政治体制、投资和选举的不确定性

I. Marcelin, Sheryl-Ann K. Stephen, Fassil Fanta, M. Teclezion
{"title":"政治体制、投资和选举的不确定性","authors":"I. Marcelin, Sheryl-Ann K. Stephen, Fassil Fanta, M. Teclezion","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3401514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study looks at firm’s investment spending in fixed and intangible assets around three types of national elections: presidential, joint presidential and legislative, and parliamentary elections. Investment in fixed assets declines by up to 2.3% during presidential elections, and 4.43% in joint presidential and legislative elections years. On the other hand, intangible investment decreases by 4.47% in parliamentary election years. Moreover, investment responses to electoral shocks differ markedly within political systems and countries’ institutional settings. Investment levels shift significantly downward in pre- and resume in postelection years. The electoral effect results in a net loss in investment over the election cycle.","PeriodicalId":365642,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic)","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political Regimes, Investment and Electoral Uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"I. Marcelin, Sheryl-Ann K. Stephen, Fassil Fanta, M. Teclezion\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3401514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study looks at firm’s investment spending in fixed and intangible assets around three types of national elections: presidential, joint presidential and legislative, and parliamentary elections. Investment in fixed assets declines by up to 2.3% during presidential elections, and 4.43% in joint presidential and legislative elections years. On the other hand, intangible investment decreases by 4.47% in parliamentary election years. Moreover, investment responses to electoral shocks differ markedly within political systems and countries’ institutional settings. Investment levels shift significantly downward in pre- and resume in postelection years. The electoral effect results in a net loss in investment over the election cycle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3401514\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3401514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究考察了企业在三类国家选举中的固定资产和无形资产投资支出:总统选举、联合总统和立法机构选举以及议会选举。固定资产投资在总统选举期间最多下降2.3%,在总统和立法机构联合选举年下降4.43%。另一方面,在议会选举年,无形投资减少4.47%。此外,投资对选举冲击的反应在不同的政治制度和国家制度背景下存在显著差异。投资水平在选举前显著下降,在选举后的年份恢复。选举效应导致在选举周期内投资的净损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Political Regimes, Investment and Electoral Uncertainty
Abstract This study looks at firm’s investment spending in fixed and intangible assets around three types of national elections: presidential, joint presidential and legislative, and parliamentary elections. Investment in fixed assets declines by up to 2.3% during presidential elections, and 4.43% in joint presidential and legislative elections years. On the other hand, intangible investment decreases by 4.47% in parliamentary election years. Moreover, investment responses to electoral shocks differ markedly within political systems and countries’ institutional settings. Investment levels shift significantly downward in pre- and resume in postelection years. The electoral effect results in a net loss in investment over the election cycle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The CEO Factor: Public Perception and Stock Price Firm Growth Potential and Option Returns Does Import Competition from China Discipline Overconfident CEOs in U.S. Firms? Experimental Evidence of Source Preference: Familiarity and Home Bias Let Me Sleep on It: Sleep and Investor Reactions to Earnings Surprises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1