估计胃肠道息肉分割的预测不确定性

Felicia Ly Jacobsen, S. Hicks, Pål Halvorsen, M. Riegler
{"title":"估计胃肠道息肉分割的预测不确定性","authors":"Felicia Ly Jacobsen, S. Hicks, Pål Halvorsen, M. Riegler","doi":"10.1109/CBMS55023.2022.00015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep neural networks have achieved state-of-the-art performance on numerous applications in the medical field, with use-cases ranging from automation of mundane tasks to diagnosis of life-threatening diseases. Despite these achievements, deep neural networks are considered “black boxes” due to their complex structure and general lack of transparency in their decision-making process. These attributes make it challenging to incorporate deep learning into existing clinical workflows as decisions often need more support than blind faith in a statistical model. This paper presents an investigation of uncertainty estimation for the detection of colon polyps using deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs). We experiment with two different approaches to measure uncertainty, Monte Carlo (MC) dropout and deep ensembles, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both methods in terms of computational efficiency and performance gain. Furthermore, we apply the two uncertainty methods to two different state-of-the-art CNN-based polyp segmentation architectures. The uncertainty is visualized as heatmaps on the input images and can be used to make more informed decisions on whether or not to trust a model's predictions. The results show that the predictive uncertainties provide a comparison between different models' predictions which can be interpreted as contrastive explanations where the values are largely influenced by the degree of independence between the models in the ensemble. We also reveal that MC dropout is shown to lack at providing contrastive uncertainty values due to the high correlation between the models' in the ensemble.","PeriodicalId":218475,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 35th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating Predictive Uncertainty in Gastrointestinal Polyp Segmentation\",\"authors\":\"Felicia Ly Jacobsen, S. Hicks, Pål Halvorsen, M. Riegler\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CBMS55023.2022.00015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Deep neural networks have achieved state-of-the-art performance on numerous applications in the medical field, with use-cases ranging from automation of mundane tasks to diagnosis of life-threatening diseases. Despite these achievements, deep neural networks are considered “black boxes” due to their complex structure and general lack of transparency in their decision-making process. These attributes make it challenging to incorporate deep learning into existing clinical workflows as decisions often need more support than blind faith in a statistical model. This paper presents an investigation of uncertainty estimation for the detection of colon polyps using deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs). We experiment with two different approaches to measure uncertainty, Monte Carlo (MC) dropout and deep ensembles, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both methods in terms of computational efficiency and performance gain. Furthermore, we apply the two uncertainty methods to two different state-of-the-art CNN-based polyp segmentation architectures. The uncertainty is visualized as heatmaps on the input images and can be used to make more informed decisions on whether or not to trust a model's predictions. The results show that the predictive uncertainties provide a comparison between different models' predictions which can be interpreted as contrastive explanations where the values are largely influenced by the degree of independence between the models in the ensemble. We also reveal that MC dropout is shown to lack at providing contrastive uncertainty values due to the high correlation between the models' in the ensemble.\",\"PeriodicalId\":218475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE 35th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE 35th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS55023.2022.00015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 35th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS55023.2022.00015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深度神经网络已经在医疗领域的许多应用中取得了最先进的性能,用例从日常任务的自动化到危及生命的疾病的诊断。尽管取得了这些成就,但由于其复杂的结构和决策过程普遍缺乏透明度,深度神经网络被认为是“黑盒子”。这些属性使得将深度学习纳入现有临床工作流程具有挑战性,因为决策通常需要更多的支持,而不是盲目相信统计模型。提出了一种基于深度卷积神经网络的结肠息肉检测的不确定性估计方法。我们实验了两种不同的测量不确定性的方法,蒙特卡罗(MC) dropout和深度集成,并讨论了两种方法在计算效率和性能增益方面的优缺点。此外,我们将两种不确定性方法应用于两种不同的最先进的基于cnn的息肉分割架构。不确定性以热图的形式显示在输入图像上,可以用来做出更明智的决定,决定是否相信模型的预测。结果表明,预测不确定性提供了不同模型预测之间的比较,这可以解释为对比解释,其中值在很大程度上受集合中模型之间的独立程度的影响。我们还发现,由于集合中模型之间的高度相关性,MC dropout在提供对比不确定性值方面表现不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating Predictive Uncertainty in Gastrointestinal Polyp Segmentation
Deep neural networks have achieved state-of-the-art performance on numerous applications in the medical field, with use-cases ranging from automation of mundane tasks to diagnosis of life-threatening diseases. Despite these achievements, deep neural networks are considered “black boxes” due to their complex structure and general lack of transparency in their decision-making process. These attributes make it challenging to incorporate deep learning into existing clinical workflows as decisions often need more support than blind faith in a statistical model. This paper presents an investigation of uncertainty estimation for the detection of colon polyps using deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs). We experiment with two different approaches to measure uncertainty, Monte Carlo (MC) dropout and deep ensembles, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both methods in terms of computational efficiency and performance gain. Furthermore, we apply the two uncertainty methods to two different state-of-the-art CNN-based polyp segmentation architectures. The uncertainty is visualized as heatmaps on the input images and can be used to make more informed decisions on whether or not to trust a model's predictions. The results show that the predictive uncertainties provide a comparison between different models' predictions which can be interpreted as contrastive explanations where the values are largely influenced by the degree of independence between the models in the ensemble. We also reveal that MC dropout is shown to lack at providing contrastive uncertainty values due to the high correlation between the models' in the ensemble.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ultrasonic Carotid Blood Flow Velocimetry Based on Deep Complex Neural Network Graph-based Regional Feature Enhancing for Abdominal Multi-Organ Segmentation in CT Exploiting AI to make insulin pens smart: injection site recognition and lipodystrophy detection Subgroup Discovery Analysis of Treatment Patterns in Lung Cancer Patients Estimating Predictive Uncertainty in Gastrointestinal Polyp Segmentation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1