{"title":"白人统治的地方:秘密的强制仲裁制度如何伤害妇女和少数民族","authors":"Aaj Research","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3878360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arbitrators are mostly male and overwhelmingly white. Women and minorities are more likely than white men to be forced into arbitration, which prevents them from having judges and juries hear their cases. Corporate defendants disfavor female and minority arbitrators. When they do oversee cases, female arbitrators rule in favor of consumers and employees more often than male arbitrators.","PeriodicalId":108281,"journal":{"name":"Women & Law eJournal","volume":"258 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where White Men Rule: How the Secretive System of Forced Arbitration Hurts Women and Minorities\",\"authors\":\"Aaj Research\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3878360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Arbitrators are mostly male and overwhelmingly white. Women and minorities are more likely than white men to be forced into arbitration, which prevents them from having judges and juries hear their cases. Corporate defendants disfavor female and minority arbitrators. When they do oversee cases, female arbitrators rule in favor of consumers and employees more often than male arbitrators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women & Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"258 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women & Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3878360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women & Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3878360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Where White Men Rule: How the Secretive System of Forced Arbitration Hurts Women and Minorities
Arbitrators are mostly male and overwhelmingly white. Women and minorities are more likely than white men to be forced into arbitration, which prevents them from having judges and juries hear their cases. Corporate defendants disfavor female and minority arbitrators. When they do oversee cases, female arbitrators rule in favor of consumers and employees more often than male arbitrators.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
