美国电子期货和ETF市场的价格发现和流动性特征

A. Oztekin, Suchi Mishra, P. Jain, R. Daigler, Sascha Strobl, R. Holowczak
{"title":"美国电子期货和ETF市场的价格发现和流动性特征","authors":"A. Oztekin, Suchi Mishra, P. Jain, R. Daigler, Sascha Strobl, R. Holowczak","doi":"10.3905/jot.2017.12.2.059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using high-frequency datasets, we examine price discovery and its determinants for equivalent instruments across futures markets, electronically traded exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and spot markets. We compare futures to ETFs—leveraged and unleveraged—for stock indexes, using both a normal period and the 2008 financial crisis. Yan and Zivot’s information leadership procedure is employed to determine which instrument dominates price discovery. We then examine the determinants and characteristics of the price discovery process using Hasbrouck’s sequential trading model for the price impact of large trades. We find that most price discovery occurs in the more liquid and highly leveraged futures market. Although liquidity declined in all markets during the financial crisis, the relative contribution of ETFs to price discovery increased. We also find that the information leadership shares of futures and ETFs depend on the ratio of the quoted percentage spread between futures and ETFs and the aggregate volatility occurring in these markets.","PeriodicalId":254660,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Trading","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Price Discovery and Liquidity Characteristics for U.S. Electronic Futures and ETF Markets\",\"authors\":\"A. Oztekin, Suchi Mishra, P. Jain, R. Daigler, Sascha Strobl, R. Holowczak\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jot.2017.12.2.059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using high-frequency datasets, we examine price discovery and its determinants for equivalent instruments across futures markets, electronically traded exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and spot markets. We compare futures to ETFs—leveraged and unleveraged—for stock indexes, using both a normal period and the 2008 financial crisis. Yan and Zivot’s information leadership procedure is employed to determine which instrument dominates price discovery. We then examine the determinants and characteristics of the price discovery process using Hasbrouck’s sequential trading model for the price impact of large trades. We find that most price discovery occurs in the more liquid and highly leveraged futures market. Although liquidity declined in all markets during the financial crisis, the relative contribution of ETFs to price discovery increased. We also find that the information leadership shares of futures and ETFs depend on the ratio of the quoted percentage spread between futures and ETFs and the aggregate volatility occurring in these markets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Trading\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Trading\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jot.2017.12.2.059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Trading","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jot.2017.12.2.059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

使用高频数据集,我们研究了期货市场、电子交易交易所交易基金(etf)和现货市场等价工具的价格发现及其决定因素。我们以正常时期和2008年金融危机为例,比较了股指期货和etf(杠杆和非杠杆)。采用Yan和Zivot的信息领导程序来确定哪种工具在价格发现中占主导地位。然后,我们使用Hasbrouck的大型交易价格影响的顺序交易模型来检查价格发现过程的决定因素和特征。我们发现,大多数价格发现发生在流动性更强、杠杆率更高的期货市场。尽管在金融危机期间,所有市场的流动性都有所下降,但etf对价格发现的相对贡献却有所增加。我们还发现,期货和etf的信息领先份额取决于期货和etf之间的报价百分比差与这些市场发生的总波动率的比率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Price Discovery and Liquidity Characteristics for U.S. Electronic Futures and ETF Markets
Using high-frequency datasets, we examine price discovery and its determinants for equivalent instruments across futures markets, electronically traded exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and spot markets. We compare futures to ETFs—leveraged and unleveraged—for stock indexes, using both a normal period and the 2008 financial crisis. Yan and Zivot’s information leadership procedure is employed to determine which instrument dominates price discovery. We then examine the determinants and characteristics of the price discovery process using Hasbrouck’s sequential trading model for the price impact of large trades. We find that most price discovery occurs in the more liquid and highly leveraged futures market. Although liquidity declined in all markets during the financial crisis, the relative contribution of ETFs to price discovery increased. We also find that the information leadership shares of futures and ETFs depend on the ratio of the quoted percentage spread between futures and ETFs and the aggregate volatility occurring in these markets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phantom Liquidity and High-Frequency Quoting COMMENTARY: Commentary on “If Best Execution Is a Process, What Does That Process Look Like?”1 Editor’s Letter Machine Learning for Algorithmic Trading and Trade Schedule Optimization COMMENTARY: A Market Structure That Fits the Needs of Portfolio Managers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1