{"title":"结构基础隔振磁流变阻尼器的模糊半主动控制","authors":"Han Wang, H. Malki, G. Song","doi":"10.1109/FUZZY.2009.5277267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents four types of semi-active control on Magnetorheological (MR) Damper in an experimental base isolation structure model with three degree-of-freedom. The semi-active control methods include proportional-derivative (PD) control, and three fuzzy control methods: rule-based fuzzy logic control, auto-tuning fuzzy PD control, and discrete fuzzy PD control. The main purpose is to compare the response effect between passive control methods and semi-active control methods, and also compare within semi-active controls. The results of both passive controls and semi-active controls in experiments are presented. From the results, semi-active controls are shown more adaptive than passive control for this model when the earthquake type is unknown. Moreover, auto-tuning fuzzy PD control is proved to have relatively best performance among all control methods.","PeriodicalId":117895,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fuzzy semi-active control of MR damper for structural base isolation\",\"authors\":\"Han Wang, H. Malki, G. Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FUZZY.2009.5277267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents four types of semi-active control on Magnetorheological (MR) Damper in an experimental base isolation structure model with three degree-of-freedom. The semi-active control methods include proportional-derivative (PD) control, and three fuzzy control methods: rule-based fuzzy logic control, auto-tuning fuzzy PD control, and discrete fuzzy PD control. The main purpose is to compare the response effect between passive control methods and semi-active control methods, and also compare within semi-active controls. The results of both passive controls and semi-active controls in experiments are presented. From the results, semi-active controls are shown more adaptive than passive control for this model when the earthquake type is unknown. Moreover, auto-tuning fuzzy PD control is proved to have relatively best performance among all control methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.2009.5277267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.2009.5277267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fuzzy semi-active control of MR damper for structural base isolation
This paper presents four types of semi-active control on Magnetorheological (MR) Damper in an experimental base isolation structure model with three degree-of-freedom. The semi-active control methods include proportional-derivative (PD) control, and three fuzzy control methods: rule-based fuzzy logic control, auto-tuning fuzzy PD control, and discrete fuzzy PD control. The main purpose is to compare the response effect between passive control methods and semi-active control methods, and also compare within semi-active controls. The results of both passive controls and semi-active controls in experiments are presented. From the results, semi-active controls are shown more adaptive than passive control for this model when the earthquake type is unknown. Moreover, auto-tuning fuzzy PD control is proved to have relatively best performance among all control methods.