开放式笔记与闭环沟通:透明病历时代的人为障碍案例

Horwitz Elana, Lao Bryan, Robbins-Welty Gregg, Tuck Andrew, Gagliardi Jane
{"title":"开放式笔记与闭环沟通:透明病历时代的人为障碍案例","authors":"Horwitz Elana, Lao Bryan, Robbins-Welty Gregg, Tuck Andrew, Gagliardi Jane","doi":"10.36959/784/429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A 31-year-old woman with a nursing background and loin pain-hematuria syndrome undergoes a renal autotransplant. During her recovery and prolonged hospitalization, her care team becomes increasingly concerned about a factitious disorder. With the roll-out of the 21st Century Cures Act Final Rule, which involves direct sharing of medical records with patients in real time, multiple inpatient care teams leave their clinical suspicion out of their progress notes for fear of damaging the therapeutic relationship. This case provides an opportunity to consider implications of the Final Rule policy of “open notes” for patients with sensitive psychiatric diagnoses, highlighting the need for effective communication and collaboration between inpatient teams and realistic approaches to the integration of documentation in patient care. Check for updates during her hospitalization. Factitious disorder is characterized by the falsification of symptoms for internal reward. Loin pain-hematuria syndrome is a rare condition characterized by chronic bilateral or unilateral flank pain and recurrent hematuria, hypothesized to have a psychogenic component [4]. While literature exists on the effects of the Open Notes Rule in the outpatient setting, little attention has been given to the changing dynamic in the inpatient care setting or to the effect on patient care when sensitive psychiatric information is relevant [5-7]. We will highlight the effects of Open Notes on team communication, treatment planning, and clinical outcome in this patient with factitious disorder, as well as potential strategies to address these unique dynamics.","PeriodicalId":165943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatry Treatment and Research","volume":"84 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open Notes and Closed-Loop Communication: A Case of Factitious Disorder in the Age of Transparent Medical Records\",\"authors\":\"Horwitz Elana, Lao Bryan, Robbins-Welty Gregg, Tuck Andrew, Gagliardi Jane\",\"doi\":\"10.36959/784/429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A 31-year-old woman with a nursing background and loin pain-hematuria syndrome undergoes a renal autotransplant. During her recovery and prolonged hospitalization, her care team becomes increasingly concerned about a factitious disorder. With the roll-out of the 21st Century Cures Act Final Rule, which involves direct sharing of medical records with patients in real time, multiple inpatient care teams leave their clinical suspicion out of their progress notes for fear of damaging the therapeutic relationship. This case provides an opportunity to consider implications of the Final Rule policy of “open notes” for patients with sensitive psychiatric diagnoses, highlighting the need for effective communication and collaboration between inpatient teams and realistic approaches to the integration of documentation in patient care. Check for updates during her hospitalization. Factitious disorder is characterized by the falsification of symptoms for internal reward. Loin pain-hematuria syndrome is a rare condition characterized by chronic bilateral or unilateral flank pain and recurrent hematuria, hypothesized to have a psychogenic component [4]. While literature exists on the effects of the Open Notes Rule in the outpatient setting, little attention has been given to the changing dynamic in the inpatient care setting or to the effect on patient care when sensitive psychiatric information is relevant [5-7]. We will highlight the effects of Open Notes on team communication, treatment planning, and clinical outcome in this patient with factitious disorder, as well as potential strategies to address these unique dynamics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychiatry Treatment and Research\",\"volume\":\"84 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychiatry Treatment and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36959/784/429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatry Treatment and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36959/784/429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个31岁的女性护理背景和腰痛血尿综合征接受肾脏自体移植。在她的康复和长期住院期间,她的护理团队越来越担心这是一种人为的障碍。随着《21世纪治愈法案最终规则》(21st Century Cures Act Final Rule)的推出(该规则涉及直接与患者实时共享医疗记录),多个住院护理团队将他们的临床怀疑从他们的进度记录中删除,因为担心破坏治疗关系。本案例提供了一个机会来考虑对敏感精神病诊断患者“开放笔记”的最终规则政策的含义,强调住院团队之间有效沟通和合作的必要性,以及在患者护理中整合文件的现实方法。查看她住院期间的最新情况。人为障碍的特点是为获得内在奖励而伪造症状。腰痛血尿综合征是一种罕见的疾病,其特征是慢性双侧或单侧腹部疼痛和反复出现的血尿,假设有心理因素。虽然有文献报道开放笔记规则在门诊环境中的影响,但很少有人关注住院护理环境中的变化动态,或者当敏感的精神病学信息相关时对患者护理的影响[5-7]。我们将重点介绍Open Notes对团队沟通、治疗计划和该人为障碍患者临床结果的影响,以及解决这些独特动态的潜在策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Open Notes and Closed-Loop Communication: A Case of Factitious Disorder in the Age of Transparent Medical Records
A 31-year-old woman with a nursing background and loin pain-hematuria syndrome undergoes a renal autotransplant. During her recovery and prolonged hospitalization, her care team becomes increasingly concerned about a factitious disorder. With the roll-out of the 21st Century Cures Act Final Rule, which involves direct sharing of medical records with patients in real time, multiple inpatient care teams leave their clinical suspicion out of their progress notes for fear of damaging the therapeutic relationship. This case provides an opportunity to consider implications of the Final Rule policy of “open notes” for patients with sensitive psychiatric diagnoses, highlighting the need for effective communication and collaboration between inpatient teams and realistic approaches to the integration of documentation in patient care. Check for updates during her hospitalization. Factitious disorder is characterized by the falsification of symptoms for internal reward. Loin pain-hematuria syndrome is a rare condition characterized by chronic bilateral or unilateral flank pain and recurrent hematuria, hypothesized to have a psychogenic component [4]. While literature exists on the effects of the Open Notes Rule in the outpatient setting, little attention has been given to the changing dynamic in the inpatient care setting or to the effect on patient care when sensitive psychiatric information is relevant [5-7]. We will highlight the effects of Open Notes on team communication, treatment planning, and clinical outcome in this patient with factitious disorder, as well as potential strategies to address these unique dynamics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Open Notes and Closed-Loop Communication: A Case of Factitious Disorder in the Age of Transparent Medical Records N-Acetylcysteine as an Alternative Treatment in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): A Mini-Review Lithium plus Olanzapine as One of the Most Effective Combinations for Bipolar Disorder. A Case Report and a Concise Review of the Literature The Impact of Acceptance & Commitment Group Therapy on Pain-Related Acceptance in Veterans A 2020 Review of Mental Health Comorbidity in Gender Dysphoric and Gender Non-Conforming People
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1