护理本科学生及其教育工作者的批判性思维倾向:一项横断面分析研究

N. Sultana, R. Gul
{"title":"护理本科学生及其教育工作者的批判性思维倾向:一项横断面分析研究","authors":"N. Sultana, R. Gul","doi":"10.32593/jstmu/vol4.iss1.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Critical thinking is an imperative outcome of nursing education. However, several factors contribute to the development of critical being including critical thinking dispositions (CTDs). \nObjective: This study aimed to assess the critical thinking dispositions and factors affecting critical thinking dispositions of BScN students and their educators in twin city Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. \nMethodology: A cross- sectional analytical design was used in this study. A consecutive sample of 215 BScN students and 63 educators participated in the study. Data were collected via Pakistan-Critical Thinking Dispositions Scale (P-CTDS) comprising 54 items under the seven constructs; responses were measured on 5-points Likert scale. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 22. \nResults: The findings showed that 52% of the educators were at the developed level of CTDs and nearly 48% at the developing level; whereas 76% students were inclined towards CTD and only 23% were found at the developed level of CTDs. Although with considerable difference in the scores of the 7 constructs, both, students and educators obtained highest scores on inquisitiveness and contextual perspective. Similarly, students and educators obtained low score on open-mindedness. The difference between students and their teachers was statistically significant for the total scores of CTDs as well as for the scores of six of seven constructs. \nConclusion: Although educators exhibited stronger CTDs than their students, both have room for improvement, specifically their open mindedness. If educators are willing to challenge their personal assumptions, students will also emulate them.","PeriodicalId":302306,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical thinking dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students and their educators: A cross-sectional analytical study\",\"authors\":\"N. Sultana, R. Gul\",\"doi\":\"10.32593/jstmu/vol4.iss1.118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Critical thinking is an imperative outcome of nursing education. However, several factors contribute to the development of critical being including critical thinking dispositions (CTDs). \\nObjective: This study aimed to assess the critical thinking dispositions and factors affecting critical thinking dispositions of BScN students and their educators in twin city Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. \\nMethodology: A cross- sectional analytical design was used in this study. A consecutive sample of 215 BScN students and 63 educators participated in the study. Data were collected via Pakistan-Critical Thinking Dispositions Scale (P-CTDS) comprising 54 items under the seven constructs; responses were measured on 5-points Likert scale. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 22. \\nResults: The findings showed that 52% of the educators were at the developed level of CTDs and nearly 48% at the developing level; whereas 76% students were inclined towards CTD and only 23% were found at the developed level of CTDs. Although with considerable difference in the scores of the 7 constructs, both, students and educators obtained highest scores on inquisitiveness and contextual perspective. Similarly, students and educators obtained low score on open-mindedness. The difference between students and their teachers was statistically significant for the total scores of CTDs as well as for the scores of six of seven constructs. \\nConclusion: Although educators exhibited stronger CTDs than their students, both have room for improvement, specifically their open mindedness. If educators are willing to challenge their personal assumptions, students will also emulate them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32593/jstmu/vol4.iss1.118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32593/jstmu/vol4.iss1.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:批判性思维是护理教育的必然结果。然而,有几个因素有助于批判性存在的发展,包括批判性思维倾向(CTDs)。目的:本研究旨在评估巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第和伊斯兰堡双城BScN学生及其教育工作者的批判性思维倾向及其影响因素。方法:本研究采用横断面分析设计。215名BScN学生和63名教育工作者连续参加了这项研究。通过巴基斯坦批判性思维倾向量表(P-CTDS)收集数据,该量表包括七个构式下的54个项目;回答以5分李克特量表进行测量。数据采用SPSS version 22进行分析。结果:调查结果显示,52%的教育工作者处于CTDs的发达水平,近48%的教育工作者处于发展水平;而76%的学生倾向于持续发展,只有23%的学生达到持续发展水平。尽管7个构念的得分差异较大,但学生和教育工作者在探究性和情境视角上都获得了最高分。同样,学生和教育工作者在开放性方面得分较低。学生和教师在CTDs总分和七个构念中的六个构念得分上的差异有统计学意义。结论:尽管教育工作者表现出比学生更强的ctd,但他们都有改进的空间,特别是他们的开放思想。如果教育工作者愿意挑战他们的个人假设,学生也会效仿他们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Critical thinking dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students and their educators: A cross-sectional analytical study
Background: Critical thinking is an imperative outcome of nursing education. However, several factors contribute to the development of critical being including critical thinking dispositions (CTDs). Objective: This study aimed to assess the critical thinking dispositions and factors affecting critical thinking dispositions of BScN students and their educators in twin city Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. Methodology: A cross- sectional analytical design was used in this study. A consecutive sample of 215 BScN students and 63 educators participated in the study. Data were collected via Pakistan-Critical Thinking Dispositions Scale (P-CTDS) comprising 54 items under the seven constructs; responses were measured on 5-points Likert scale. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 22. Results: The findings showed that 52% of the educators were at the developed level of CTDs and nearly 48% at the developing level; whereas 76% students were inclined towards CTD and only 23% were found at the developed level of CTDs. Although with considerable difference in the scores of the 7 constructs, both, students and educators obtained highest scores on inquisitiveness and contextual perspective. Similarly, students and educators obtained low score on open-mindedness. The difference between students and their teachers was statistically significant for the total scores of CTDs as well as for the scores of six of seven constructs. Conclusion: Although educators exhibited stronger CTDs than their students, both have room for improvement, specifically their open mindedness. If educators are willing to challenge their personal assumptions, students will also emulate them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Upholding the responsible conduct of medical research in Pakistan: The buck stops where? The cardiovascular system's Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS). Hyper Immunoglobulin E (IgE); an immune deficiency (Job Syndrome) Neophyte baccalaureate nursing student’s perceptions of motivation towards clinical practice. A retrospective study on epidemiological and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in Baluchistan (Pakistan) and its future perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1