成为跨学科、女权主义学习背景下的学者

Victoria Pileggi, Joanna Holliday, Carm de Santis, A. LaMarre, Nicole K. Jeffrey, M. Tetro, Carla M. Rice
{"title":"成为跨学科、女权主义学习背景下的学者","authors":"Victoria Pileggi, Joanna Holliday, Carm de Santis, A. LaMarre, Nicole K. Jeffrey, M. Tetro, Carla M. Rice","doi":"10.5406/FEMTEACHER.26.1.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feminist classrooms have become scholarly spaces where instructors, committed to the principles and processes of feminism, are able to seek out and employ creative ways to engage with teaching and learning processes (Gardiner 411). These classrooms are designed to be responsive to students’ needs, experiences, and ways of being (Bryson and Bennet-Anylkwa 133; Hobbs and Rice, “Rethinking” 139), while also inviting instructors to “experiment with new, sometimes risky, pedagogical approaches” (Mahar and Thompson Tetreault 2). Feminist pedagogues value, recognize, and encourage each student’s voice, and they view students as active participants in the learning process (hooks, qtd. in Donadey 83). Transformative processes are implicated in undertaking, establishing, and instituting change on individual, collective, and structural levels in feminist classrooms (Hobbs and Rice, “Introduction” xviii). On a structural level, Carolyn Shrewsbury writes: “[f]eminist pedagogy ultimately seeks a transformation of the academy and points toward steps, however small, that we can all take in each of our classrooms to facilitate that transformation . . . [By centralizing] three concepts, community, empowerment, and leadership . . . [as] a way of organizing our exploration into the meaning of feminist pedagogy” (9–10). Shrewsbury encourages feminist pedagogues to resist the structural constraints inherent in traditional learning environments and to create spaces that generate transformative learning for students and instructors. In so doing, feminist pedagogies can shift orthodox arrangements and practices in the academy. By creating a learning environment that is attuned to power dynamics and structures, feminist pedagogy can generate provisional communities. Shrewsbury conceptualizes such communities as those wherein “both autonomy of self and mutuality” (12) of members’ learning and developmental needs can be met by consensual “participatory and democratic” (13) processes, regardless of Becoming Scholars in an Interdisciplinary, Feminist Learning Context","PeriodicalId":287450,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Teacher","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Becoming Scholars in an Interdisciplinary, Feminist Learning Context\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Pileggi, Joanna Holliday, Carm de Santis, A. LaMarre, Nicole K. Jeffrey, M. Tetro, Carla M. Rice\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/FEMTEACHER.26.1.0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Feminist classrooms have become scholarly spaces where instructors, committed to the principles and processes of feminism, are able to seek out and employ creative ways to engage with teaching and learning processes (Gardiner 411). These classrooms are designed to be responsive to students’ needs, experiences, and ways of being (Bryson and Bennet-Anylkwa 133; Hobbs and Rice, “Rethinking” 139), while also inviting instructors to “experiment with new, sometimes risky, pedagogical approaches” (Mahar and Thompson Tetreault 2). Feminist pedagogues value, recognize, and encourage each student’s voice, and they view students as active participants in the learning process (hooks, qtd. in Donadey 83). Transformative processes are implicated in undertaking, establishing, and instituting change on individual, collective, and structural levels in feminist classrooms (Hobbs and Rice, “Introduction” xviii). On a structural level, Carolyn Shrewsbury writes: “[f]eminist pedagogy ultimately seeks a transformation of the academy and points toward steps, however small, that we can all take in each of our classrooms to facilitate that transformation . . . [By centralizing] three concepts, community, empowerment, and leadership . . . [as] a way of organizing our exploration into the meaning of feminist pedagogy” (9–10). Shrewsbury encourages feminist pedagogues to resist the structural constraints inherent in traditional learning environments and to create spaces that generate transformative learning for students and instructors. In so doing, feminist pedagogies can shift orthodox arrangements and practices in the academy. By creating a learning environment that is attuned to power dynamics and structures, feminist pedagogy can generate provisional communities. Shrewsbury conceptualizes such communities as those wherein “both autonomy of self and mutuality” (12) of members’ learning and developmental needs can be met by consensual “participatory and democratic” (13) processes, regardless of Becoming Scholars in an Interdisciplinary, Feminist Learning Context\",\"PeriodicalId\":287450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist Teacher\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/FEMTEACHER.26.1.0029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/FEMTEACHER.26.1.0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

女权主义教室已经成为学术空间,在这里,致力于女权主义原则和过程的教师能够寻找并采用创造性的方法来参与教学过程(Gardiner 411)。这些教室的设计是为了响应学生的需求、经验和存在方式(Bryson and bennett - anylkwa 133;霍布斯和赖斯,“重新思考”139),同时也邀请教师“尝试新的,有时是冒险的教学方法”(Mahar和Thompson Tetreault 2)。女权主义教师重视,认可并鼓励每个学生的声音,他们将学生视为学习过程的积极参与者(hooks, qtd)。在Donadey 83)。在女权主义课堂中,变革过程涉及在个人、集体和结构层面上进行、建立和实施变革(霍布斯和赖斯,“引言”xviii)。在结构层面上,卡罗琳·什鲁斯伯里写道:“女权主义教育学最终寻求学院的变革,并指出一些步骤,无论多么小,我们都可以在每个教室中采取这些步骤来促进这种变革……(通过集中)三个概念,社区、授权和领导……作为组织我们探索女性主义教育学意义的一种方式”(9-10)。什鲁斯伯里鼓励女权主义教师抵制传统学习环境中固有的结构性约束,并为学生和教师创造能够产生变革学习的空间。这样一来,女权主义教育学可以改变学术界的正统安排和实践。通过创造一个与权力动态和结构相协调的学习环境,女权主义教育学可以产生临时社区。什鲁斯伯里将这样的社区定义为这样的社区,在那里,成员的学习和发展需求的“自我自治和相互性”(12)可以通过协商一致的“参与和民主”(13)过程得到满足,而不管是否成为跨学科、女权主义学习背景下的学者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Becoming Scholars in an Interdisciplinary, Feminist Learning Context
Feminist classrooms have become scholarly spaces where instructors, committed to the principles and processes of feminism, are able to seek out and employ creative ways to engage with teaching and learning processes (Gardiner 411). These classrooms are designed to be responsive to students’ needs, experiences, and ways of being (Bryson and Bennet-Anylkwa 133; Hobbs and Rice, “Rethinking” 139), while also inviting instructors to “experiment with new, sometimes risky, pedagogical approaches” (Mahar and Thompson Tetreault 2). Feminist pedagogues value, recognize, and encourage each student’s voice, and they view students as active participants in the learning process (hooks, qtd. in Donadey 83). Transformative processes are implicated in undertaking, establishing, and instituting change on individual, collective, and structural levels in feminist classrooms (Hobbs and Rice, “Introduction” xviii). On a structural level, Carolyn Shrewsbury writes: “[f]eminist pedagogy ultimately seeks a transformation of the academy and points toward steps, however small, that we can all take in each of our classrooms to facilitate that transformation . . . [By centralizing] three concepts, community, empowerment, and leadership . . . [as] a way of organizing our exploration into the meaning of feminist pedagogy” (9–10). Shrewsbury encourages feminist pedagogues to resist the structural constraints inherent in traditional learning environments and to create spaces that generate transformative learning for students and instructors. In so doing, feminist pedagogies can shift orthodox arrangements and practices in the academy. By creating a learning environment that is attuned to power dynamics and structures, feminist pedagogy can generate provisional communities. Shrewsbury conceptualizes such communities as those wherein “both autonomy of self and mutuality” (12) of members’ learning and developmental needs can be met by consensual “participatory and democratic” (13) processes, regardless of Becoming Scholars in an Interdisciplinary, Feminist Learning Context
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Affinity, Collaboration, and the Politics of Classroom Speaking Burdens of Belonging Self-Silencing and Settling for Less in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration on Behalf of Transgender Youth Performing Self, Performing Community, Performing Care: A Polyphony On the Im/possibilities of Anti-racist and Decolonial Publishing as Pedagogical Praxis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1