作为修辞结构的界面:波士顿马拉松爆炸案期间的reddit和4chan

L. Potts, Angela Harrison
{"title":"作为修辞结构的界面:波士顿马拉松爆炸案期间的reddit和4chan","authors":"L. Potts, Angela Harrison","doi":"10.1145/2507065.2507079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we describe the rhetorical construction of two community sites and analyze how these sites support the information sharing practices of these communities. By examining activity on web-based discussion boards reddit and 4chan, we show how these spaces are developed and shaped over time by participants making rhetorical moves in order to share content within these ecologies. During the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings, we show how these spaces can be altered, disregarding the more typical practices on these sites. When community members embrace or reject these uses, it is as much a reaction to the content as it is to the cultural misuse of the community. In the case of reddit and 4hcan, this acceptance and rejection is especially true when the makers and maintainers of the system are participants themselves. Through this examination, we conclude that it is important to understand the rhetorical construction of these systems as reflections of the cultures they support.","PeriodicalId":447848,"journal":{"name":"ACM International Conference on Design of Communication","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"50","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interfaces as rhetorical constructions: reddit and 4chan during the boston marathon bombings\",\"authors\":\"L. Potts, Angela Harrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2507065.2507079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we describe the rhetorical construction of two community sites and analyze how these sites support the information sharing practices of these communities. By examining activity on web-based discussion boards reddit and 4chan, we show how these spaces are developed and shaped over time by participants making rhetorical moves in order to share content within these ecologies. During the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings, we show how these spaces can be altered, disregarding the more typical practices on these sites. When community members embrace or reject these uses, it is as much a reaction to the content as it is to the cultural misuse of the community. In the case of reddit and 4hcan, this acceptance and rejection is especially true when the makers and maintainers of the system are participants themselves. Through this examination, we conclude that it is important to understand the rhetorical construction of these systems as reflections of the cultures they support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM International Conference on Design of Communication\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"50\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM International Conference on Design of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2507065.2507079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM International Conference on Design of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2507065.2507079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

摘要

在本文中,我们描述了两个社区网站的修辞结构,并分析了这些网站如何支持这些社区的信息共享实践。通过研究基于网络的讨论板reddit和4chan上的活动,我们展示了这些空间是如何随着时间的推移而发展和塑造的,参与者为了在这些生态中分享内容而采取了修辞行动。在2013年波士顿马拉松爆炸案中,我们展示了这些空间是如何被改变的,而不考虑这些场地上更典型的做法。当社区成员接受或拒绝这些用途时,这既是对内容的反应,也是对社区文化滥用的反应。在reddit和4hcan的案例中,当系统的创造者和维护者本身就是参与者时,这种接受和拒绝尤其真实。通过这次考察,我们得出结论,将这些系统的修辞结构理解为它们所支持的文化的反映是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interfaces as rhetorical constructions: reddit and 4chan during the boston marathon bombings
In this paper, we describe the rhetorical construction of two community sites and analyze how these sites support the information sharing practices of these communities. By examining activity on web-based discussion boards reddit and 4chan, we show how these spaces are developed and shaped over time by participants making rhetorical moves in order to share content within these ecologies. During the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings, we show how these spaces can be altered, disregarding the more typical practices on these sites. When community members embrace or reject these uses, it is as much a reaction to the content as it is to the cultural misuse of the community. In the case of reddit and 4hcan, this acceptance and rejection is especially true when the makers and maintainers of the system are participants themselves. Through this examination, we conclude that it is important to understand the rhetorical construction of these systems as reflections of the cultures they support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social Justice and Entrepreneurial Identity: Models for the TPC Classroom Principles of Technical and Public Communication as a Provisional Framework for Undergraduate Students Writing with and About Indigenous Peoples Examining UX Design Principles and Older Adults' Preference of Online Appointment Scheduling Using a mHealth Application Migrants as Place-Makers: The Role of Technical Communicators in (re)Locating Place Understanding Patient Perception of Medical Artificial Intelligence: A Proposed Qualitative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1