随时可用:从虚假账户贩运到Twitter上的协调不真实行为

Q1 Social Sciences Online Social Networks and Media Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.osnem.2022.100224
Michele Mazza , Guglielmo Cola , Maurizio Tesconi
{"title":"随时可用:从虚假账户贩运到Twitter上的协调不真实行为","authors":"Michele Mazza ,&nbsp;Guglielmo Cola ,&nbsp;Maurizio Tesconi","doi":"10.1016/j.osnem.2022.100224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fake accounts are the primary means for misuse and abuse of social media platforms<span><span>, giving rise to coordinated inauthentic behaviors. Despite ongoing efforts to limit their exploitation, ready-to-use fake accounts can be found for sale on several underground markets. For the present study, we devised an innovative approach to detect accounts for sale on an underground market. Between June 2019 and July 2021, we detected more than 60,000 fake accounts, which we continuously tracked for changes in profile information and timeline. Afterward, we focused on the 23,579 accounts that produced at least one tweet in 2020, identifying the main characteristics like the most used names and profile descriptions. Also, we analyzed more than five million interactions, including mentions, replies, retweets, and the use of hashtags and URLs in tweets. These analyses exposed behavioral patterns indicating coordination, like using similar profile names or retweeting the same user. In particular, we spotted four coordinated campaigns, whose behavior ranged from attempting to influence the political debate in Buenos Aires to aggressive </span>spam<span> activity aimed at scamming cryptocurrency users or advertising counterfeit goods.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":52228,"journal":{"name":"Online Social Networks and Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ready-to-(ab)use: From fake account trafficking to coordinated inauthentic behavior on Twitter\",\"authors\":\"Michele Mazza ,&nbsp;Guglielmo Cola ,&nbsp;Maurizio Tesconi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.osnem.2022.100224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Fake accounts are the primary means for misuse and abuse of social media platforms<span><span>, giving rise to coordinated inauthentic behaviors. Despite ongoing efforts to limit their exploitation, ready-to-use fake accounts can be found for sale on several underground markets. For the present study, we devised an innovative approach to detect accounts for sale on an underground market. Between June 2019 and July 2021, we detected more than 60,000 fake accounts, which we continuously tracked for changes in profile information and timeline. Afterward, we focused on the 23,579 accounts that produced at least one tweet in 2020, identifying the main characteristics like the most used names and profile descriptions. Also, we analyzed more than five million interactions, including mentions, replies, retweets, and the use of hashtags and URLs in tweets. These analyses exposed behavioral patterns indicating coordination, like using similar profile names or retweeting the same user. In particular, we spotted four coordinated campaigns, whose behavior ranged from attempting to influence the political debate in Buenos Aires to aggressive </span>spam<span> activity aimed at scamming cryptocurrency users or advertising counterfeit goods.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Online Social Networks and Media\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Online Social Networks and Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696422000271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Social Networks and Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696422000271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

虚假账户是滥用和滥用社交媒体平台的主要手段,引发了相互协调的不真实行为。尽管一直在努力限制他们的利用,但在几个地下市场上仍然可以找到现成的假账户。在本研究中,我们设计了一种创新的方法来检测地下市场上的销售账户。在2019年6月至2021年7月期间,我们发现了6万多个虚假账户,并持续跟踪其个人资料信息和时间线的变化。之后,我们关注了在2020年至少发过一条推文的23579个账户,确定了最常用的名字和个人资料描述等主要特征。此外,我们还分析了500多万次互动,包括提及、回复、转发以及推文中标签和url的使用。这些分析揭示了表明协调的行为模式,比如使用相似的个人资料名称或转发同一用户。特别是,我们发现了四个协调的活动,其行为范围从试图影响布宜诺斯艾利斯的政治辩论到旨在欺骗加密货币用户或宣传假冒商品的激进垃圾邮件活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ready-to-(ab)use: From fake account trafficking to coordinated inauthentic behavior on Twitter

Fake accounts are the primary means for misuse and abuse of social media platforms, giving rise to coordinated inauthentic behaviors. Despite ongoing efforts to limit their exploitation, ready-to-use fake accounts can be found for sale on several underground markets. For the present study, we devised an innovative approach to detect accounts for sale on an underground market. Between June 2019 and July 2021, we detected more than 60,000 fake accounts, which we continuously tracked for changes in profile information and timeline. Afterward, we focused on the 23,579 accounts that produced at least one tweet in 2020, identifying the main characteristics like the most used names and profile descriptions. Also, we analyzed more than five million interactions, including mentions, replies, retweets, and the use of hashtags and URLs in tweets. These analyses exposed behavioral patterns indicating coordination, like using similar profile names or retweeting the same user. In particular, we spotted four coordinated campaigns, whose behavior ranged from attempting to influence the political debate in Buenos Aires to aggressive spam activity aimed at scamming cryptocurrency users or advertising counterfeit goods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Online Social Networks and Media
Online Social Networks and Media Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
44 days
期刊最新文献
How does user-generated content on Social Media affect stock predictions? A case study on GameStop Measuring centralization of online platforms through size and interconnection of communities Crowdsourcing the Mitigation of disinformation and misinformation: The case of spontaneous community-based moderation on Reddit GASCOM: Graph-based Attentive Semantic Context Modeling for Online Conversation Understanding The influence of coordinated behavior on toxicity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1