表达性工作场所原则:保护公共话语免受敌对工作环境行为的影响

Jonathan L. Segal
{"title":"表达性工作场所原则:保护公共话语免受敌对工作环境行为的影响","authors":"Jonathan L. Segal","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.975380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reviews the hostile work environment suits that have been filed in expressive workplaces: workplaces that create, distribute or facilitate expression that is protected by the First Amendment. It concludes that these cases pose a danger to the public discourse at large by chilling offensive speech dealing with race, sex, gender and religion. Next, it explains how the hostile work environment action violates the First Amendment when it is applied to expressive workplaces, noting how the action does not fall under any of the recognized exceptions to First Amendment protection. Finally, it proposes that expressive workplaces be given a limited exemption from hostile work environment suits, subject to reasonable accommodation.","PeriodicalId":199069,"journal":{"name":"SEIN Social Impacts of Business eJournal","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Expressive Workplace Doctrine: Protecting the Public Discourse from Hostile Work Environment Actions\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan L. Segal\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.975380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reviews the hostile work environment suits that have been filed in expressive workplaces: workplaces that create, distribute or facilitate expression that is protected by the First Amendment. It concludes that these cases pose a danger to the public discourse at large by chilling offensive speech dealing with race, sex, gender and religion. Next, it explains how the hostile work environment action violates the First Amendment when it is applied to expressive workplaces, noting how the action does not fall under any of the recognized exceptions to First Amendment protection. Finally, it proposes that expressive workplaces be given a limited exemption from hostile work environment suits, subject to reasonable accommodation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":199069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SEIN Social Impacts of Business eJournal\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SEIN Social Impacts of Business eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.975380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEIN Social Impacts of Business eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.975380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文回顾了在表达性工作场所提起的敌对工作环境诉讼:创造、传播或促进受第一修正案保护的表达的工作场所。它的结论是,这些案件通过令人不寒而栗的涉及种族、性别、性别和宗教的攻击性言论,对公共话语构成了威胁。接下来,它解释了敌对工作环境行为在适用于表达性工作场所时是如何违反第一修正案的,并指出该行为如何不属于第一修正案保护的任何公认例外。最后,它建议,在合理的便利条件下,有限度地豁免表达性工作场所对敌对工作环境的诉讼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Expressive Workplace Doctrine: Protecting the Public Discourse from Hostile Work Environment Actions
This paper reviews the hostile work environment suits that have been filed in expressive workplaces: workplaces that create, distribute or facilitate expression that is protected by the First Amendment. It concludes that these cases pose a danger to the public discourse at large by chilling offensive speech dealing with race, sex, gender and religion. Next, it explains how the hostile work environment action violates the First Amendment when it is applied to expressive workplaces, noting how the action does not fall under any of the recognized exceptions to First Amendment protection. Finally, it proposes that expressive workplaces be given a limited exemption from hostile work environment suits, subject to reasonable accommodation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Managerial Entrenchment and the Market for Talent SRI? I Don’t Buy it! (Because You’re Selling it Wrong) The 'Base of the Pyramid'-Concept: Integrative Business Models in Developing Countries (Das Konzept 'Base of the Pyramid': Integrative Geschäftsmodelle in Entwicklungsländern) How Firms Respond to Being Rated Wal-Mart and Values: Painting the Town Red?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1