assertiveness of a "neocolonial" power challenged by "post-colonial" independent countries in Eurasia. To a certain extent, the annexation of Crimea was merely an illegitimate settlement of disputes over property rights between two countries, in that the seizure of Crimea occurred in a combination of several factors at various levels. As a result, the motives and objectives of a Russian invasion can be regarded as neither a challenge to the whole post–Cold War European order nor irredentism to reclaim the territory of the Soviet empire. Consequently, post-Crimea development could herald the closing stage of the historical period called the post-Soviet era as the period of Eurasian decolonization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uzbek Migrants in Türkiye: Gender, Satisfaction in Türkiye, and Return Intentions On Arid Ground: Political Ecologies of Empire in Russian Central Asia by Jennifer Keating (review) Analyzing the Compatibility of the Remedial Right of Secession with Regard to the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Arrested Development: The Soviet Union in Ghana, Guinea, and Mali, 1955–1968 by Alessandro Iandolo (review) "Save the Children!": The Symbol of Childhood and (De)Legitimation of Power in Russian Protests, 2017–21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1