集体支配的筛选:欧洲移动通信的案例

Veit Boeckers, Justus Haucap, Ulrich Heimeshoff
{"title":"集体支配的筛选:欧洲移动通信的案例","authors":"Veit Boeckers, Justus Haucap, Ulrich Heimeshoff","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1909545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Competition authorities and regulatory bodies have increasingly made use of econometric and statistical methods in their analysis. Due to limitations of time and data, so-called screening methods have become more and more important in order to decide whether an in-depth inquiry is warranted. This paper uses a new econometric approache to screen selected European mobile telecommunications markets for collective dominance. First, we examine the dynamics of market structure by checking the stationarity of corresponding Her ndahl- Hirschman-indices. Second, we estimate Vector-Autoregressive models (VAR) taking entry or exit of competitors into account. If the market as characterized by collective dominance, the dominant operators should be able (by de nition) to act independently from their rivals. Hence, we should only nd Granger-causality from the dominant operators' series on their non-dominant rivals in that (hypothetical) case. However, we provide evidence that most operators' subscriber series cause each other. This can be interpreted as a sign of e ective competition between those operators. An examination of the Impulse-Response-functions supports the indication of the direction of causality.","PeriodicalId":130313,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Antitrust (European) (Topic)","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening for Collective Dominance: The Case of the European Mobile Telecommunications\",\"authors\":\"Veit Boeckers, Justus Haucap, Ulrich Heimeshoff\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1909545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Competition authorities and regulatory bodies have increasingly made use of econometric and statistical methods in their analysis. Due to limitations of time and data, so-called screening methods have become more and more important in order to decide whether an in-depth inquiry is warranted. This paper uses a new econometric approache to screen selected European mobile telecommunications markets for collective dominance. First, we examine the dynamics of market structure by checking the stationarity of corresponding Her ndahl- Hirschman-indices. Second, we estimate Vector-Autoregressive models (VAR) taking entry or exit of competitors into account. If the market as characterized by collective dominance, the dominant operators should be able (by de nition) to act independently from their rivals. Hence, we should only nd Granger-causality from the dominant operators' series on their non-dominant rivals in that (hypothetical) case. However, we provide evidence that most operators' subscriber series cause each other. This can be interpreted as a sign of e ective competition between those operators. An examination of the Impulse-Response-functions supports the indication of the direction of causality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Antitrust (European) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Antitrust (European) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1909545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Antitrust (European) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1909545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

竞争主管部门和管理机构在其分析中越来越多地使用计量经济学和统计方法。由于时间和数据的限制,为了决定是否有必要进行深入调查,所谓的筛选方法变得越来越重要。本文采用一种新的计量经济学方法筛选选定的欧洲移动通信市场的集体支配地位。首先,我们通过检查相应的赫尔达尔-赫希曼指数的平稳性来检验市场结构的动态。其次,我们估计向量自回归模型(VAR)考虑进入或退出竞争对手。如果市场的特点是集体支配,占支配地位的经营者应该能够(根据定义)独立于其竞争对手采取行动。因此,在这种(假设的)情况下,我们只能从占主导地位的经营者级数中得出其非占主导地位的竞争对手的格兰杰因果关系。然而,我们提供的证据表明,大多数运营商的用户系列是相互导致的。这可以解释为这些运营商之间存在有效竞争的迹象。对脉冲响应函数的检验支持因果关系方向的指示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Screening for Collective Dominance: The Case of the European Mobile Telecommunications
Competition authorities and regulatory bodies have increasingly made use of econometric and statistical methods in their analysis. Due to limitations of time and data, so-called screening methods have become more and more important in order to decide whether an in-depth inquiry is warranted. This paper uses a new econometric approache to screen selected European mobile telecommunications markets for collective dominance. First, we examine the dynamics of market structure by checking the stationarity of corresponding Her ndahl- Hirschman-indices. Second, we estimate Vector-Autoregressive models (VAR) taking entry or exit of competitors into account. If the market as characterized by collective dominance, the dominant operators should be able (by de nition) to act independently from their rivals. Hence, we should only nd Granger-causality from the dominant operators' series on their non-dominant rivals in that (hypothetical) case. However, we provide evidence that most operators' subscriber series cause each other. This can be interpreted as a sign of e ective competition between those operators. An examination of the Impulse-Response-functions supports the indication of the direction of causality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calculating Cartel Damages Data Collaboratives, Competition Law and the Governance of EU Data Spaces The Effectiveness of European Antitrust Fines Unfair Pricing and Standard Essential Patents A Reform Too Few or a Reform Too Many: Judicial Review, Appeals or a Prosecutorial System under the UK Competition Act 1998?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1